Friday, December 24, 2010

Matthew 1:18-2:18: What is your choice?

Presented to the Swift Current Corps on 26 December 2010
and 23 December 2013 by Captain Michael Ramsay

Click here to read the 23 December 2013 version: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2013/12/matthew-118-218-what-is-your-choice.html

Click here to read the shorter 25 December 2014 and 26 December 2015, 614 Toronto version: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2014/12/matthew-118-218-what-is-your-choice.html
 
Click here to read the 26 December 2021 Alberni Valley version: https://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2021/12/matthew-118-218-whats-your-choice.html
   
In this passage that we have just read, Matthew’s version of the Christmas story, we are faced with three responses to the miracle of the birth of Christ, the coming of the Messiah:
1) That of Joseph (his legal father),
2) Herod (King of Judea), and
3) Some magi (astrologers, astronomers, magicians or wise men, traditionally ‘we three kings’).
I want to look a little bit today at their three different responses to the news that Jesus was to be born and the news that he was actually born.

1) Joseph[1]
First we have Joseph: Joseph is a carpenter/stone mason. He is from the tribe of Judah and – of course – a famous ancestor of note of his is King David. Matthew records for us a few things about Joseph; we are told in our text today that Joseph, verse 19, is righteous. In our world these days when we think of a righteous person… if someone were to tell you that this person that they know is righteous… if someone were to say this visitor that we have here today is a righteous woman or man, what would we think that they would be like? They would pray, read the Bible, love God and love their neighbour (cf. Luke 10:27)? All of the above probably would probably be true of them and more. This was very much what it would have meant for Joseph too. Joseph served God and to the first century Jews righteousness meant that one was very good at keeping the religious law of the day.[2]

Matthew tells us also, Verse 1:18, that Joseph is pledged to be married to a girl named Mary[3] - Now, betrothal in first century is not like it is today. When you are engaged then you are already bound. You are already considered as husband and wife and the union can only be dissolved through death or divorce[4] but before Mary and Joseph ever ‘know each other’ in the Biblical sense, before they ever come together in THAT way, Mary becomes pregnant. Imagine this scenario with me, if you will – men in particular: you are engaged, you have not had relations with your fiancĂ©e and all of a sudden you find out that she is pregnant. What would you do? What would you say? What would you feel? What would you think? What would you think and what would you do if your girlfriend to whom you are engaged becomes pregnant – and not by you? Would you still get married? Joseph, when he finds out that Mary is pregnant, is planning to call off the wedding altogether. Verse 19 says that he wants to do this quietly so as to not bring any disgrace upon Mary. He is a righteous man.

Then something happens. Joseph has a dream. He dreams about an angel and in the dream this angel tells Joseph that he should ‘take Mary home as his wife’, Verse 20, ‘because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit’. He then dreams about what to name this child and how this son will save people from even their sins. It is now that Joseph has a number of decisions to make.
1) Does he believe in visions in general and does he believe in this vision in particular?
2) Does he believe that an angel actually has spoken to him and does he believe that what this angel has told him is true?
3) And how will he respond to his belief? Will he ignore his conviction that this vision is from God and press on with the separation/divorce anyway or will he accept the commission given to him from God through a messenger in a dream? What would you do? Do you believe in your dreams?

Joseph does. Joseph is a righteous man. When Joseph awakes from his sleep, Verse 24, he does everything the angel from the Lord tells him to do including taking Mary home as his wife and not having any sexual relations with her until this child is born. This is Joseph. Joseph is a righteous man. He follows his dream. He follows God.

2) Herod[5]
The second character’s response to the news of the birth of Christ that we are looking at in our story today is Herod. Herod is not a carpenter like Joseph. Herod is a regional king. He works for the Romans and he is known throughout history as ‘Herod the Great’. Herod the Great is the political leader at this time and in this place. He is a politician of his era and as such is involved in all the political intrigue of his era in all the ways that political intrigue is carried out in his era (cf. Josephus, Bellum ii.10–13; cf. also Josephus, Antiquities xvii. 224, 229, 250, 304, 307, 340).[6] He is a king but his job is no more secure than that of a contemporary politician in a minority government and Herod defends his title and his job no less vigorously than our present day leaders: in order to secure his position Herod needs to back the right horse and defeat all his rivals (cf. Josephus, Antiquities i.358). He – like many contemporary politicians – switches his allegiances more than once as to whom he backs for Emperor – first he backs Mark Anthony’s (and Cleopatra’s) coalition government and later crosses the floor to support Octavius, a.k.a. Caesar Augustus.[7] Herod the Great is a king who left behind a good legacy of building and growth but he is also an adept politician, cruel and insecure. His title awarded to him by Caesar Augustus is Herod, King of the Jews.[8]

Imagine with me what it must have been like for him. Imagine, you have the job that you have fought hard for all your life and your job is that of ‘King of the Jews’ and these privileged academics – the Magi - come up to you and, Matthew 2:2, they ask “Where is the one who has been born King of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and have come to worship him.” Imagine, you have the job that you have fought hard for all your life and your job is that of ‘King of the Jews’ – and you are not even a Jew by birth - and these strangers come up to you ask to meet your replacement, the new King of the Jews. How would you react?

I was a dishwasher once, for about a week as a teenager; the job didn’t go well and I didn’t get along with my co-worker and one day when I meet a friend for coffee, he is excited as he tells me that they have just hired him for a job at this same restaurant. When we talk for a while it becomes apparent that they have hired him for my job at this restaurant. That is how I found out I was going to be fired. This could be what it was like for Herod when he heard this news that a there was going to be a new king of the Jews - except that Herod actually liked the job he was doing (and probably never dunked his co-worker in a sink full of dirty water). This news that there was a new king of the Jews is a shock to him. This news is a threat to him. Current kings can be killed when new kings take over. Herod is the current king of the Jews. He hasn’t just had a son; so who is this NEW King of the Jews that has just been born? If you were Herod, what would you do? What would you say? What would you feel? What would you think?

Matthew records, 2:3, that when Herod heard this news he was disturbed and all of Jerusalem was disturbed with him. They and he immediately do their research. Herod, Verse 4, immediately calls for the ‘people’s chief priests and teachers of the law, he asked them where the Christ was to be born.’ He knows that the people are waiting for a leader to deliver them. Many people are expecting a Messiah, a political leader who would deliver them from the Romans. The Romans, remember, are the Superpower of their day and they are the ones who, with their military might, are keeping King Herod in power. If they go, so probably does he. When he finds out where this Messiah, this Christ, this new king is to be born from the people’s chief priests and teachers of the law (Matthew 2:6), he calls a secret meeting with the Magi to find out when it was that this star appeared (Matthew 2:7); Herod has a plan. Verse 8, he says to the magi, “Go and make a careful search for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him.” The magi did not do this – they instead, Verse 15, outwit Herod. Herod is likely scared. Herod is probably insecure. Herod is definitely, Verse 16, furious. He is determined to eliminate his would-be-rival so he sends in the troops. The military massacres male babies two years old and younger – in order to wipe out all the male children who were born there in the possible time frame that this new king of the Jews was supposed to be born. This is Herod’s reaction.

3) The MagiThe third response to the news of the coming of the King of the Jews that we are looking at this morning is that of the magi. Like we said earlier, the magi are astrologers, astronomers or wise men (cf. Daniel 2:2,10; Acts 8:9; 13:6,8). Our word ‘magic’, interestingly enough comes from the same root as ‘magi’. In Acts 13:6,8, this same word, ‘magoi’, is actually translated ‘magicians’[9]. In the Christmas story traditionally these magi are commonly known as ‘we three kings’ (ca. 225 CE Tertullian called them kings[10]). Now – of course – there is no mention as to how many of these magi there are in this story. The Bible mentions that they bring three different kinds of gifts – gold, frankincense, and myrrh – but does not mention how many magi there were (Matthew 2:11). The word ‘magi’ is plural so presumably there are at least two of them but there could be 2 or 102 of them, we don’t know but we do know that they are learned people.

These learned people see this thing in the sky. They see this ‘star’. These magi, they probably aren’t Jews.[11] They come from the east (cf. Philippians 2:10-11). Remember that travel isn’t easy in that day and age: they can’t just hop a flight or drive the Trans-Palestine superhighway to Jerusalem. These wise men realize somehow from their studies of the world around them that the King of the Jews has been born (cf. Numbers 24:17, Daniel 9:25, John 4:25,Romans 1).[12] What do they do when they discover this? Remember that they probably aren’t Jews and they don’t live in the area. They probably are men of privilege; who else has time to devote to study and travel in this way in this time and place? What do these privileged foreign academics do when they find out that a King of the Jews has been born? They come to worship him (Matthew 2:2; cf. TSA d. 2,4).

This is interesting. These men. They see the star (cf. Numbers 24:17). They realize somehow that the King of the Jews has been born, so where do they go to see him? They head to Jerusalem, the capital city of the province of Judea, and to the palace where the king lives. This is where one would go to find the new king, isn’t it? This makes sense to them, like it would make sense to us – a king would be born to the family that lives in the palace in the royal city – That makes sense but in this instance by simply doing what makes sense to them, they are wrong (cf. Judges 21:25). The new king of the Jews is not born in the palace of the old king of the Jews. He is born about five miles out-of-town, just south of Jerusalem in a community known as Bethlehem in Judea (Matthew 2:5). Lest we give our academic friends too much of a tough time here, they quickly realize their error and make the necessary corrections (Matthew 2:9). Instead of relying on their own devices and falling prey to the plans of Herod, they pay attention to their dreams and decide to follow God’s star to the place where He is taking them (Matthew 2:10-12).

After an interview or two with Herod (Matthew 2:1-9), the current king of the Jews, these learned magi realize that not only is the new king of the Jews not with the old king of the Jews in the palace but they realize that he has no immediate idea of what they are talking about and King Herod even asks them in a subsequent interview to tell him what they find out when they find him (Matthew 2:8). Herod is up to something (Matthew 2:16). But the magi are warned by God in a dream, avoid Herod’s trap and follow God’s star to where God is taking them and He is taking them to a house in Bethlehem where these gentiles meet the King of the Jews and present him with the gifts they brought with them (Matthew 2:11). These foreigners see the signs, leave their homes and their lives to track down to young king and worship him. These are the magi.

What's Your Choice?These are the three different responses to the birth of Jesus that Matthew intertwines for us in the text that we are looking at today. And these are three choices for us as we are faced with the reality of the Advent of Christ in our world today. What is our response to the news of Christ? Are we like Herod? Herod was a man of power, prestige and privilege in society. He, like the contemporary atheist in that he didn’t believe in the power of the Almighty God. Herod thought he could take matters into his own hands and disregard the truth of what God has preordained. He was wrong. Instead of worshipping the Lord, he tried to rule his world himself. His plans were frustrated though and he was furious. Likewise today if we deny the reality of the Kingdom of God and the return of Christ and instead try to control our own world, in the end we may be furious and we will be frustrated because in the end every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord – whether we want to our not (Isaiah 45:23, Romans 14:11, Philippians 2:10). Jesus has already defeated sin and death. We do not want to make the same choice as Herod

Better are the choices of the Gentile magi and the Judean Joseph in their responses to the news of the birth of the Christ. Joseph, a righteous man, had grown up in the faith. He knew that God could be trusted so when the almost inconceivable conception occurs, he draws on the teaching of his youth, he follows his dreams, he listens to God and he spends his life living with the Christ. This is a faith that all of us who grow up in the church should have. We have the Biblical record (cf. TSA d.1), we have the historical record, we have our personal experience, and we have a brain; so rather than chuck all that we have known and experienced out the window, like the Herod’s of his world and the atheists of ours, let us lean not on simply our own understanding (Proverbs 3:5) but let us trust in the power and majesty of our Lord.[13] And let us all today and forever more, when we realize the power and majesty of the reality of Christ’s reign, let us like the Magi come and worship him. This is my prayer for us today on this Boxing Day some 2000 years after the birth of our Saviour, that indeed we realize from all the evidence around us the reality of Christ, cast all else aside and come to worship Him forevermore (cf. TSA d. 2,4). In Jesus Name, Amen.

www.sheepspeak.com/


---

[1] cf. Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Luke 1:26-37: Do You Believe?' Presented to the Nipawin Corps 14 December 2008. Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/12/luke-126-37-do-you-believe.html and Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Matthew 1:18-25: Do you believe?' Presented to each Nipawin and Tisdale Corps, 24 December 2007 and the CFOT chapel in Winnipeg, December 2006. Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/12/matthew-118-25-do-you-believe.html
[2] Walter W. Wessel and Ralph Earle, ‘Matthew’ in NIV Study Bible (Grand Rapids, Mi : Zondervan, 2002), note on Matthew 1:19, p. 1467.
[3] cf. R. Alan Culpepper, Luke (NIB 8: Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1995), 51 and E. Earle Ellis, 71. Betrothal is not quite like engagements of today. In those days a man and his wife were committed to each other at the engagement ceremony. They did have a public ceremony with witnesses and the more. They did each gain a marital status, complete with rights and responsibilities and if Joseph had died after their engagement ceremony but prior to their marriage ceremony, Mary would still be considered a widow with all the responsibilities and rights (or lack thereof) of a widow. The betrothal was very different then anything we have today and even though Mary would be Joseph’s legal wife, after this engagement ceremony rather than going off to live with one’s husband, the wife usually returned to her father’s household for a period of up to a year.
[4] M. Eugene Boring, ‘Matthew’ (NIB VIII: Nashville, Tennessee: Abingdon Press, 1995), 134.
[5] cf. Captain Michael, 'Luke 19:11-27: Time, Talent and Treasure Series, Part 2: Employee Evaluation: What About the Slaves?' Presented to the Swift Current Corps, 19 September 2010 Available on-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2010/09/luke-1911-27-time-talent-and-treasure.html
[6] Cf. R. Alan Culpepper, Luke (NIB 8: Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1995), 363.
[7] Jona Lendering, 'King Herod the Great', cited 23 December 2010. Available on-line: http://www.livius.org/he-hg/herodians/herod_the_great02.html
[8] cf. Leon Morris: ‘Luke: An Introduction and Commentary’, Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1988 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 3), S. 290 and Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Luke/Exposition of Luke/V. Teaching and Travels Toward Jerusalem (9:51-19:44)/F. Final Approach to Jerusalem (18:31-19:44)/4. Parable of the ten minas (19:11-27), Book Version: 4.0.2
[9] Douglas R.A. Hare, Matthew (Interpretation: Louisville, Kentucky: John Knox Press, 1993), 13.
[10] Ralph L. Smith ‘Magi’ in Holman Bible Dictionary, Editor, Trent C. Butler, (Holman Bible Publishers: Nashville, Tenn., 1991), 910.
[11] Walter W. Wessel and Ralph Earle, note on 2:2, 1467, and Douglas R.A. Hare, Interpretation: ‘Matthew’, 13.
[12] Cf. Exposition of the Gospel According to Luke (NTC: Baker Academic: Grand Rapids Michigan, 2007), 155.
[13] Cf. France, R. T.: Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1985 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 1), S. 76: In fact the aim of the formula-quotations in chapter 2 seems to be primarily apologetic, explaining some of the unexpected features in Jesus’ background, particularly his geographical origins. It would be a strange apologetic which invented ‘facts’ in order to defend them!

Friday, December 10, 2010

Psalm 146: Trust The Faithful Orange

Third homily in the Heaven Scent series.

Presented to the Swift Current Corps 12 December 2010.

By Captain Michael Ramsay

.

Last week we spoke about the justice that comes with salvation and how it is our responsibility as servants of the Lord to be just (Psalm 72:1-7)[1] and verses 5-10 of Psalm 146, which we read a little bit earlier, tell us how and what this holiness looks like when we do put our trust in the Lord. These verse 5-10 are actually the verses of the psalm that are associated with the third week in advent this year but I was struck by verse 3: “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.” So that is what we will talk about today.

Trust is an interesting thing and it is important. I love wearing my uniform, it is a symbol of trust and as we who are wearing them continue to deal openly and fairly with people, it continues to grow as a symbol of trust in the community. The trust that we wearing the uniform garner for it comes in direct proportion to our service to the Lord while wearing it. God has been able to use me to help diffuse many varied and difficult situations involving armed people, disgruntled people, intoxicated people, and violent people, through the trust embodied in this uniform of one who serves the Lord in His army. In one community in which I served, our soldiers were doing such a solid job of living up to that trust that was placed in our uniforms that other evangelical clergy lamented to me that they did not have a uniform to wear. At times it can be like a Superhero costume.

I did not always have my Superhero costume though. I was not always an Officer. I was not always a soldier. I remember once when I was in elementary school. We were at a Christian camp. They were teaching us this very important value of trust and reflecting the truth and the trustworthiness of God. We did a number of these trust exercises, some of them involving blindfolds. We were to take turns being blindfolded and being led around. When it was my turn to be blindfolded – well, I peeked. Trust took a little while to develop for me but my partner – he passed with flying colours. This guy was the epitome of trust and trustworthiness. I led him everywhere and he never once peaked. How do I know he never peeked? Well, I led him into a building and we walked through a door and when he took off his blindfold I wasn’t there and he happened to be in the middle of the girls change room – he was quite surprised when he took the blindfold off. He was more than a little embarrassed but this person really did pass the trust test. He trusted me in those days. He passed the trust test not only in letting me lead him into this spot without even peeking; but after I did this I said to him, “Okay, okay, let’s do this properly this time” and he put the blindfold on and he didn’t peek this time either. How do I know that he didn’t peek this time either? Because… When we were back outside, I walked right behind my trusting blindfolded friend climbing ever higher and higher on the steps in the centre of the camp and out on this platform when all of a sudden one of the leaders called out ‘get off of that diving board…’

Psalm 146:3 “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.” Actually I don’t think I got right to the diving board; I don’t remember getting any closer than the pool deck in reality but the idea is the same. My partner passed the trust test with glowing colours – I, however, did not. Praise the Lord that I changed - not only because of my life and my job nowadays but because there is absolutely nothing worse than an untrustworthy person. A person, who misrepresents the truth for whatever self-righteous reason, is a person that you can never give any responsibility to. That being said the lesson for today that is technically outside of the Advent reading (one has to love the freedom of being an evangelical at times) is from Psalm 146:3: “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.”

Last week we spoke about King Solomon. There were these great blessings that were available to him and his reign, provided that he was just faithful in serving YHWH by providing justice and salvation to the poor (Psalm 72). One who reflects the love and life of the Lord, our text tells us today will uphold the cause of the oppressed and give food to the hungry (Psalm 146:7; cf. Psalm 9:9, 10:18, 103:6 and Psalm 17:14, 34:10, 107:9, Isaiah 49:10). The LORD will set the prisoners free (Psalm 146:7; cf. Psalm 68:6, 79:11, 102:20, 107:10-14; Isaiah 42:7), give sight to the blind (Psalm 146:8; cf. Isaiah 29:18, 35:5, 42:7, 43:8), watch over the marginalized and frustrate the ways of the wicked (Psalm 146:9; cf. Psalm 104:35, 145:20 and Deuteronomy 10:18; Isaiah 1:17, 9:17; Jeremiah 22:16; James 1:17). None of Solomon’s successors did this (until Jesus! See Matthew 11:4-6) Solomon did not do this. Solomon failed. Instead of setting the captives free, he actually enslaved his own people (1 Kings 5:13, cf. 4:6, 9:15, 12:1-4). In the end this political leader from 1000 BCE, was remembered by the author of 1 Kings as one who did evil in the eyes of the Lord (1 Kings 11). Not an epitaph that any leader should want. And a good reminder for us: Psalm 146:3, “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.”

Speaking of (evil?) political leaders, in my home province of British Colombia something interesting has happened in the last couple of months. They had an election not too long ago. The governing party was returned to power. Almost immediately afterward they won, they rid themselves of the person who had just led them to victory in that election – they pushed the premier to resign. Now this political turmoil is not uncommon in western democracies; I think we can all name off the tops of our heads politicians who have been metaphorically stabbed in the back and politically purged in Canada: Stephane Dion, Jean Cretien, Joe Clark, ... Backroom dealings and underhandedness – at least since the 1950s - sometimes seem to be inherent to Canadian politics and many politicians. The interesting thing in BC right now is that this week, after the government had purged itself of its leader there was a successful revolt in the opposition party too and they also sacrificed their leader. Usually in Canada when one party decides to kill itself by falling on the sword of party revolt, the other one just watches and rejoices in its good position. In BC this past week, the opposition party decided otherwise: they thought, I guess, if the government is going to implode with internal decent, maybe we should too. Politics. Democracy.[2] These comments are all somewhat tongue-in-cheek of course, and I haven’t lived in BC in quite a while so I really don’t know what has been happening there or why these revolts are taking place but it struck me as interesting that the two parties with seats there would ditch their leaders at exactly the same time. I think some of this is because we put our leaders on pedestals and have unreasonable expectations, forgetting the advice of Psalm 146:3 “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.”

Every election in the western world many of us who bother to vote seem to continually forget the wisdom of Psalm 146:3. The recent myth of Obama is a great example of this. Leading up to the previous US presidential election, reading their press, it sounded like they thought he was the second coming of the Messiah. The world too seemed to buy into this: you remember that they gave Obama, who is the leader of the world’s most expensive and most active armed forces; they gave Obama, who in one of his very first acts of office bombed a foreign country – they gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize. What were they thinking? We’re they thinking that the tiger of a Superpower would change its stripes as fast as it changes its president. Obama is no Prince of Peace. He is no Messiah. In the last election his party was trounced. This is no knock against him personally; he is just a mortal man. Psalm 146:3: “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.” Lest you think I am partisan, I have another example of people becoming disillusioned with leaders after putting a false hope in them. After George Bush Senior invaded Iraq in the first Iraq War he, I seem to recall, had the highest popularity rating ever to that point in US history, many people put their faith in him; he lost the next election. Psalm 146:3: “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.”

In King Solomon’s reign as King of the United Kingdom of Israel and Judah his responsibilities and his failures are compounded by the fact that he is not just a political leader; more importantly he is also supposed to be a spiritual leader just like the Queen of the UK is given the title ‘Defender of the Faith’ (cf. Deuteronomy 17:18-20).[3] The English monarch is traditionally in charge of the military, the government, and the Church of England: even more so with Solomon. People had high expectations of Solomon and his reign and he did not measure up (cf. Psalm 72, 1 Kings 11).

In our world today we see this all the time. We see people wrongly believing that if a certain person is elected as leader of one of the world’s superpowers that overnight the nature of that superpower will change from a profit-seeking, war-making machine to a God-fearing, peacemaking regime that looks after the poor. It is just not true.[4] Likewise in Saskatchewan and in Canada, as good as our local MPs and MLAs may or may not be, they will not significantly change the course of history and save us all from poverty, sin, and the evils of society. They will not heal the lame and give sight to the blind (cf. Matthew 11:4-6) therefore, Psalm 146:3, “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.”

Likewise we can’t put any spiritual leaders on a pedestal. I cannot save anyone. Your favourite author cannot save anyone. Your favourite televangelist cannot save anyone. When we look to political leaders or spiritual leaders for our salvation, we will be disappointed. They cannot save us. I have heard many stories of people who have wrongly put their faith in their pastors instead of in Christ and when their pastor sins, they become disillusion and fall away (cf. TSA Doctrines 2,6,9). Can anything be more sad than that? Psalm 146:3: “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.”

In The Salvation Army soon and very soon we have a High Council meeting in London, England; where we will attempt to discern God’s choice for the next General of The Salvation Army. While trusting that God will raise up the right person for this role and that our leaders will acknowledge God’s choice in this we must not forget the warning of Psalm 146:3: “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save.” We must put our faith in God, not in men and women.

This brings us to our ‘heaven scent’ for today. First let’s review. What was our ‘heaven scent’ last week? (Gingerbread) And what did that represent? (Justice and Salvation). The first week of Advent, what was our ‘heaven scent’? (The Evergreen) And what id that represent for us? (Everlasting Life) This week I have a little quiz for us – sort of a word association, rhyming quiz. I will say a word and we will see which side of the congregation can come up with a rhyming word first:


1) Fruit
2) Heat
3) Monkey
4) Grape
5) Orange


There isn’t an English word that rhymes with Orange. Just like, as Psalm 146:3 says, there isn’t a person who can save us. Only God can save us and He does this through the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ our Lord for whose return we are eagerly waiting and this waiting is what Advent is all about. The scent today in our ‘heaven scent’ series today is oranges. Oranges, we are going to associate with the faithfulness of God (Psalm 146:3, 6). We cannot put our trust in people for they cannot save us. We must put our faith in God who is faithful even when we are faithless (Psalm 146:6; Romans 3:3,4). He is the Orange – the one for whom there is no rhyme. He is the Orange – the one for whom there is no match. He is the Orange – the one for whom there is no equal. He is the Orange. His faithfulness stands alone and Salvation comes from no one other than from God through Jesus Christ our Lord. There is no other name by which (hu)man(kind) can be saved (Acts 4:12; cf. Joel 2:32; Acts 2:21; Romans 10:13). So then, this week and forever more let us not put our faith in princes, in mortal men and women who cannot save but instead let us put us faith in Christ and in Christ alone.

Let us pray.

http://www.sheepspeak.com/


---
[1] Captain Michael Ramsay, ‘Psalm 72:1-7: Gingerbread Cookies of Justice and Salvation’, presented to the Swift Current Corps, 05 December 2010. Available on-line at http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2010/12/psalm-721-7-gingerbread-cookies-of.html
[2] God’s country is to be ruled as a theocracy (rule by God) not as the people-centered rule of the other nations (i.e. democracy ‘rule [by] people’). Cf. Isaac Watts, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Psalms/Exposition of Psalms/BOOK II: Psalms 42-72/Psalm 72: The Glory of the Davidic Kingdom/I. Prayer for Davidic Kingship (72:1), Book Version: 4.0.2
[3] cf. Isaac Watts, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Psalms/Exposition of Psalms/BOOK II: Psalms 42-72/Psalm 72: The Glory of the Davidic Kingdom/I. Prayer for Davidic Kingship (72:1), Book Version: 4.0.2
[4] Cf. Captain Michael Ramsay, ‘Vote for Jesus’ in the Journal of Aggressive Christianity. Available on-line at http://www.sheepspeak.com/Michael_Ramsay_JAC.htm#Vote for Jesus

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Psalm 72:1-7: Gingerbread Cookies of Justice and Salvation

Second homily in the Heaven Scent series.
Presented to the Swift Current Corps 05 December 2010.
By Captain Michael Ramsay

We are looking at Psalm 72:1-7 today: This is Canada’s psalm. When I next preach on Canada Day (Dominion Day) I will most likely preach on this Psalm:

Canada’s motto, “A Mari usque ad Mare” is Latin for “from sea to sea.” It comes from Psalm 72. Where, in verse 8, it declares, “He shall have dominion also from sea to sea.” That is a key underpinning of our society and of our founding identity, the idea that God himself, through the Canadian government, shall have dominion from sea to sea.
This is neat. It is not some accident or coincident. It is intentional. Our country is intentionally founded on the Word of God. And another interesting thing - Sir Samuel Leonard Tilley, the father of Confederation that proposed the name for our country and that that name - the Dominion of Canada - be based on this Scripture would have made a great Salvationist.
He wasn’t one but he would have made a good one. Tilley was a Sunday-school teacher and lifelong temperance advocate; he was one of the so-called "Smashers", who tried to introduce prohibition to New Brunswick in the 1850s
.[1]

This is an important, relatively recent historical application of this psalm but we can speak more about that on Canada Day. Today is the second Sunday of Advent, so we will be looking at this passage through a slightly different lens: that of waiting for the Messiah to come and of waiting for the Messiah to come again.

This passage of scripture, Psalm 72, refers to the Messianic Hope. It speaks about Justice and Salvation for the poor and needy. It is the hope of the nations. It is about the unconditional promise: the inevitability of Christ’s return, what his kingdom looks like now and what it will look like when he come back. This is what we will concentrate on shortly but Psalm 72 is also about a conditional promise to King Solomon (cf. Leviticus 25,26; Deuteronomy 6:1-5, 20-25; 8:1, 19-20; 2 Chronicles 36:20-21; cf. also Amos 3,4).[2]

This psalm is attributed by some to Solomon and by other scholars to Solomon’s father. Either King Solomon or King David could be the author of this psalm – if you look in your Bibles you may notice that some translations will say at the beginning of this psalm, the words ‘of Solomon’ but looking at the bottom, in verse 20, it reads, ‘this concludes the prayers of David son of Jesse’[3] (Psalm 72:20) - the language around authorship is actually inconclusive.[4] The psalm was probably composed as Solomon’s father, King David, lay dying and was in the process of rejecting his older son (Adonijah), his High Priest (Abiathar), and his nephew who has been the commander of his armed forces since he was young (Joab). King David in the time this psalm was written was rejecting his older son, Adonijah, and his supporters’ claims to the throne and in the process securing the kingdom for Solomon, his younger son (­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­1 Kings 1).

If David is the author of this psalm, it is here that David pours out his heart as to what he hopes for in his chosen son’s, Solomon’s, reign. Solomon, as a king of God’s people, must live in accordance with the revelation from God. To this end Solomon as the Israelite king would receive a copy of the Law of God at his coronation (cf. Deuteronomy 17:18-20). This is important because God’s country is to be ruled as a theocracy (rule by God) not as the people-centered rule of the other nations (i.e. democracy ‘rule [by] people’).[5] Because of this, if you look at the first seven verses of Psalm 72 – especially verses 2-4, you will note that there must be Justice and Salvation for the poor and needy. We know that sadly Solomon failed in this commission to provide Justice and Salvation for the poor and needy as laid out for us in Psalm 72. He was not an YHWH-based theocrat who provided for the disenfranchised. Instead he made forced-labourers of his countrymen (1 Kings 5:13, cf. 4:6, 9:15, 12:1-4) and religious pluralism and syncretism were prevalent during his reign (1 Kings 11:1-13). There was even idol-worship in his own household (1 Kings 11:1-9). In the end, Solomon’s wives eventually led the king himself astray (1 Kings 11:4). He followed other gods and he did evil in the eyes of the LORD (1 Kings 11:5-6). The country did not live up to its holy designation and as a result the United Kingdom of Israel and Judah died with Solomon as the tribes of Israel were torn from his family line (1 Kings 11:11).

But there is more to contemplate in this psalm of promise than simply the failure to provide justice and salvation for the poor and needy and final disappointment of Solomon’s reign. There is still the promise of Christ, which was to come when this was written and is still to come again (prolepsis). John Wesley remarks in his commentary on the commission of Psalm 72, that the mentioned “…blessed fruit of this righteous government… together with peace, true religion [that] shall be established… throughout all generations, …[was] not fully accomplished ‘till Christ came.” [6] The assignment of a Kingdom of Righteousness was given to Solomon to start – he failed to finish it - but it is successfully completed by Christ (cf. Psalm 118:6,7; Hebrews 13:5) penultimately at his first coming and ultimately at his second. Psalm 72 finds its fulfilment not in the failings of Solomon but in the victory and triumph of Jesus the Messiah.

That being said, it is interesting that the New Testament nowhere specifically quotes Psalm 72 as Messianic though the picture painted here of the king and his realm is so close to the messianic prophecies of Isaiah (that we are very familiar with at this time of year; Isaiah 9, 11, 60–62) that if those passages are Messianic, so too must be this one. As a royal psalm, Psalm 72 prays for the reigning king but yet it is so far beyond the what was attained and seemingly even beyond what is humanly attainable that it suggest its fulfilment can be found only in Jesus, the Christ himself.[7]

This is important. Solomon, for whom this psalm was originaly composed, failed miserably in its commission to provide justice and salvation for the poor and needy (1 Kings 11:1-12). Canada, who at our foundation claimed for itself this same commission of Psalm 72 -judging by the poverty, crime, pride, greed, immorality and selfishness in our nation today (if not our province which by comparison is doing remarkably well)- is apparently likewise failing but where we are faithless still Christ is faithful and this is an important aspect of advent and of our waiting for the arrival and the return of Christ (Psalm 118:6,7, Romans 3:3,4, Hebrews 13:5; but cf. Hebrews 6:6). The familiar hymn ‘Jesus Shall Reign’ by Isaac Watts says:

Jesus shall reign wheree'er the sun
Does his successive journeys run;
His kingdom stretch from shore to shore,
Till moons shall wax and wane no more.[8]

What implication does the fact that this psalm is Messianic (as attested to also by the inclusion of this text in the liturgical churches lectionaries) have for us on this second Sunday of Advent today? I think the key application for us is as follows – I think Canada’s Founding Fathers had the right interpretation of it when they chose this psalm as our foundation rather than the atheistic/deistic principles of the American Revolution. Advent is about waiting and the idea relating to this psalm is for us emulate Christ while we are waiting for his return by providing justice and salvation for the poor and needy. Indeed in ordering our lives and our society after the will of God, we are preparing the world for Jesus’ return. As followers of Christ, this is our responsibility (cf. for ex. Matthew 21:23-32, 25:14-30, 31-46; Mark 3:33, Luke 12, 19:11-27, etc.).[9] We are the church and we should build our church so as to be a suitable home for Christ. We, as the Church, are also the ‘Bride of Christ’ and if we are going to remain married to Christ we should really spend some time with him growing in his love (TSA d.9). As we do this we will fulfill the promises of Psalm 72.

As we prepare our countries, our churches, and our lives for Christ’s return, this is what they will look like. There will be justice for the poor, Psalm 72:2, salvation –rescue and defence- for the needy, Verse 4, (cf. Exodus 23:6,11, Leviticus 19:10,15, 23:22, 27:8, Deuteronomy 15:4, 15:7, 15:11, 24:12-15, 1 Samuel 2:8, Psalms. 22:26, 34:6, 35:10, 82:3, Jeremiah 22:15–17, Isaiah 11:4, 61:1, Ezekiel 16:49, 18:12, 22:29, Amos 2:7, 4:1, 5:11-12, 8:4-6, Zechariah 7:10,Matthew 25:35ff, Luke 6:24-26...). Peace –Shalom- for God’s people, Verses 3 and 7 (cf. Isaiah 9:6);[10] there will then naturally be righteousness throughout our nation, Verses 1, 2, 3, and 7 (cf. Isaiah 9:5-7); and then Christ’s everlasting realm in the spirit of the evergreen, that we spoke about last week, will have begun (Psalm 72:5; cf. Psalm 122:1). This is important and this brings us to our scent today. This advent we are matching certain psalms and certain promises of God with certain scents or aromas. Last week what was the scent we concentrated on? The evergreen. What does the evergreen symbolise? Everlasting life.

Today our ‘heaven scent’ is gingerbread. Christmas gingerbread cookies are a connection to Christmas past. Did you know that the word for cookie came to English through Dutch settlers in North America? ‘Koek’ is Dutch for cake, so ‘koekje’ or cookie came to English, meaning ‘little cake’. Christmas cookies continue a long custom of serving winter-baked treats started by the Romans, Germanic tribes, and other civilizations even before they were Christianised. So this is interesting then: much like Booth said about music composed for non-Christian, secular society, “Why should the devil have all the best tunes?”[11] And “Secular music, do you say, belongs to the devil? Does it? Well, if it did I would plunder him for it, for he has no right to a single note of the whole seven...Every note, and every strain, and every harmony is divine, and belongs to us.”[12] Just as the music, so too the baking. Just as Salvationists had popular music claimed and reclaimed for Christ, Christians back as far as Roman days claimed and reclaimed cookies. The had cakes and cookies sanctified as symbols of worship of Lord and made this known by adding a ‘J’ to the top of the baking symbolizing that these are offerings to Jesus Christ. These cakes and cookies then were taken from the devil long ago and given to God.[13]

Gingerbread is our ‘heaven scent’ for today and in my own life, when I think of gingerbread cookies, my mind often goes to ginger snap cookies. I always associate ginger snap cookies with my Grandma. I can still to this day picture the house that my Papa (my grandfather) built on Shelbourne Street in Victoria, their kitchen and their cookie jar. The fact that I remember some of my grandmother’s baking fondly is really quite something. How should I put it? Let’s just say that the food was not the reason we went over to Grandma’s house at dinnertime – she could turn anything into a jellied salad: fruit and vegetables, ham, a casserole, an old tire, you name it, I’m sure it was there, jellied and on our plate at some point…but I do remember the gingersnap cookies fondly – maybe because they were almost the only thing not jellied at Grandma’s. These cookies really were something to look forward to at Grandma’s house and this is the heaven scent that I would like to leave us with this week.

Psalm 72 promises justice for the poor, salvation for the needy, peace (Shalom) for God’s people, and righteousness throughout our nation. Solomon’s attempt to produce this resulted in no better than a jellied salad appetizer; Canada’s claim to this seems to be at present nothing more than a jellied ham salad main course; but when Jesus first came to the world those ginger snap cookies were put in the oven, and as we in obedience to him providing justice for the poor and salvation for the needy (as we certainly have the opportunity to do around here at The Salvation Army at Christmas time!), this pleasing aroma of these cookies of justice and salvation fills the air. And still Jesus is coming back and when he does come back, he promises that we –his faithful followers- we shall all partake of these ginger snap cookies of justice and salvation for our eternal dessert (TSA d. 7-11). Advent is all about waiting and these ginger snap cookies of justice and salvation that we will savour for eternity with our Lord and Saviour are indeed worth waiting for.

Let us pray.

http://www.sheepspeak.com/

---
[1] Captain Michael Ramsay, 'Psalm 72: the Credit Card of Justice and Righteousness', presented to Nipawin and Tisdale Corps 01 July 2007. Available on-line at http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2007/08/psalm-72-credit-card-of-justice-and.html
[2] Cf. Willy Schottroff, “To Perceive, To Know,” in Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament, Volume 3 eds. Ernst Jenni and Claus Westermann (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 1997), p. 516 and Thomas E. McComiskey, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Amos/Introduction to Amos/Theological Values of Amos/The doctrine of election in Amos, Book Version: 4.0.2
[3] Cf. John H. Stek, ‘Psalms’ in NIB Study Bible (Grand Rapids, Mi.: Zondervan Publishing, 2002) Note on 72:20, page 866.
[4] Cf. Derek Kidner, Psalms 1-72: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1973 (Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries 15), S. 48
[5]Isaac Watts, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Psalms/Exposition of Psalms/BOOK II: Psalms 42-72/Psalm 72: The Glory of the Davidic Kingdom/I. Prayer for Davidic Kingship (72:1), Book Version: 4.0.2
[6]John Wesley, Notes on Psalm 72, Available on-line at http://www.christnotes.org/commentary.php?b=19&c=72&com=wes
[7] Derek Kidner, Psalms 1-72: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1973 (Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries 15), S. 273
[8] Isaac Watts, "Jesus Shall Reign" cited in Willem A. VanGemeren, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Psalms/Exposition of Psalms/BOOK II: Psalms 42-72/Psalm 72: The Glory of the Davidic Kingdom, Book Version: 4.0.2
[9] Cf. Andrew R. Morton, ‘Worship Resources, 6th of January: Epiphany: Isaiah 60:1-6; Psalm 721-7, 10-14; Ephesians 3:1-12’ in The Expository Times , Volume 119 Number 3 Pages 122-123.
[10] Andrew R. Morton, ‘Worship Resources, 6th of January: Epiphany: Isaiah 60:1-6; Psalm 721-7, 10-14; Ephesians 3:1-12’ in The Expository Times , Volume 119 Number 3, page 123
[11] The Salvation Army International Heritage Centre, “Why should the devil have all the best tunes?”, available on-line at http://www1.salvationarmy.org/heritage.nsf/36c107e27b0ba7a98025692e0032abaa/42d53ced9ec1583080256954004bff3e!OpenDocument
[12] From a War Cry article in 1880. Available on-line at http://www.ourchurch.com/view/?pageID=12281
[13] A Dash of Cinnamon, A Pinch of the Past, A Smidgen of the Future
By Kristin Johnson. Available on-line at http://ezinearticles.com/?A-Dash-of-Cinnamon,-A-Pinch-of-the-Past,-A-Smidgen-of-the-Future&id=16568