Thursday, January 9, 2014

Isaiah 1:1-20: White as Snow.

Presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, 12 Jan 2014 
Presented to Alberni Valley Ministries, 07 Sept 2025 
View the 2025 version here: 
by Captain (Major) Michael Ramsay.

Isaiah Chapter 1 has often been compared to a courtroom scene as Isaiah uses much of the same language that one would hear in an ancient near east indictment. As a parent of three children, this passage reminds me of a child coming before their parents or a student coming before the principal in the days before they banned the strap[1] – which is surprisingly not so long ago in Saskatchewan here. The exasperated parent in the opening verses (1:2ff) calls out:

Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth!
For the Lord has spoken:
“I reared children and brought them up,
but they have rebelled against me.
The ox knows its master,
the donkey its owner’s manger,
but [my daughter] Israel does not know,
my people [my children] do not understand.”

Mom or Dad continues,
Woe to the sinful nation [family],
a people whose guilt is great,
a brood of evildoers,
children given to corruption!
They have forsaken the Lord;
they have spurned the Holy One of Israel
and turned their backs on Him.

Now this is where it gets interesting. God is obviously being compared to a judge ordering corporal punishment or more likely - with this language of the family here - a parent who physically disciplines his children.[2] God is portrayed as one who has been provoked to this quite severely. Isaiah says, Verses 5-6:

Why should you be beaten anymore?
Why do you persist in rebellion?
Your whole head is injured,
your whole heart afflicted.
From the sole of your foot to the top of your head
there is no soundness—
only wounds and welts
and open sores,
not cleansed or bandaged
or soothed with olive oil.

And then Isaiah tells us what he means by this analogy of God having the transgressor beaten. He says:

Your country is desolate,
your cities burned with fire;
your fields are being stripped by foreigners
right before you,
laid waste as when overthrown by strangers.
Daughter Zion is left
like a shelter in a vineyard,
like a hut in a cucumber field,
like a city under siege.
Unless the Lord Almighty
had left us some survivors,
we would have become like Sodom,
we would have been like Gomorrah.

Let’s stop and think about this for a while because it raises a number of really serious questions:

  1. Does God condone beating children or other offenders?
  2. Does God beat us into submission through events in our life?
  3. Is God picking on Israel? Does He pick on us?
There will be a fourth question that we will look at too:
  1. Does God want more from us than just to worship Him?

We will come back to these questions but first let us look a little bit at the historical context of this text. Isaiah the prophet lived in the 8th Century BCE. He lived 700 or so years before Christ. He and his wife were both prophets (8:1-4)[3] and he had a number of disciples who worked with him (8:16-22) and they probably carried on his prophetic work long after he had received his ‘Promotion to Glory’. Isaiah is mentioned elsewhere in the books of 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles in our Bibles (2 Kings 19:1-7, 14-37; 20:1-11; 2 Chronicles 26:22, 32:9-33). And Verse 1 of Chapter 1 of Isaiah tells us that the part of the book to which we are referring is ‘The vision concerning Judah and Jerusalem that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah’.

At this time in history the regional superpowers are Egypt to the southwest and Assyria to the northeast of Israel and Judah who are, with others, stuck right in the middle as they vie for military, political, and economic power in the area. Israel and Judah, as this prophecy is being spoken to them, are extremely vulnerable to attack. Israel will actually be wiped out by the Assyrians right around this time, in 722 BCE. This brings us back to Isaiah’s prophetic warning to the people of Israel and Judah.[4]

As we have said, Isaiah uses the language of a parent applying corporal punishment – spanking or more – to his children. From this language arises then our first three questions that we are looking at:

  1. Does God condone beating children or other offenders?
  2. Does God beat us into submission through events in our life?
  3. Is God picking on Israel? Does He pick on us?

Does God here condone beating children or other offenders (like they cane people in Singapore, for example)? No, He doesn’t. But neither does He condemn it here either. God isn’t actually addressing the best way to discipline your children at all in this pericope; God, through Isaiah, is merely drawing an analogy that everyone listening to his prophecy at this time and place would understand. If this pericope were penned in our contemporary Canadian culture, Verses 5 and 6 probably could read:

O Canada, why should you be in timeout anymore?
Why do you persist in rebellion?
Your whole day is spent in that timeout chair,
You are grounded for a week
From the time you get up in the morning until the time you go to bed
there is no TV, video games or friends—
only sitting in the timeout chair
not moving or talking
or doing anything but homework.

God is not addressing corporal punishment specifically here. He is talking about the importance of a parent disciplining his children. And we know that a loving parent does teach his children right from wrong. A loving parent does discipline her children. Proverbs 24:18, which my mother used to quote for me many time growing up, reads:

Whoever spares the rod hates their children,
but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them.
[Spare the rod and spoil the child]

The parent who loves their children disciplines them. The one who hates them does not. This is what God is talking about in our text today. God says to the people of Israel and Judah: 'Look at all of these things that are happening to you now', Verse 7:

Your country is desolate,
your cities burned with fire;
your fields are being stripped by foreigners
right before you,
laid waste as when overthrown by strangers.

Take this as a warning, God says. Like a parent, He says, ‘now think about what you have done. This should be an opportunity for you, my children, to think about what you have done and make the necessary changes before it is too late and something really drastic happens.’

God isn’t beating His children into submission; God is disciplining them before they - through their actions - cause real problems for themselves. God is warning them and hopefully they will heed His instruction so that they will not force their own destruction upon themselves. What Israel and Judah are experiencing is a direct result of their blindly acting out on their own without taking care of their little brother or sister. God isn’t picking on Israel at all; as a matter of fact He is telling Israel to smarten up and to stop picking on her little sister or there will be real problems.

God doesn’t pick on us either in our lives. Many times, if the hardships in life that we are experiencing are the natural results of our own actions, then indeed we should take them as an opportunity to change before our own actions result in our own destruction. However, we must not forget that when in the New Testament Jesus’ own disciples make the theological error of the prosperity heresy, asking, John 9:2, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” When they say that sin is the reason the boy is blind; when they imply that anything and everything that we don’t enjoy in life is condemnation from God, Jesus rebukes them. John 9:3, “‘neither this man nor his parents sinned,’ said Jesus, ‘but this happened so that the works of God might be displayed in him.’”

God doesn’t punish us ‘willy, nilly’. He isn’t a vengeful God like the mythological Zeus sitting on a cloud with a thunderbolt waiting to zap us whenever we do something wrong. Quite the opposite; in our pericope today, God is compared to a loving parent who needs to discipline His own children before they race off to their own destruction.

That brings us to Verses 11-17. My own children of course are very near perfect and almost never ever need correction or discipline…but occasionally if Susan or I pull one of them aside and have to discipline them, she may protest: What did I do? It was my sister that did that. I didn’t do anything wrong! It isn’t my day to unload the dishwasher or do some other chore that isn't done! It’s not my fault! She hit me first... She told me to do that… I didn’t do anything wrong! I was just nicely doing my chores, doing my homework, minding my own business when all of a sudden that favourite mug of yours just jumped off the cupboard and broke all by itself. I didn’t do anything wrong! It's not my fault! You're picking on me! It’s not fair!

Israel’s complains: ‘Why are you disciplining us? We didn’t do anything wrong: we always observe the Sabbaths and other occasions, we always come to the Temple, we always offer You sacrifices, we always pray; so why are you picking on us, God? It’s not fair. That brings us to our fourth question: does God ask more of us than just to worship Him? Do You, God, always appreciate our worship even? God’s reply, Verses 11-15:

“The multitude of your sacrifices—
what are they to me?” says the Lord.
“I have more than enough of burnt offerings,
of rams and the fat of fattened animals;
I have no pleasure
in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats.
When you come to appear before me,
who has asked this of you,
this trampling of my courts?
Stop bringing meaningless offerings!
Your incense is detestable to me.
New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations—
I cannot bear your worthless assemblies.
Your New Moon feasts and your appointed festivals
I hate with all my being.
They have become a burden to me;
I am weary of bearing them.
When you spread out your hands in prayer,
I hide my eyes from you;
even when you offer many prayers,
I am not listening.
Your hands are full of blood!

This is significant. The children of Israel are praying; they are going to church, going to the Temple; they are offering sacrifices; they are spending time with God; so, is praying, reading your Bible and worshipping in church enough to experience God’s salvation? God says ‘no’.

Many times in the Scriptures God tells us that He doesn’t want a proverbial Christmas card from us if we are going to refuse to be nice to our sister. He says, ‘don’t give me a hug if you are just going to turn around and bop your brother on the head’. He says, ‘I don’t want your praises if you are going to keep picking on your little brother and your little sister.’ He says, ‘You say you love Me but that is not true; if it were true that you love Me, you would be nice to my children; if it were true that you love Me, you would love your brother. If it is true that you love Me, stop picking on your sister![5] Verses 16 and 17:

Wash and make yourselves clean.
Take your evil deeds out of my sight;
stop doing wrong.
Learn to do right; seek justice.
Defend the oppressed.
Take up the cause of the fatherless;
plead the case of the widow.

This I think is very important for those of us who are here today. Jesus says, Matthew 22:37-38 “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment.” But He doesn't end there. Verses 39 and 40, Jesus says, “...‘Love your neighbour as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

Jesus says, Matthew 5:23-24, “Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother or sister has something against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift.”

Jesus says, in the Lord’s Prayer, Matthew 6:12, ‘forgive us our sins, as we also have forgiven those who have sinned against us.’ And Jesus says, Matthew 6:14-15, “For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.”

Jesus says again, Matthew 25, just like in Isaiah 1, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did not do for me (v.41).’ So ‘…depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels (v. 45)’.  But “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world (v.34).’” For, ‘truly I tell you, whatever you did do for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did do for me (v.40).’”

This is very important for us in the churches: when we gossip about others, when we complain about others, when we won’t sit with others, when we won’t talk to others, when we won’t go to church or to a certain event because someone else is there; when we are mad with our brother; when we don’t forgive our Christian sisters, when we do this, God can’t be expected to forgive us now can he?

It is my hope then that in these last few minutes as we sing our songs of response to today's message, that if there is indeed any sin that you need to get rid of; if there is anyone you need to forgive so that your Father in Heaven will forgive you, it is my encouragement that you will do that now even before you leave this room. And, of course, if you would like to come up to the front for prayer support before we leave, that is what the Mercy Seat here is for - it is a place to meet God and God is always available and God wants to love us and to forgive us and Isaiah 1:18-19a,

“Come now, let us settle the matter,”
says the Lord.
“Though your sins are like scarlet,
they shall be as white as snow;
though they are red as crimson,
they shall be like wool.
If you are willing and obedient...
Let us pray.





[1]Cf. Alec Motyer, J.: Isaiah: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1999 (Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries 20), S. 50
[2] Cf. Gene M. Tucker, NIB VI: The Book of Isaiah 1-39, (Abingdon Press, Nashville, Tenn: 2001),53.
[3] But Cf. John H. Tullock and Mark MacEntire, The Old Testament Story, (Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ: 2006) 214 where they argue that Isaiah 8:3 may not be designating his wife as a prophet but rather as the wife of a prophet.
[4] Cf. By Captain Michael Ramsay, Isaiah 1-39: 1st Isaiah, Later the World. Presented to Swift Current Corps on January 10, 2010. Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2010/01/isaiah-1-39-1st-isaiah-later-world.html
[5] Cf. Walter Brueggemann, ‘Isaiah 1-39,’ Westminster Bible Companion (Westminster John Knox Press: Louisville, Kentucky, 1998), 17-18

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Matthew 1-2: Joseph the Dreamer II

Presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, 29 December 2013 by Captain Michael Ramsay

In the lead up to Christmas we looked at the genealogy and the lineage of Christ. Today, I want to look one more time at an important person in that list. Joseph the son of Israel is often referred as ‘Joseph the Dreamer’ for the dreams he has about his father, mother, brothers and the dreams he interprets for Pharaoh and his servants. This Sunday we are looking at Joseph, the legal guardian of Jesus. Joseph is an interesting person. Joseph is a righteous man. Joseph is Jesus’ stepfather. And this Joseph is no less a dreamer than was his namesake in the book of Genesis (Another more common OT comparison in these chapters is, of course, that of Jesus to Moses; cf. Josephus Antiquities II, 205-7, 15-16 [ix. 2-3]).[1]

When we are first introduced to Joseph, we understand that he is descended from some pretty famous ancestors who he traces all the way back to Abraham.[2] Matthew Chapter 1 reads:

This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah the son of David, the son of Abraham:

 Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,
 Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar,
Perez the father of Hezron,
Hezron the father of Ram,
 Ram the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
Nahshon the father of Salmon,
 Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth,
Obed the father of Jesse,

 and Jesse the father of King David.
David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife,

 Solomon the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
Abijah the father of Asa,
 Asa the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram,
Jehoram the father of Uzziah,
 Uzziah the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,
 Hezekiah the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
Amon the father of Josiah,

 and Josiah the father of Jeconiah and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.

 After the exile to Babylon:
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,
 Zerubbabel the father of Abihud,
Abihud the father of Eliakim,
Eliakim the father of Azor,
 Azor the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
Akim the father of Elihud,
 Elihud the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
Matthan the father of Jacob,

 and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah.

We have studied a number of these people in the months leading up to Christmas and the significance of God preordaining them to be in the lineage and genealogy of the Christ. Now we come to a very interesting verse in the lineage of the Christ. Matthew 1:16, which we just read: “and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah.” You will notice that it says that even though Joseph’s genealogy provides the lineage of Jesus, it does not say that Joseph is Jesus’ birth father.[3] It says that he was instead “the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah.” To this point in the story we know two things about Joseph:
1)      He is Jesus’ legal father
2)      He is not Jesus’ biological father
Reading the story to this point then raises a couple of questions:
1)      Who is Jesus’ biological father?
2)      Why does Joseph take Mary’s son to raise as his own?

A response to these, Matthew tells us in Chapter 1:18-25:
This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit. Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.

But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”

All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”).

When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

Joseph finds out that his fiancée is pregnant but not by him. Last Sunday we spoke to this a little bit.[4] We spoke about how Joseph was a righteous man and that when he found out that his fiancée became pregnant by someone other than himself, knowing that if he wanted he could actually have her stoned to death; but he didn’t. He was a righteous man and he wanted to divorce her quietly.

It was then that Joseph has a dream. And it is in this dream that an angel tells Joseph that he is still to marry his fiancée and the angel also tells Joseph what to name this son. Joseph then wakes from his dream and he does everything just as he was instructed in his dream.

If you were in his place and your girlfriend became pregnant not by yourself and you had decided to break up with her then that night you have a dream about an angel telling you not to break up with her but to go ahead and marry her and you also dream about what to name the child and who the child would become, would you think that was true? What would you do? Joseph believes his dream and Joseph does everything that the angel in his dream tells him to do – including marrying Mary and refraining from having any physical relations with her until her son is born.

Then, Matthew Chapter 2:1-11:
After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem and asked, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him.”

When King Herod heard this he was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him. When he had called together all the people’s chief priests and teachers of the law, he asked them where the Messiah was to be born. “In Bethlehem in Judea,” they replied, “for this is what the prophet has written:

“‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,
are by no means least among the rulers of Judah;
for out of you will come a ruler
who will shepherd my people Israel.’”

Then Herod called the Magi secretly and found out from them the exact time the star had appeared. He sent them to Bethlehem and said, “Go and search carefully for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him.”

After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they had seen when it rose went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they were overjoyed. On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and presented him with gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh.”

Joseph is present when these strangers show up with great gifts for the newborn son. This would be quite a sign for anyone and everyone (see Numbers 22:17).[5] It must have been a wonderful confirmation for Joseph that indeed his dream was from God and indeed his obedience to the angel in his dream was obedience to God himself. Joseph must have thought and felt so many things with the birth of his legal son here who was and who is the Son of God, Himself.

And then, Matthew 2:13-14:
When they had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream. “Get up,” he said, “take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.”

So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: “Out of Egypt I called my son.”

After time has passed here, Joseph has another dream about an angel. This time he dreams about an angel telling him to leave for a foreign country with his wife and her young son. Joseph, a young dad, then takes his young wife and his young child and goes to a foreign country without any family waiting for him there, without any job waiting for him there, without any support network waiting for him there and he has a young wife and a young child to care for. He takes them away from all the supports that are available for him at home because of a dream he has of an angel again.

He is proved right again by following this dream, just as he was by following the instructions given him through the previous dream. Matthew 2:16-18:

When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi. Then what was said through the prophet Jeremiah was fulfilled:

“A voice is heard in Ramah,
weeping and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children
and refusing to be comforted,
because they are no more.”

And then yet again, after however much time Joseph spends living, working and raising his family in Egypt – they are settled now - Joseph has yet another dream, Matthew 1:19-23:

After Herod died, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt and said, “Get up, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who were trying to take the child’s life are dead.”

So he got up, took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. But when he heard that Archelaus was reigning in Judea in place of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. Having been warned in a dream, he withdrew to the district of Galilee, and he went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets, that he would be called a Nazarene.

Joseph is a righteous man, the Bible tells us. And Joseph the dreamer has had quite a challenging time of his adult life so far. Let’s think about it: His wife has given birth to a child, not his own. He has a dream so he married her. He then dreams again so he takes his wife and the child to a foreign country without any job or any family and he finally gets settled and now he has yet another dream. This dream tells him to walk away from everything that he is working on in Egypt, quit his work, and pack up his wife and child again (and maybe even other children at this point). Joseph does this again. Because of a dream he has, he moves his family back to Judea. Upon returning to Judea, he doesn’t like the political situation and so he moves up north, out in the country. He moves to Galilee, to the town of Nazareth where he proceeds to disappear from our records all together.[6] We never hear of him again. This is all we know of Joseph, the legal guardian, the stepfather of Jesus.

People assume Joseph dies young because Jesus’ mother and brothers are mentioned more than once in the documents that we have but if you search your scriptures, you will notice that Joseph is not. Here is a man who gave up everything that he had worked for on more than one occasion to follow a dream; here is a man who has given up everything in his life more than once to follow God. It was not apparently an easy life he led: repeatedly dropping everything. He travels from Judea to Egypt to Galilee and Nazareth. And then after doing all of this, the presumption is that he dies early. He gives up everything to follow his God-given dreams. He gives up everything to follow God and God uses the obedience of this man to bless the whole world.

He gives up everything to follow the Lord and this is exactly what we too are called to do today. And in so doing Jesus promises, Matthew 19:29-30, that “everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first.” Joseph gives up his whole life to follow the Lord as God leads him through dreams. Joseph has the choice on more than one occasion to either focus on his own needs and the apparent needs of his family or to follow the Lord’s direction and each time it is recorded, he follows the Lord’s leading. So too do we have this choice today. Jesus says and Matthew records that we can either work to be first in this world or we can give up our whole life to follow Christ and thus be first in the next. May we today follow the example of Joseph. It is my prayer that each of us here will choose God’s eternal life over our own plans for own life. For, as Matthew reminds us, “everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.”

We are now invited to stand and sing together "I believe in Jesus" and if this song is true of you today, I invite you that as you leave the sanctuary today, you can write your name on a leaf here that we will add to the ‘Vine of Christ’ that we have been working on. As we each write our names on a leaf and leave it at the mercy seat, it will be a public acknowledgement that indeed we believe in Jesus.

Let us sing.


---

[1] Cf. D.A. Carson, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Matthew/Exposition of Matthew/I. Prologue: The Origin and Birth of Jesus the Christ (1:1-2:23)/C. The Visit of the Magi (2:1-12), Book Version: 4.0.2
[2] Cf. Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Matthew 1:1-17, Luke 3:23-38: De Vine Final,' presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, (Sheepspeak.com: Swift Current, SK: 24 November 2013). Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2013/11/matthew-11-17-luke-323-38-de-vine-final.html for the summary sermon of this series.
[3] Cf. R. T. France, Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1985 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 1), S. 76: This new phraseology makes it clear that Matthew does not regard Jesus as Joseph’s son physically, and vv. 18–25 will explain this at length.
[4] Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Matthew 1:18-2:18: What is your choice?' presented to the Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, (Sheepspeak.com: Swift Current, Sk: 23 December, 2013 and 26 December 2010). Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2013/12/matthew-118-218-what-is-your-choice.html cf. also Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Luke 1:26-37: Do You Believe?' Presented to the Nipawin Corps 14 December 2008. Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/12/luke-126-37-do-you-believe.html and Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Matthew 1:18-25: Do you believe?' Presented to each Nipawin and Tisdale Corps, 24 December 2007 and the CFOT chapel in Winnipeg, December 2006. Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/12/matthew-118-25-do-you-believe.html
[5] Cf. Daniel J. Harrington, The Gopel of Matthew, (Sagra Pagina: Liturgical Press: Collegeville, Minnesota, 1991), p. 48 re. the prophecy of Balaam as it relates to this episode.
[6] Cf. Daniel J. Harrington, The Gopel of Matthew, (Sagra Pagina: Liturgical Press: Collegeville, Minnesota, 1991), p. 45-46 re. Nazareth. 

Friday, December 20, 2013

Matthew 1:18-2:18: What is your choice?

Presented to the Swift Current Corps on 23 December, 2013 and 26 December 2010 by Captain Michael Ramsay

Click here to read a shorter 2014 and 2015 614 Toronto version: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2014/12/matthew-118-218-what-is-your-choice.html 

Click here to read the 26 December 2021 Alberni Valley version: https://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2021/12/matthew-118-218-whats-your-choice.html
   .
In this passage that we have just read, Matthew’s version of the Christmas story, we are faced with three responses to the miracle of the birth of Christ, the coming of the Messiah, that of:
1)      Joseph (his legal father),
2)      Herod (the king of the Jews), and
3)      Some magi (astrologers, astronomers, magicians or wise men, traditionally ‘we three kings’).
I want to look a little bit today at their three responses to the news that Jesus was to be born and the news that he was actually born.

1) Joseph[1]
First we have Joseph:  Joseph is a carpenter/stone mason. He is from the tribe of Judah and – of course – a famous ancestor of his is King David. Matthew records a few things about Joseph: we are told in our text today that Joseph, Verse 19, is righteous. In our world today when we think of a righteous person… if someone were to tell you that a person is righteous… if someone were to say that a visitor that we have here today is a righteous woman or man, what would we think that they would be like? They would pray, read the Bible, love God and love their neighbour (cf. Luke 10:27). All of the above would probably be true of them and more. This was very much what it would have meant for Joseph too. Joseph served God and for the first century Jews, if one was righteous it meant that one was very good at keeping the religious law of the day.[2]

Matthew tells us also, Verse 1:18, that Joseph is pledged to be married to a girl named Mary.[3] Now, betrothal in the first century is not like it is today. When you are engaged then you are already bound. You are already considered as husband and wife and the union can only be dissolved through death or divorce.[4] But before Mary and Joseph ever ‘know each other’ in the Biblical sense, before they ever come together in THAT way, Mary becomes pregnant.

Imagine this scenario with me, if you will – men in particular: you are engaged, you have not had relations with your fiancée and all of a sudden you find out that she is pregnant. What would you do? What would you say? What would you feel? What would you think? What would you think and what would you do if your girlfriend to whom you are engaged becomes pregnant – and not by you? Would you still get married? Joseph, when he finds out that Mary is pregnant, is planning to call off the wedding altogether. Verse 19 says that he wants to do this quietly so as to not bring any disgrace upon Mary. Joseph is a righteous man.

Then something happens. Joseph has a dream. He dreams about an angel and in the dream this angel tells Joseph that he should ‘take Mary home as his wife’, Verse 20, ‘because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit’. He then dreams about what to name this child and how this son will save people from even their sins. It is now that Joseph has a number of decisions to make.
1)      Does he believe in visions in general and does he believe in this vision in particular?
2)      Does he believe that an angel actually has spoken to him and does he believe that what this angel has told him is true?
3)      And how will he respond to his belief? Will he ignore his conviction that this vision is from God and press on with the separation/divorce anyway or will he accept the commission given to him from God through a messenger in a dream? What would you do? Do you believe in your dreams?

Joseph does. Joseph is a righteous man. When Joseph awakes from his sleep, Verse 24, he does everything the angel from the Lord tells him to do including taking Mary home as his wife and not having any sexual relations with her until after this child is born. This is Joseph. Joseph is a righteous man. He follows his dream. He follows God.

2) Herod[5]
The second character’s response to the news of the birth of Christ that we are looking at in our story today is Herod. Herod is not a carpenter like Joseph. Herod is a regional king. He works for the Romans and he is known throughout history as ‘Herod the Great’. Herod the Great is the political leader at this time and in this place. He is a politician of his era and as such is involved in all the political intrigue of his era in all the ways that political intrigue is carried out in his era (cf. Josephus, Bellum ii.10–13; cf. also Josephus, Antiquities xvii. 224, 229, 250, 304, 307, 340).[6] He is a king but his job is no more secure than that of a contemporary politician in a minority government and Herod defends his title and his job no less vigorously than our present day leaders: in order to secure his position Herod needs to back the right horse and defeat all his rivals (cf. Josephus, Antiquities i.358). He – like many contemporary politicians – switches his allegiances more than once as to whom he backs for Emperor – first he backs Mark Anthony’s (and Cleopatra’s) coalition government and later crosses the floor to support Octavian, a.k.a. Caesar Augustus.[7] Herod the Great is a king who left behind a good legacy of building and growth but he is also an adept politician, cruel and insecure. His title awarded to him by Caesar Augustus is Herod, King of the Jews.[8]

Imagine with me what it must have been like for him. Imagine, you have the job that you have fought hard for all your life and your job title is that of ‘King of the Jews’ and these privileged academics – these magi - come up to you and, Matthew 2:2, they ask “Where is the one who has been born King of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and have come to worship him.” Imagine, you have the job that you have fought hard for all your life and your job is ‘King of the Jews’ – and you are not even a full Jew by birth - and these strangers come up to you and ask to meet your replacement, the new King of the Jews. How would you react?

I was a dishwasher once, for about a week as a teenager; the job didn’t go well and I didn’t get along with my co-worker and one day I meet a friend for coffee; he is excited as he tells me that ha has just been hired for a job at this same restaurant. When we talk for a while it becomes apparent that they have hired him for my job. That is how I found out that I was going to be fired. This could be what it is like for Herod when he hears this news that a there is going to be a new king of the Jews - except that Herod actually likes his (and he also probably never dunked his co-worker in a sink full of dirty water). This news that there is a new king of the Jews is a shock to him. This news is a threat to him. Current kings can be killed when new kings take over. Herod is the current king of the Jews. He hasn’t just had a son; so who is this new King of the Jews that has just been born? If you were Herod, what would you do? What would you say? What would you feel? What would you think?

Matthew records, 2:3, that when Herod hears this news he is disturbed and all of Jerusalem is disturbed with him. They and he immediately do their research. Herod, Verse 4, immediately calls for the “people’s chief priests and teachers of the Law, he asked them where the Christ was to be born.” He knows that the people are waiting for a leader to deliver thFem. Many people are expecting a Messiah, a political leader who will deliver them from the Romans. The Romans, remember, are the Superpower of their day and they are the ones who, with their military might, are keeping King Herod in power. If the Romans go, so probably does Herod. When he finds out where this Messiah, this Christ, this new king is to be born from the people’s chief priests and teachers of the Law (Matthew 2:6), he calls a secret meeting with these Magi to find out when it was that this star appeared (Matthew 2:7); Herod has a plan. Verse 8, he says to the Magi, “Go and make a careful search for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him.” The Magi do not do this – they outwit Herod (V. 15). Herod is likely scared. Herod is probably insecure. Herod is definitely, Verse 16, furious.  Herod is determined to eliminate his would-be-rival so Herod sends in the troops. The military massacres male babies two years old and younger – in order to wipe out all the male children who were born in the possible timeframe that this new king of the Jews was supposed to have been born. This is Herod’s reaction.

3) Magi
The third response to the news of the coming of the King of the Jews that we are looking at this morning is that of the Magi. Like we said earlier: magi are astrologers, astronomers, or wise men (cf. Daniel 2:2,10; Acts 8:9; 13:6,8). Our word ‘magic’, interestingly enough comes from the same root as ‘magi’. In Acts 13:6,8, this same word, ‘magoi’, is actually translated ‘magicians’[9]. In the Christmas story traditionally these magi are commonly known as ‘we three kings’ (ca. 225 CE Tertullian called them kings[10]). Now – of course – there is no mention as to how many of these magi there are in this story. The Bible mentions that they bring three different kinds of gifts – gold, frankincense, and myrrh – but does not mention how many magi there were (Matthew 2:11). The word ‘magi’ is plural so presumably there are at least two of them but there could be 2 or 102 of them; we don’t know but we do know that they are learned people.

These learned people see this thing in the sky. They see this ‘star’. These magi, they probably aren’t Jews.[11] They come from the east (cf. Philippians 2:10-11). Remember that travel isn’t easy in that day and age: they can’t just hop a flight or drive the Trans-Palestine superhighway to Jerusalem. These wise men realize somehow from their studies of the world around them that the King of the Jews has been born (cf. Numbers 24:17, Daniel 9:25, John 4:25,Romans 1).[12] What do they do when they discover this? Remember that they probably aren’t Jews and they don’t live in the area. They probably are men of privilege; who else has time to devote to study and travel in this way in this time in this place? What do these privileged foreign academics do when they find out that a king of the Jews has been born? They come to worship him (Matthew 2:2; cf. TSA d. 2,4).

This is interesting. These men. They see the star (cf. Numbers 24:17). They realize somehow that the King of the Jews has been born, so where do they go to see him? They head to Jerusalem, the capital city of the province of Judea; they go to the palace where the king lives. This is where one would go to find a new king, isn’t it? This makes sense: a king would naturally be born to the family that lives in the royal palace in the royal city – That makes sense but in this instance by simply doing what makes sense, they are wrong (cf. Judges 21:25). The new king of the Jews is not born in the palace of the old king of the Jews. He is born about five miles out-of-town, just south of Jerusalem in a community known as Bethlehem in Judea (Matthew 2:5). Lest we give our academic friends too much of a tough time here, they quickly realize their error and make the necessary corrections (Matthew 2:9). Instead of relying on their own devices and falling prey to the plans of Herod, they pay attention to their dreams and they decide to follow God’s star to the place where He is taking them (Matthew 2:10-12).

After an interview or two with Herod (Matthew 2:1-9), the current King of the Jews, these learned Magi realize that not only is the new king of the Jews not with the old and current king of the Jews in the palace but they realize that the old and current king of Judea has no immediate idea of what they are talking about and King Herod even asks them in a subsequent interview to tell him what they find out when they find him (Matthew 2:8). Herod is up to something (Matthew 2:16). But the Magi are warned by God in a dream, they avoid Herod’s trap and they follow God’s star to where God is taking them and God is taking them to a house in Bethlehem where these gentiles meet the King of the Jews and present him with the gifts they brought with them (Matthew 2:11). These foreigners see the signs; they leave their homes and their lives to track down the young king and worship Him. These are the Magi.

What is your response?

These are the three different responses to the birth of Jesus that Matthew intertwines for us in our text today. And these are three different choices for us as we are faced with the reality of the Advent of Christ in our world today. What is our response to the news of Christ? Are we like Herod? Herod is a man of power, prestige and privilege in society. He doesn’t believe in the power of the Almighty God. Herod thinks he can take matters into his own hands and disregard the truth of what God has preordained. He is wrong. Instead of worshipping the Lord, he tries to rule his world himself. His plans are frustrated though and he is furious. Likewise today if we deny the reality of the Kingdom of God and the return of Christ and instead try to control our own world, in the end we may be furious and we will be frustrated because in the end every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord – whether we want to our not (Isaiah 45:23, Romans 14:11, Philippians 2:10). Jesus has already defeated sin and death. We do not want to make the same choice as Herod

Better are the choices of the Gentile Magi and the Judean Joseph in their responses to the news of the birth of the Christ. Joseph, a righteous man, has grown up in the faith. He knows that God can be trusted so when the almost inconceivable conception occurs, he draws on the teaching of his youth, he follows his dreams, he listens to God and he spends his life living with the Christ. This is a faith that each of us who grew up in the church should have. We have the Biblical record (cf. TSA d.1), we have the historical record, we have our personal experience, and we have a brain; so rather than chuck all that we have known and experienced out the window like the Herod, let us lean not on simply our own understanding (Proverbs 3:5) but let us trust instead in the power and majesty of our Lord.[13] And let us today and forever more, when we realize the power and majesty of the reality of Christ’s reign; let us, like the Magi, come and worship Him. This is my prayer for us today on this December 23rd some 2000 years after the birth of our Saviour, that indeed that we will realize from all the evidence around us the reality of Christ, cast all else aside and come to worship Him forevermore (cf. TSA d. 2,4).

Let us pray

---
[1] cf. Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Luke 1:26-37: Do You Believe?' Presented to the Nipawin Corps 14 December 2008. Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/12/luke-126-37-do-you-believe.html and Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Matthew 1:18-25: Do you believe?' Presented to each Nipawin and Tisdale Corps, 24 December 2007 and the CFOT chapel in Winnipeg, December 2006. Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/12/matthew-118-25-do-you-believe.html
[2] Walter W. Wessel and Ralph Earle, ‘Matthew’ in NIV Study Bible (Grand Rapids, Mi : Zondervan, 2002), note on Matthew 1:19, p. 1467.
[3] cf. R. Alan Culpepper, Luke (NIB 8: Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1995), 51 and E. Earle Ellis, 71. Betrothal is not quite like engagements of today. In those days a man and his wife were committed to each other at the engagement ceremony. They did have a public ceremony with witnesses and the more. They did each gain a marital status, complete with rights and responsibilities and if Joseph had died after their engagement ceremony but prior to their marriage ceremony, Mary would still be considered a widow with all the responsibilities and rights (or lack thereof) of a widow. The betrothal was very different then anything we have today and even though Mary would be Joseph’s legal wife, after this engagement ceremony rather than going off to live with one’s husband, the wife usually returned to her father’s household for a period of up to a year.
[4] M. Eugene Boring, ‘Matthew’ (NIB VIII: Nashville, Tennessee: Abingdon Press, 1995), 134.
[5] cf. Captain Michael, 'Luke 19:11-27: Time, Talent and Treasure Series, Part 2: Employee Evaluation: What About the Slaves?'  Presented to the Swift Current Corps, 19 September 2010 Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2010/09/luke-1911-27-time-talent-and-treasure.html
[6] Cf. R. Alan Culpepper, Luke (NIB 8: Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1995), 363.
[7] Jona Lendering, 'King Herod the Great', cited 23 December 2010. Available on-line: http://www.livius.org/he-hg/herodians/herod_the_great02.html
[8] cf. Leon Morris: ‘Luke: An Introduction and Commentary’, Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1988 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 3), S. 290 and Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Luke/Exposition of Luke/V. Teaching and Travels Toward Jerusalem (9:51-19:44)/F. Final Approach to Jerusalem (18:31-19:44)/4. Parable of the ten minas (19:11-27), Book Version: 4.0.2
[9] Douglas R.A. Hare, Matthew (Interpretation: Louisville, Kentucky: John Knox Press, 1993), 13.
[10] Ralph L. Smith ‘Magi’ in Holman Bible Dictionary, Editor, Trent C. Butler, (Holman Bible Publishers: Nashville, Tenn., 1991), 910.
[11] Walter W. Wessel and Ralph Earle, note on 2:2, 1467, and Douglas R.A. Hare, Interpretation:  ‘Matthew’, 13.
[12] Cf. Exposition of the Gospel According to Luke (NTC: Baker Academic: Grand Rapids Michigan, 2007), 155.
[13] Cf. France, R. T.: Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1985 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 1), S. 76: In fact the aim of the formula-quotations in chapter 2 seems to be primarily apologetic, explaining some of the unexpected features in Jesus’ background, particularly his geographical origins. It would be a strange apologetic which invented ‘facts’ in order to defend them!