Presented to Tisdale Corps on March 30, 2008
and Nipawin Corps on April 6, 2008
By Captain Michael Ramsay
When we were in College back in Winnipeg, on Friday nights I used to help out with the street outreach at the Weetamah corps. We would walk around the streets at night to see who we could offer a warm meal, a hot chocolate or a place to stay down at the shelter (the Booth Centre) for the night. We then tell them about Jesus.
Now these nights usually go quite late -until 1 or 2 in the morning sometimes – and so at the end of a long week at the college, I am just exhausted and really quite look forward to my one day of sleeping in – Saturday morning.
Well this one Saturday about 6am or so – four or less hours after I crawl into bed – Rebecca (who was then only 4) and Sarah-Grace (who was 3 at the time) come bounding into our bedroom.
“Daddy, what’s a trout?” Rebecca, as a four year-old, asks me as she and her sister climb on my bed. “What’s a trout?”
(aside: You know what it is like when you try to respond to someone but you really don’t want to wake up – that is what it is like)
“What’s a trout?”
“A fish, why do you ask”
“A fish?”
“Yes a fish”
“Oh”
“Like Nemo…”
“Short of, I think Nemo is a Clown fish”
“Oh.”
“Daddy,” asks Sarah-Grace, who has been standing there the whole time, “what’s a trout?”
“A fish”
“Like Nemo”
“No”
“Daddy”
“Yes, Sarah-Grace”
“What’s a trout?”
“A chipmunk. A Chipmunk!” I snap back with all the composure of one who has not had enough sleep.
The girls run out of the room laughing, none the worse for wear. I put my pillow over my head and just try to get back to sleep wondering just what that was all about and why I was woken up for a question that no one seemed to want the answer to anyway.
At this point, in comes Susan. Slowly and today with the calm demeanour of the caring mother and wife. I know I have spoken a little harshly to my daughters, so I listen intently as she lifts the pillow from my head and gently asks me, “Michael, What’s a trout?”
Looking back at the story of Jesus calming the storm recorded in Mark 4:35-41, I imagine that it must have been about the same feeling for Jesus as he was awakened from his sleep. The disciples are waking up Jesus with a simple request for him but they (unlike my daughters) are panicked. The storm had come up. They wake Jesus and ask –verse 38 – “Teacher, don't you care if we drown?”
How could they ask that? Really. Not only because they should know he does care but also because this is later in the same day as he has healed a man with leprosy (Matthew 8:1-3), taught about the Kingdom of Heaven and even told and explained many parables directly to his disciples.[1] He has just finished also, as Matthew 8 tells us, healing the Centurion’s servant, healing Peter’s mother-in-law and healing many others.
Here’s the thing. The disciples believe he can save them – or they would not have asked –verse 38 - "Teacher, don't you care if we drown?" What they don’t know, however, is how or even if he wants to – as verse 41 makes clear in their astonishment in the fact that even the waves obey Him. The disciples don’t know how or even believe that Jesus will save them. They are panicked. Jesus notes, Verse 40, that the disciples don’t have faith[2]. They don’t have faith.
Today, do we have faith? Real faith? Not just a belief that Jesus can do things but a faith that Jesus will do what is best for us viz. a viz. His Kingdom. In our world today, we are faced with many storms as indeed other boats on that same see with the disciples that day faced that same storm: People nowadays face debt, families face deep personal divides and struggles, divorce, adultery, custody fights; we face all kinds of things.[3] Sometimes we face new experiences that aren’t unexpected. Sometimes we are totally surprised. We know that God can save us. Sometimes, isn’t it true though that we don’t have faith that He will save us? Sometimes we do seem to treat God as if he can’t; Jesus, as if he is sleeping and in need of a good waking up before he even bother to help us, if he can.
Sometimes do we feel like he doesn’t know that the storm we are in is really serious? Sometimes does it seem that He won’t care if we drown in our struggles? Sometimes, in our personal struggles, do we try to wake him with – like it says in verse 38, “don't you care if we drown?” Sometimes, do we in a panic, barge in on the Lord. -“God please do something quick. I’m going to be fired or my marriage is falling apart or my family hates me or I don’t have any money to pay the bills: Do something…if you care…if you can!
There was a time in my life when I was certainly tempted to try to wake the Lord in this way. I owned many businesses before I became an Officer in The Salvation Army. It was a lot of work and a lot of fun but in the early days, there were times that I really did not know if we would make it. Money was tight. Sometimes I didn’t know if we would be able to keep my promises to my staff and my customers. Sometimes I would send my salespeople out as more like bill collectors and if they didn’t come back with the funds we needed I would not speak kindly to them and then tell them to go home for the day. And then when I am alone, my fervent attempts to wake up God could begin… ‘Help, I’m drowning,” I would cry. Save me…if you care…if you can!
Now I should make it clear that neither I nor the text here is saying that we shouldn’t go to the Lord when we are in this trouble. It is saying that we should go to the Lord but that we should go to the Lord in faith believing that He actually can and will save us. Mark spends a lot of time talking about the interaction between God’s miracles and our faith. When we approach the Lord we must do so in faith. We must believe in and trust the Lord. In our requests and storms we must, like James 1:6-7 says, believe and not doubt, because he who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That [person] should not think he will receive anything from the Lord. We must go to the Lord with faith.[4]
Jesus did save the disciples from the storm, it says (Aside voice:) This is significant, as Williamson notes: "in the original text, Jesus speaks only two words at this point..."Be quiet! Be still. The simplicity and brevity of his command express the assurance of one who is in control."[5] Just as Jesus has always saved me from my crises (aside voice:) though not always the way that I think He will, He will always come through and always continue to save us.
A prime example of this sort of thing is the story of another person caught in a boat in a storm in the Bible – Jonah[6]. You remember the story of Jonah. Jonah has faith. Jonah knows what God wants him to do and Jonah knows that God will do what He says. The only problem is that Jonah doesn’t want Him to. You see, God told Jonah to preach to the people in Nivevah so that they will not be destroyed BUT Jonah wants them to be destroyed. Jonah doesn’t like the Ninivites: they are the paramount superpower of his day and they will eventually destroy his homeland. But in this, he has faith. When the storm comes up, He knows God will calm the storm. He has so much faith that he EVEN suggests that the crew, in this storm, throw him overboard and they do…and of course Jonah and everyone else survives. Jonah grumbled a lot precisely because he does have faith. He knew God would calm the storm. It is very likely that the author here, Mark, has this in mind when he is retelling the story of how Jesus calms the storm.[7]
The disciples, like Jonah, can and should have this same faith in God because, ultimately, somehow, whether we understand it or not, God’s will will be done. He can save us and He does want what’s best for us in His kingdom.
Here, the disciples do eventually realize that, praise the Lord. They are terrified (!) as verse 41 says. The Greek nuances of this word, ‘terrified’, actually refer to a “reverent awe.”[8] They are in awe of Him. They are in complete terrible awe of Jesus – and this is good.
Notice this: Jesus is right in the storm with the disciples. They are not alone. They know, from what that have seen already that He can save them and now as they see Him do it they are in a full “reverent awe.” They can have faith in Jesus as they face life’s storms. They don’t need to panic. They can be calm because Jesus has calmed the storm and because Jesus can calm any storm.
And Jesus can still calm any storm; so today we can still have faith as we face life’s storms. I know some of us here are going through some particularly serious family problems: Jesus is God. God is in control. And unlike when my kids wake me up with the same question over and over again, (slow down and emphasize:) God can always be patient and forgiving. WAVES MAGAZINE, one particularly stressful business I owned, always went to print. I never lost my house or office or anything except maybe my self-composure over it. My staff, in this business AND my other businesses always got their paycheques and more. The Lord provides even and especially where we cannot. We can have faith. And as with the disciples and just like with Jonah, where God saved him and the Ninivites, it is not always as we anticipate that He will but we can have faith.
We don’t need to panic: He has provided. He is providing. I have faith. I am in reverent awe (M.C.). We don’t need to panic; somehow, someway, our storms too will all be calmed. We can stand in awe and have faith in Jesus.
You know that you can have that peace, that reverent awe as well. When the waves of life’s storms are crashing over our bow, we don’t need to panic. When we approach the Lord, we can stand in awe of Him and have faith that he will save us.
I know that many of us in this room are going through some significant struggles with family and friends, marriage breakdowns and custody struggles. The storms at times seem overwhelming but Jesus can calm the storms. Any who are caught in the midst of the storms right now, I encourage you to come up to the mercy seat and pray in faith.
Amen.
---
[1]The parable of the Sower, the lamp under a bushel, and the parable of the growing seed (Mark 4:1-20, 21-25, 26-35) He explained all these in private to the twelve.
[2] (cf. 7:18; 8:17-18, 21, 32-33; 9:19 for other similar rebukes)
[3] CBC News. “1 in 5 Canadians don't plan to retire: StatsCan” n.p. [cited 05 06 06] On-line: http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/03/27/womenretirement060327.html employment opportunities change or diminish as indeed do people’s savings gambled away on the stock exchange
[4] Like is recorded in James 1:6-8: when [one] asks, he must believe and not doubt, because he who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That [person] should not think he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a double-minded man, unstable in all he does.”
[5] Lamar Williamson Jr., Mark. (Interpretation: Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1983), 101
[6] Jonah is a prophet in ancient Israel around 740 –750 BC during the time that Assyria is the area’s superpower. God tells Jonah to preach salvation to the people living in their capital city, Nineveh. Jonah does not want to do this. He knows that the Ninevites will repent and be saved. He doesn’t want him to – he doesn’t like the Ninivites, after all they are the paramount superpower of his day and committing all the violent acts that superpowers tend to commit in foreign lands - and shortly after their salvation, in 722, God will actually use them to destroy Israel, the northern kingdom. But Jonah has faith that the Ninevites will be saved - he never doubts - he just doesn’t want any part of it, so he boards a ship and runs away in the opposite direction.
[7] Robert A. Guelich, Mark 1-8:26. (WBC 34A: Dallas Texas: Word Books, 1989), 266
[8] Ibid.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Mark 16:1-8: Dead or Alive: what do you believe?
Presented to Nipawin and Tisdale Corps on March 23, 2008 (Resurrection Sunday), the Swift Current corps of The Salvation Army on April 08, 2012, and 614 Warehouse Mission in Toronto on April 01, 2018 by Captain Michael Ramsay
To view the 2012 version click here: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2012/04/mark-161-8-dead-or-alive-what-do-you.html
Christ has Risen (He has Risen Indeed).
So this is it. This is the most important day in the Christian calendar. This is the day we celebrate the risen Christ. This is exciting indeed. This is how Jesus defeated sin and death by dying and rising again on the third day. Today is the celebration. Today is exciting. Do you know what these are? (My daughters’ medals) They are medals, right? These are medals that my daughters were awarded this year in soccer and skating.[1]
Rebecca did a really good job her first year in skating. Sarah-Grace’s soccer team was in two tournaments this year. In the first one her team won bronze. In the second one her team won silver: they played really well and we were all so proud. You should have heard some of the dads cheering. It was a lot of fun; we celebrated. Everyone is looking forward to the next tournament when we can go for gold.
This is what Easter (Resurrection Day) is all about.[2] It is all about celebrating the victory of Jesus through the death and resurrection and more than that: it appears, in Mark Chapter 16, that they were celebrating an unexpected victory[3] – a come from behind win if you will. Look at 16:1, “When the Sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome brought spices so that they might go to anoint Jesus' body.”
Luke 23:56 tells us that they prepared these spices before the Sabbath[4] began but waited until after to anoint the body; so what is the purpose of anointing the body? Some have suggested that it has to do with an embalming practice of sorts but, of course, the Jewish people never practiced embalming;[5] however, it does still have to do with a burial rite of the first century Palestinians. The women went there to see a dead man. They don’t believe he’s alive.
Listen to their conversation en route too. On the way to the grave, on the way to the tomb what are they talking about? What’s on their minds? Are they discussing the possibility of the resurrection? Are they wondering if…maybe…could he have risen from the dead? No. The text doesn’t even accord them enough faith to doubt here. What it records that they are concerned with here is the rock in front of tomb. Who’ll roll it away they wonder? Right? Look at Verse 3; it says that the women asked each other, “Who’ll roll away the stone?” They think they are going to see a dead man sealed in a tomb. They don’t know he’s alive. They don’t believe.
Now this is somewhat disappointing, isn’t it? As we have been reading through Mark together these last few weeks in preparation for this celebration of the resurrection, Mark has revealed to his readers on a number of occasions that Jesus repeatedly told his followers that indeed he is going to be raised from the dead (8:31, 9:9, 9:31,10:34,15:29). And as it says in 9:10 and 31 that the disciples anyway heard exactly what he was teaching but they just did not understand and what they should have understood, they just did not believe.[6] After all, how can someone raise from the dead?
Now then the women are heading to the tomb like many of us head to either a graveside or a memorial service in our day and age. They head out to pay their last respects to a man – to a man that they had so much respect for, so much love for, so much hope for, for a man that they had faith in but now as they walk the road to the tomb, they do so, perfume in hand, worrying about the stone and who will move it from the grave. They do not believe that he has risen. They do not believe.
Do we ever get to a point where we do not believe any longer? Do we ever get to the point where we, by our actions, head out to bury Jesus? The world had told us through Time Magazine that ‘God is dead.’[7] John Lennon relieved himself on nuns[8] and the rock group Oasis still not too many years ago now, announced to the world, like Lennon before them, that they were even more popular than Jesus.
We have a system of government in this country where we assume that 50%+1 of the population says is correct at least 50%+1 of time and we are told that is good enough system to put our faith in and we, in this country, have an economic system that says that you deserve more liberties as you gain more money. Many assume that these are the only things that we can believe in: popular opinion and money. But if Christ has raised then this is not true…If Christ has raised from the dead then it is Jesus who we should believe in.
The world also tells us that we have to ‘look out for number one’ and make sure that we are happy before we can even give consideration to our neighbour. ‘We are the master of our own destiny’; ‘we have to first be true to ourselves’; and then ‘we can only rely on ourselves’: this thinking, this make believe, this trap, is based on the assumption, the lie that Jesus is not alive and God is not looking out for us. It is based on the fallacy that he is not involved in our world; these belief systems are based on the false assumption that Jesus Christ is dead. This trap that we have to rely on ourselves, this trap of trusting ourselves rather than God, this trap of disbelief in the power of the resurrected Christ, this trap is very dangerous.
Do we ever fall into this trap? Do we ever act as if we don’t believe he’s alive? How do we do here today at recognising that God, Jesus is actually alive and that it is he who we should be serving rather than ourselves? How do we make our daily decisions: do we base them on our finances and our own fleeting whims or do we base them on what God tells us? Do we ignore Him as if God is dead or do we serve a lord who is alive?
Do we make our decisions through praying and reading the Bible? When we are planning for retirement and have to move money here or there, do we pray about how or if we should invest? Do we look in the scriptures? What about for those of us in school? How do we decide what classes to take or what school to attend? Do we pray and fast? Do we believe that Jesus will help us? Do we act as though we believe he is alive or do we ignore him as if he were never raised from the dead?
What about us parents and grandparents? How do we decide to raise our children? Do we consult the Bible when making real every day decisions? Do we pray with our children when they have a serious issue on their mind? Do we help them in this way; do we believe in Jesus – or do we leave our family to their own devices and our decisions to our passing whims and fancies?
In our everyday real, tangible Monday to Friday and Saturday and Sunday lives, do we expect that Jesus is alive and he is there for us? Do we believe that he is real and that he wants and will give us what is best for us or do we, by relying on our own devices, act as though he is still dead and sealed in the tomb?
In our Sunday morning church gatherings, when we come here, are we expectantly seeking the risen Lord or are we doing nothing more than visiting the tomb to remember a dead Messiah, hoping that somehow through the service someone will roll away the stone so we can anoint his lifeless, powerless body with songs and sermons? Is Jesus dead or alive? Is he risen and active? Is he alive? What do we really believe?
I remember once when I was in my early to mid-twenties. I had a contract at Defence Research. It was an exciting, yet a stressful time. I had some very skilled people working with me and the work sometimes was very precise and there was a lot that my staff could do and this was good because I personally couldn’t be there every day (I had other contracts to tend to as well) but, even though they could be trusted, there were inevitably aspects of the job that they could and should not do. There were aspects of the job that took my personal attention.
Our contract at Defence Research involved the physical relocation of the lab from the west coast of Canada to the east coast. It was very important that everything that was packed up was to be documented properly. There were things that the scientists were working on that, trust me, you just didn’t want to get loose or mixed up in the trip across the country; so we set up a detailed procedure of inventorying everything and after each box was packed I had to personally clear it before it was put on the truck; so I told them never to load the truck when I wasn’t there. Repeatedly, I told them how important it was never to load the truck when I wasn’t there and it was posted on the doors of the warehouse that they must never load the truck when I wasn’t there.
Well one Thursday, when I wasn’t there, the truck arrives. Now some of my staff are quite eager workers still at this point and want to get everything done as soon as possible. They think that they know everything that needs to be done. I had told them not to load the truck when I wasn’t there - but…
I come into work the next day and the warehouse is empty[9] and there is the truck locked up, apparently ready to go and not a single inventory sheet was even sitting on my desk. I was so upset not only because that truck was not supposed to be loaded when I wasn’t there but also because they didn’t keep proper records so that whatever is in the truck and whatever is in every box in the truck now needs to be taken out and re-sorted and inventoried. I am upset. I start to raise my voice as I demand that Troy, the only one of my staff that I can find, I yell and demand that Troy that he open the truck and start taking everything out of there. He opens the truck.
Troy opens the truck: it is empty – except for the rest of my staff who are in there laughing at me because I fell for their rouse. They had played a joke on me; I fell for it.
I was upset because, even though the truck was supposed to be empty, even though we all knew it was supposed to be empty, and we were all told repeatedly that it was supposed to be empty, I didn’t think it would be. . I didn’t believe what I should have believed. I looked around the warehouse at the way things seemed and I didn’t believe that the truck would be empty like it was supposed to be.
This is the same as the empty tomb today in our story and indeed in our world today, isn’t it? The women are undoubtedly upset as they are going out to the tomb where – even though Jesus said he would rise again on the third day, even though Jesus said in effect that the tomb should be empty – the ladies are upset because they expect that the tomb, like I expected that the truck, they expect that the tomb will not be empty.
But, halleluiah, they’re wrong and instead of Jesus’ body in the tomb, and instead of my laughing friends in the back of the empty truck, there is a totally different messenger, who in Luke’s account (Lk 24:5) asks the question, “Why do you look for the living among the dead?” He has risen.
Now, of course, there is this beautiful irony that Mark ends off with in his story here. As recorded in verse 7, the angel says to the people, “… go, tell his disciples and Peter, ‘… you will see him, just as he told you.’” Here they are supposed to tell about this miracle. And in verse 8 it records that the women say nothing to anyone because they are afraid. Do you notice irony? In almost every story we’ve read in Mark so far the people are told not to tell anyone – and what do they do? Tell everyone. Here the people are instructed to tell people and what do they do? Tell no one. Go figure. (Good thing he had multiple post-resurrection appearances!) We all can now believe!
Today – on this Easter Sunday – on Resurrection Day, today, we have a choice to make. We have a very real choice to make. It is this: we can believe that the tomb is empty or not. This changes everything. We can believe that the tomb is empty or that it is not. Is Jesus dead or alive, what do we believe?
As Jesus is alive, if we realise that the tomb is empty and if we recognise that He is our Lord and Jesus is God then whatever difficulties we may have we can bring to him. He will work them out for His good and His Kingdom because He has conquered sin and death so there is no problem that we could have that is too big for him. But if we don’t recognise that Jesus is alive then we are forced to rely on just our own strength and our own passing fancy. So today let’s look in that empty tomb of history and notice that indeed this tomb is empty and today and from now on let’s not come here to eulogize and bury Jesus but to praise Him and serve our risen Lord. He’s alive.
Christ has Risen (He has Risen Indeed)
Let us pray…
----
[1] Actually, as Rebecca pointed out in the Nipawin service, I accidentally only grabbed two of Sarah-Grace’s medals.
[2] And, like the next tournament, He’s coming again…though we know not when!
[3] REVD M. Percy, Ripon College, Oxford – in ‘Seeing isn’t believing’ in EXT: Vol. 119, No. 5, p. 238-239 compares the event to looking at an ultrasound image. Sure some people can interpret them. Yes, we believe the doctors but can we make heads or tails of it? Some can but others cannot necessarily without help. (Still others I’m sure can choose not to believe the images are real at all. – MR)
[4] CF. RCH Lenski. The Interpretation of St. Mark’s Gospel. P. 737, for a different opinion: he believes that these indeed may be entirely different spices
[5] W. Wessel: Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Mark, The Resurrection (16:1-8), Book Version: 4.0.2 : it was a single act of love and devotion probably meant to reduce the stench of the decomposing body. Palestine's hot climate causes corpses to decay rapidly. Thus the action of the women seems strange. Perhaps they thought that the coolness of the tomb would prevent the decomposition process from taking place as rapidly as it otherwise would.
[6] They aren’t alone. NT Wright, The Bishop of Durham, http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Jesus_Resurrection.htm ‘Jesus’ Resurrection and Christian Origins’ (Originally published in Gregorianum, 2002, 83/4, 615–635) makes this observation about the pagan beliefs in the ancient world: “whenever the question of bodily resurrection is raised in the ancient world the answer is negative. Homer does not imagine that there is a way back; Plato does not suppose anyone in their right mind would want one. There may or may not be various forms of life after death, but the one thing there isn’t is resurrection: the word anastasis refers to something that everybody knows doesn’t happen. The classic statement is in Aeschylus’s play Eumenides (647-8), in which, during the founding of the Court of the Areopagus, Apollo himself declares that when a man has died, and his blood is spilt on the ground, there is no resurrection. The language of resurrection, or something like it, was used in Egypt in connection with the very full and developed view of the world beyond death. But this new life was something that had, it was believed, already begun, and it did not involve actual bodily return to the present world. Nor was everybody fooled by the idea that the dead were already enjoying a full life beyond the grave. When the eager Egyptians tried to show their new ruler Augustus their hoard of wonderful mummies, he replied that he wanted to see kings, not corpses”
[7] Time Magazine. Cover: ‘Is God Dead?’ Vol 97., No. 14: April 8, 1966. From the article, Toward a Hidden God: “Even within Christianity, now confidently renewing itself in spirit as well as form, a small band of radical theologians has seriously argued that the churches must accept the fact of God's death, and get along without him. How does the issue differ from the age-old assertion that God does not and never did exist? Nietzsche's thesis was that striving, self-centered man had killed God, and that settled that. The current death-of-God group* believes that God is indeed absolutely dead, but proposes to carry on and write a theology without theos, without God. Less radical Christian thinkers hold that at the very least God in the image of man, God sitting in heaven, is dead, and—in the central task of religion today—they seek to imagine and define a God who can touch men's emotions and engage men's minds.”
[8] On Good Friday 1962, no less, after hanging a sacrileges image from his balcony: http://www.kakool.com/content/john-lennon-good-friday
[9] They had moved the cargo to a different part of the warehouse and it turns out that none of it was any the worse for wear in the end.
To view the 2012 version click here: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2012/04/mark-161-8-dead-or-alive-what-do-you.html
Christ has Risen (He has Risen Indeed).
So this is it. This is the most important day in the Christian calendar. This is the day we celebrate the risen Christ. This is exciting indeed. This is how Jesus defeated sin and death by dying and rising again on the third day. Today is the celebration. Today is exciting. Do you know what these are? (My daughters’ medals) They are medals, right? These are medals that my daughters were awarded this year in soccer and skating.[1]
Rebecca did a really good job her first year in skating. Sarah-Grace’s soccer team was in two tournaments this year. In the first one her team won bronze. In the second one her team won silver: they played really well and we were all so proud. You should have heard some of the dads cheering. It was a lot of fun; we celebrated. Everyone is looking forward to the next tournament when we can go for gold.
This is what Easter (Resurrection Day) is all about.[2] It is all about celebrating the victory of Jesus through the death and resurrection and more than that: it appears, in Mark Chapter 16, that they were celebrating an unexpected victory[3] – a come from behind win if you will. Look at 16:1, “When the Sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome brought spices so that they might go to anoint Jesus' body.”
Luke 23:56 tells us that they prepared these spices before the Sabbath[4] began but waited until after to anoint the body; so what is the purpose of anointing the body? Some have suggested that it has to do with an embalming practice of sorts but, of course, the Jewish people never practiced embalming;[5] however, it does still have to do with a burial rite of the first century Palestinians. The women went there to see a dead man. They don’t believe he’s alive.
Listen to their conversation en route too. On the way to the grave, on the way to the tomb what are they talking about? What’s on their minds? Are they discussing the possibility of the resurrection? Are they wondering if…maybe…could he have risen from the dead? No. The text doesn’t even accord them enough faith to doubt here. What it records that they are concerned with here is the rock in front of tomb. Who’ll roll it away they wonder? Right? Look at Verse 3; it says that the women asked each other, “Who’ll roll away the stone?” They think they are going to see a dead man sealed in a tomb. They don’t know he’s alive. They don’t believe.
Now this is somewhat disappointing, isn’t it? As we have been reading through Mark together these last few weeks in preparation for this celebration of the resurrection, Mark has revealed to his readers on a number of occasions that Jesus repeatedly told his followers that indeed he is going to be raised from the dead (8:31, 9:9, 9:31,10:34,15:29). And as it says in 9:10 and 31 that the disciples anyway heard exactly what he was teaching but they just did not understand and what they should have understood, they just did not believe.[6] After all, how can someone raise from the dead?
Now then the women are heading to the tomb like many of us head to either a graveside or a memorial service in our day and age. They head out to pay their last respects to a man – to a man that they had so much respect for, so much love for, so much hope for, for a man that they had faith in but now as they walk the road to the tomb, they do so, perfume in hand, worrying about the stone and who will move it from the grave. They do not believe that he has risen. They do not believe.
Do we ever get to a point where we do not believe any longer? Do we ever get to the point where we, by our actions, head out to bury Jesus? The world had told us through Time Magazine that ‘God is dead.’[7] John Lennon relieved himself on nuns[8] and the rock group Oasis still not too many years ago now, announced to the world, like Lennon before them, that they were even more popular than Jesus.
We have a system of government in this country where we assume that 50%+1 of the population says is correct at least 50%+1 of time and we are told that is good enough system to put our faith in and we, in this country, have an economic system that says that you deserve more liberties as you gain more money. Many assume that these are the only things that we can believe in: popular opinion and money. But if Christ has raised then this is not true…If Christ has raised from the dead then it is Jesus who we should believe in.
The world also tells us that we have to ‘look out for number one’ and make sure that we are happy before we can even give consideration to our neighbour. ‘We are the master of our own destiny’; ‘we have to first be true to ourselves’; and then ‘we can only rely on ourselves’: this thinking, this make believe, this trap, is based on the assumption, the lie that Jesus is not alive and God is not looking out for us. It is based on the fallacy that he is not involved in our world; these belief systems are based on the false assumption that Jesus Christ is dead. This trap that we have to rely on ourselves, this trap of trusting ourselves rather than God, this trap of disbelief in the power of the resurrected Christ, this trap is very dangerous.
Do we ever fall into this trap? Do we ever act as if we don’t believe he’s alive? How do we do here today at recognising that God, Jesus is actually alive and that it is he who we should be serving rather than ourselves? How do we make our daily decisions: do we base them on our finances and our own fleeting whims or do we base them on what God tells us? Do we ignore Him as if God is dead or do we serve a lord who is alive?
Do we make our decisions through praying and reading the Bible? When we are planning for retirement and have to move money here or there, do we pray about how or if we should invest? Do we look in the scriptures? What about for those of us in school? How do we decide what classes to take or what school to attend? Do we pray and fast? Do we believe that Jesus will help us? Do we act as though we believe he is alive or do we ignore him as if he were never raised from the dead?
What about us parents and grandparents? How do we decide to raise our children? Do we consult the Bible when making real every day decisions? Do we pray with our children when they have a serious issue on their mind? Do we help them in this way; do we believe in Jesus – or do we leave our family to their own devices and our decisions to our passing whims and fancies?
In our everyday real, tangible Monday to Friday and Saturday and Sunday lives, do we expect that Jesus is alive and he is there for us? Do we believe that he is real and that he wants and will give us what is best for us or do we, by relying on our own devices, act as though he is still dead and sealed in the tomb?
In our Sunday morning church gatherings, when we come here, are we expectantly seeking the risen Lord or are we doing nothing more than visiting the tomb to remember a dead Messiah, hoping that somehow through the service someone will roll away the stone so we can anoint his lifeless, powerless body with songs and sermons? Is Jesus dead or alive? Is he risen and active? Is he alive? What do we really believe?
I remember once when I was in my early to mid-twenties. I had a contract at Defence Research. It was an exciting, yet a stressful time. I had some very skilled people working with me and the work sometimes was very precise and there was a lot that my staff could do and this was good because I personally couldn’t be there every day (I had other contracts to tend to as well) but, even though they could be trusted, there were inevitably aspects of the job that they could and should not do. There were aspects of the job that took my personal attention.
Our contract at Defence Research involved the physical relocation of the lab from the west coast of Canada to the east coast. It was very important that everything that was packed up was to be documented properly. There were things that the scientists were working on that, trust me, you just didn’t want to get loose or mixed up in the trip across the country; so we set up a detailed procedure of inventorying everything and after each box was packed I had to personally clear it before it was put on the truck; so I told them never to load the truck when I wasn’t there. Repeatedly, I told them how important it was never to load the truck when I wasn’t there and it was posted on the doors of the warehouse that they must never load the truck when I wasn’t there.
Well one Thursday, when I wasn’t there, the truck arrives. Now some of my staff are quite eager workers still at this point and want to get everything done as soon as possible. They think that they know everything that needs to be done. I had told them not to load the truck when I wasn’t there - but…
I come into work the next day and the warehouse is empty[9] and there is the truck locked up, apparently ready to go and not a single inventory sheet was even sitting on my desk. I was so upset not only because that truck was not supposed to be loaded when I wasn’t there but also because they didn’t keep proper records so that whatever is in the truck and whatever is in every box in the truck now needs to be taken out and re-sorted and inventoried. I am upset. I start to raise my voice as I demand that Troy, the only one of my staff that I can find, I yell and demand that Troy that he open the truck and start taking everything out of there. He opens the truck.
Troy opens the truck: it is empty – except for the rest of my staff who are in there laughing at me because I fell for their rouse. They had played a joke on me; I fell for it.
I was upset because, even though the truck was supposed to be empty, even though we all knew it was supposed to be empty, and we were all told repeatedly that it was supposed to be empty, I didn’t think it would be. . I didn’t believe what I should have believed. I looked around the warehouse at the way things seemed and I didn’t believe that the truck would be empty like it was supposed to be.
This is the same as the empty tomb today in our story and indeed in our world today, isn’t it? The women are undoubtedly upset as they are going out to the tomb where – even though Jesus said he would rise again on the third day, even though Jesus said in effect that the tomb should be empty – the ladies are upset because they expect that the tomb, like I expected that the truck, they expect that the tomb will not be empty.
But, halleluiah, they’re wrong and instead of Jesus’ body in the tomb, and instead of my laughing friends in the back of the empty truck, there is a totally different messenger, who in Luke’s account (Lk 24:5) asks the question, “Why do you look for the living among the dead?” He has risen.
Now, of course, there is this beautiful irony that Mark ends off with in his story here. As recorded in verse 7, the angel says to the people, “… go, tell his disciples and Peter, ‘… you will see him, just as he told you.’” Here they are supposed to tell about this miracle. And in verse 8 it records that the women say nothing to anyone because they are afraid. Do you notice irony? In almost every story we’ve read in Mark so far the people are told not to tell anyone – and what do they do? Tell everyone. Here the people are instructed to tell people and what do they do? Tell no one. Go figure. (Good thing he had multiple post-resurrection appearances!) We all can now believe!
Today – on this Easter Sunday – on Resurrection Day, today, we have a choice to make. We have a very real choice to make. It is this: we can believe that the tomb is empty or not. This changes everything. We can believe that the tomb is empty or that it is not. Is Jesus dead or alive, what do we believe?
As Jesus is alive, if we realise that the tomb is empty and if we recognise that He is our Lord and Jesus is God then whatever difficulties we may have we can bring to him. He will work them out for His good and His Kingdom because He has conquered sin and death so there is no problem that we could have that is too big for him. But if we don’t recognise that Jesus is alive then we are forced to rely on just our own strength and our own passing fancy. So today let’s look in that empty tomb of history and notice that indeed this tomb is empty and today and from now on let’s not come here to eulogize and bury Jesus but to praise Him and serve our risen Lord. He’s alive.
Christ has Risen (He has Risen Indeed)
Let us pray…
----
[1] Actually, as Rebecca pointed out in the Nipawin service, I accidentally only grabbed two of Sarah-Grace’s medals.
[2] And, like the next tournament, He’s coming again…though we know not when!
[3] REVD M. Percy, Ripon College, Oxford – in ‘Seeing isn’t believing’ in EXT: Vol. 119, No. 5, p. 238-239 compares the event to looking at an ultrasound image. Sure some people can interpret them. Yes, we believe the doctors but can we make heads or tails of it? Some can but others cannot necessarily without help. (Still others I’m sure can choose not to believe the images are real at all. – MR)
[4] CF. RCH Lenski. The Interpretation of St. Mark’s Gospel. P. 737, for a different opinion: he believes that these indeed may be entirely different spices
[5] W. Wessel: Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Mark, The Resurrection (16:1-8), Book Version: 4.0.2 : it was a single act of love and devotion probably meant to reduce the stench of the decomposing body. Palestine's hot climate causes corpses to decay rapidly. Thus the action of the women seems strange. Perhaps they thought that the coolness of the tomb would prevent the decomposition process from taking place as rapidly as it otherwise would.
[6] They aren’t alone. NT Wright, The Bishop of Durham, http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Jesus_Resurrection.htm ‘Jesus’ Resurrection and Christian Origins’ (Originally published in Gregorianum, 2002, 83/4, 615–635) makes this observation about the pagan beliefs in the ancient world: “whenever the question of bodily resurrection is raised in the ancient world the answer is negative. Homer does not imagine that there is a way back; Plato does not suppose anyone in their right mind would want one. There may or may not be various forms of life after death, but the one thing there isn’t is resurrection: the word anastasis refers to something that everybody knows doesn’t happen. The classic statement is in Aeschylus’s play Eumenides (647-8), in which, during the founding of the Court of the Areopagus, Apollo himself declares that when a man has died, and his blood is spilt on the ground, there is no resurrection. The language of resurrection, or something like it, was used in Egypt in connection with the very full and developed view of the world beyond death. But this new life was something that had, it was believed, already begun, and it did not involve actual bodily return to the present world. Nor was everybody fooled by the idea that the dead were already enjoying a full life beyond the grave. When the eager Egyptians tried to show their new ruler Augustus their hoard of wonderful mummies, he replied that he wanted to see kings, not corpses”
[7] Time Magazine. Cover: ‘Is God Dead?’ Vol 97., No. 14: April 8, 1966. From the article, Toward a Hidden God: “Even within Christianity, now confidently renewing itself in spirit as well as form, a small band of radical theologians has seriously argued that the churches must accept the fact of God's death, and get along without him. How does the issue differ from the age-old assertion that God does not and never did exist? Nietzsche's thesis was that striving, self-centered man had killed God, and that settled that. The current death-of-God group* believes that God is indeed absolutely dead, but proposes to carry on and write a theology without theos, without God. Less radical Christian thinkers hold that at the very least God in the image of man, God sitting in heaven, is dead, and—in the central task of religion today—they seek to imagine and define a God who can touch men's emotions and engage men's minds.”
[8] On Good Friday 1962, no less, after hanging a sacrileges image from his balcony: http://www.kakool.com/content/john-lennon-good-friday
[9] They had moved the cargo to a different part of the warehouse and it turns out that none of it was any the worse for wear in the end.
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Mark 8:31-33: Do you have in mind the things of God or the things of man?
Presented to Nipawin and Tisdale Corps on March 09, 2008
By Captain Michael Ramsay
In the last little while I have performed a few funerals / memorial services both here and in Tisdale. They are all a little bit different, of course. Some have been with the physical remains interred in an urn, others in a coffin and I was a part of one ceremony where the remains of the person were not even present at all. Most people have songs. Many have eulogies. Some people have pictures and I often preach a short homily based on the Holy Scriptures.
Of the ceremonies that I have been a part of in the North East here, none of the passings have really been a surprise and for most of them – even from just a humanistic viewpoint – were a blessing: loved ones don’t need to suffer anymore.
Of course from a Christian viewpoint there is another good part of the memorial or funeral ceremony, the acknowledgement that those that love the Lord will be raised again at the last trumpet and will be a part of the Lord’s kingdom either in Heaven or on the renewed earth.
Even recognizing all of that, you know what, in those last hours, before the dying pass on, when we know the end of their time with us is near and soon they will see the Lord face-to-face – in those last hours – at times we still don’t want to let them go, do we? And because we love them, we fight to keep them here even praying and begging God that they not to leave us.
I think this is some of what Mark is telling us about the Apostle Peter in the Chapter 8. Peter has just had an intimate moment (v.29) with the Lord where he confesses his messiahship and then Jesus tells Peter (v. 31) that he is going to die.
Peter and the Lord are close. Peter is part of his inner circle and he has just proposed to Jesus, verse 29, that he is the Messiah. Jesus acknowledges this truth to Peter, tells him to keep it a secret for a while and then proceeds to explain to Peter and all the disciples there what it is that must actually happen to the Messiah, “The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and that he must be killed …(sic)”
Peter, then as he has just figured out that Jesus is this ‘Son of Man’, this Messiah, Peter is now hearing Jesus is telling the disciples - that this Messiah must die.
Jesus must die. This is hard on Peter. He loves the Lord. Peter will have none of that talk. He has just acknowledged Jesus as Christ; so, Peter pulls him aside, so as not to ruin the secret that he actually is the Messiah, I’d guess. Peter pulls him aside and starts to rebuke him. The text doesn’t say specifically but he might be saying something here like, ‘Now Jesus, don’t talk like that… we won’t let them kill you…we’ll stand by you and protect you… we’ll be here for you… I’ll never leave you; don’t die on us… don’t leave us…”
This response is very much like many people when they find out that one they love is going to die. Peter has just been told that one he loves is going to die and he can’t accept that. Having just found that out he hasn’t come to terms with it yet. He will miss Jesus and he is focusing on that. This is human enough and it is the first of the stage grief cycle, denial.[1]
Jesus’ response to this reaction of Peter’s is far from comforting here; it is somewhat reminiscent of the way he addresses the Pharisees actually so far in this gospel. Notice this – Peter pulled Jesus aside to speak to him privately when he hears that Jesus is going to die but Jesus responds loud enough for all of the twelve to hear. Turning and looking at his disciples, verse 33, Jesus says to Peter, “Get behind me Satan! … You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.”
Jesus doesn’t stop there; he goes on: after he has called Peter ‘Satan’ in front of the disciples, Jesus calls to the crowds, verse 34, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's glory with the holy angels.”
Peter pulled Jesus aside to talk to him and Jesus responds on the spot by calling him “Satan” in front of Peter’s colleagues and then by making a point to the crowds following them. Peter’s actions here are not acceptable to Jesus. What he says is not just some trivial error that Jesus wants to keep quiet. It is rather an issue so serious that Jesus publicly addresses Peter’s comments with the harsh words that he does choose, but why?
What did Peter do that was so bad here that he merited being called ‘Satan’, dressed down in front of his friends, and becoming a catalyst for such a strong speech that is to follow? What did Peter do?
He - verse 33 records - he set his mind on himself, on human things rather than on the things of God. He put himself before Jesus and Jesus’ mission. In effect Peter here is trading in his treasures in heaven for earthy desires - and as Jesus says (verse 37), by setting his mind on the secular rather than the sacred, Peter is indeed choosing his personal desire to have Jesus avoid an early death over his very own soul.
Peter started thinking about what he wanted instead of what Jesus must do.[2] Peter starts thinking about what he wants rather than what God desires. It is this that earned him the epitaph ‘Satan’
That is not all it is though. The severe way in which Peter disagreed with Jesus is significant as well. Apparently the language Peter uses here to speak with the Lord is quite strong.[3] It says that he ‘rebuked’ (epitimoa) Jesus. That is the same language that the Jesus used to silence people (3:12), to control the storm (4:39), and to control and cast out demons (1:25) thus far in Mark’s gospel. This word epitimoa (rebuked) can mean ‘ordered’ or ‘silenced’[4] and it implies here an attempt to take control of Jesus such as that of his flesh and blood family back in Chapter 3 (verse 21) when they referred to Jesus as being ‘out of his mind’[5] and so tried to ‘take charge of him.’
Peter, like Jesus’ mother and brothers before him, Peter it appears is trying to take control of Jesus, trying to impose his will on Jesus. In Peter’s eyes it maybe for Jesus’ own good but when Jesus’ mother and brothers earlier attempted to do the same, Jesus denied them and now that Peter is doing this, Jesus calls him ‘Satan’. (Some theorists even point us back to Satan’s attempts to tempt Jesus in the wilderness here (Matt 4:10).[6]
This is serious. Peter, like Satan in the desert (Luke 4, Matt 4, Mark 1:13); Peter, like Jesus’ biological family (Mark 3), Peter is apparently wanting Jesus to do Peter’s bidding here. Rather than Peter doing what Jesus wants, Peter suggests that Jesus should do what he wants. Peter is, as it says in verse 33, setting his mind not on the things of God but on the things of man and this is fatal…
Are we ever tempted to do this? Are we ever tempted to take control of God? Are we ever tempted to - instead of asking Jesus what we should do for Him in a situation – are we ever tempted to tell Jesus what he should do for us?
Do these prayers ring any bells: Lord, help me win the lottery. God, please let me get this job whether or not I am qualified for it. Please let the Roughriders (or BC Lions) win the cup. Come on, please let me roll a seven. A six of hearts…please, just a six of hearts…
Are there times when – instead of asking and serving God - we ask God to serve us? I personally have heard people imply or outright say that if they are praying in this manner or that or if they are praying for such and such a thing that God is bound, He is obligated to answer those prayers according to the THEIR will.
I have heard this language around faith healing sometimes[7] where people will command God or His Spirit to heal someone and when that language is used in that way it really is an apparent attempt to control God/Jesus and this language always sends a chill up my spine…I wonder, in such cases, do we really have in mind the things of God or do we have in mind -the opposite- the things of men?
Now we need a little clarification: I am not implying that we should never ask the Lord for anything on our minds. No. Mark’s gospel story here is full of people asking Jesus for miracles that indeed Jesus does perform, in many cases according to their faith but Mark’s gospel also has people’s demand for a sign (Mark 8:11) from heaven flatly denied. Jesus is God.
Because Jesus is God, he is not simply easily swayed by our whims and fancies; Heaven is not a democracy where if we have a simple majority of prayers we can overthrow the will of God. Heaven, Praise the Lord, is a kingdom, a monarchy run by an absolute monarch.
This absolute monarch is a loving king. He is a father who wants the best for us and this, I think, is a big reason why he does not always give us what we want – sometimes the things we want, like Peter in our story here, sometimes the things we want when we set our minds on the things of people, are not what is best for us and neither are they what is best for the Kingdom.
Our fleshly desires are sometimes like a little child whose requests is like reaching for a pot of boiling water on the stovetop. God, the loving father, will swipe away her hand – however much that swat might hurt - before she turns the scalding water on herself.
Sometimes our desires are like the child reaching for the pot. Peter in his rebuke of the Lord was certainly like that child. He was reaching for the pot to look into it and see what it would be like if Jesus never did die. Had Peter’s desire not to lose Jesus, had Peter’s attempt to keep him from his death and resurrection prevailed, it would have been like dousing us all in that boiling water. If Jesus never did die and rise again, if sin and death were not defeated, if we could not experience that victory in Jesus, where would we be? In very hot water indeed. Jesus knows better than we do what is best for us.
It is better for us to have in mind the things of God than the things of man. God is a loving God. God did not submit to Peter’s will. Jesus instead swats Peter’s hand away from that pot of boiling selfishness and, sparing him, scalds him instead with a tongue-lashing, “Get behind me Satan! [He says]… You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.” Sure that may sting, but it stings a lot less than the eternal pain we’d suffer had Jesus succumb to temptation and his task not been accomplished.
God is a loving father. It says, (Luke 11:11-13) "Which of you fathers, if your son asks for a fish, will give him a snake instead? Or if he asks for an egg, will give him a scorpion? If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” He wants what’s best for us. We need to put our faith in him. We have to avoid trying to control God by telling him what to do for us and instead seek his will for our lives. We have to set our minds on the things of God rather than on our own desires.
God will look out for us. It is like my own daughters. I love them so – as much as they may or may not like it at times - I make them tidy up after themselves, so that they won’t have to struggle with the curse of disorganization for the rest of their lives. We teach them to read so that they need not fight illiteracy for eternity. We teach them to pray and read the living Word of God so that they can live forever and prosper, as the Lord permits, in the Kingdom of Heaven.
Now these choices to submit to the Lord won’t always be as easy or as clear-cut as the ones we have mentioned here. Verses 34 and 35 of Mark 8 say that we must take up our cross and follow Jesus. A parallel in our world today is to say that we must don our orange jumpsuits and walk down death row, listening to the calls of ‘dead man walking.’ We must seek God’s will not ours – with even our very life on the line.
We have to seek in Jesus’ will; not our own. We have to believe that we will be raised up on the last day with Jesus. We have to seek and be willing to lose our lives for Jesus if we want to gain eternal life. We have to seek Jesus’ will. We have to believe that what he wants for us is better than what we may want for ourselves. We have to have in mind the things of God and NOT the desires of our flesh.
As we finish here today, I am reminded of a comic by Bill Waterson: Calvin and Hobbes.[8] Calvin, in his request, thinks he knows what is best for himself. His loving parent however knows different….
So today we have a choice. We can be like Calvin in our prayers and in our lives and demand that our Heavenly Father give us everything we desire without regard for His will, in which case we will be - Praise the Lord - one disappointed little kid or we can approach the Lord and ask him what is his will and pray for that to be done on earth as it is in heaven.
Today, we have a choice, we can chose either the things of God or we can choose the things of man: which we choose?
Let us pray as Jesus taught us to pray…
Our Father who art in Heaven; hallowed be Thy name
Thy kingdom come; Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven
Give us this day our daily bread and
Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us
For thine is the power and the glory for ever and ever. Amen
----
[1] The five stages of coping with dying, abbreviated DABDA, were described by Kübler-Ross in her classic book On Death and Dying in 1969 They are D.A.B.D.A. – Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance.
[2] If he’d gotten what he wanted, we know that it would not be better for him –or for us – as death and sin would have never been defeated and we would be back to square one.
[3] Tolbert, Sowing, 202.
[4] Williamson, Jr. Lamar, Interpretation, 153.
[5] Pheme Perkins, NIB, 626.
[6] Palmer, 624; Lenski, 345; Williamson, 153.
[7] I still believe in faith healing provided that one is following God’s lead instead of the other way around.
[8] Bill Waterson, Calvin and Hobbes. United Press Syndication, 1988.
By Captain Michael Ramsay
In the last little while I have performed a few funerals / memorial services both here and in Tisdale. They are all a little bit different, of course. Some have been with the physical remains interred in an urn, others in a coffin and I was a part of one ceremony where the remains of the person were not even present at all. Most people have songs. Many have eulogies. Some people have pictures and I often preach a short homily based on the Holy Scriptures.
Of the ceremonies that I have been a part of in the North East here, none of the passings have really been a surprise and for most of them – even from just a humanistic viewpoint – were a blessing: loved ones don’t need to suffer anymore.
Of course from a Christian viewpoint there is another good part of the memorial or funeral ceremony, the acknowledgement that those that love the Lord will be raised again at the last trumpet and will be a part of the Lord’s kingdom either in Heaven or on the renewed earth.
Even recognizing all of that, you know what, in those last hours, before the dying pass on, when we know the end of their time with us is near and soon they will see the Lord face-to-face – in those last hours – at times we still don’t want to let them go, do we? And because we love them, we fight to keep them here even praying and begging God that they not to leave us.
I think this is some of what Mark is telling us about the Apostle Peter in the Chapter 8. Peter has just had an intimate moment (v.29) with the Lord where he confesses his messiahship and then Jesus tells Peter (v. 31) that he is going to die.
Peter and the Lord are close. Peter is part of his inner circle and he has just proposed to Jesus, verse 29, that he is the Messiah. Jesus acknowledges this truth to Peter, tells him to keep it a secret for a while and then proceeds to explain to Peter and all the disciples there what it is that must actually happen to the Messiah, “The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and that he must be killed …(sic)”
Peter, then as he has just figured out that Jesus is this ‘Son of Man’, this Messiah, Peter is now hearing Jesus is telling the disciples - that this Messiah must die.
Jesus must die. This is hard on Peter. He loves the Lord. Peter will have none of that talk. He has just acknowledged Jesus as Christ; so, Peter pulls him aside, so as not to ruin the secret that he actually is the Messiah, I’d guess. Peter pulls him aside and starts to rebuke him. The text doesn’t say specifically but he might be saying something here like, ‘Now Jesus, don’t talk like that… we won’t let them kill you…we’ll stand by you and protect you… we’ll be here for you… I’ll never leave you; don’t die on us… don’t leave us…”
This response is very much like many people when they find out that one they love is going to die. Peter has just been told that one he loves is going to die and he can’t accept that. Having just found that out he hasn’t come to terms with it yet. He will miss Jesus and he is focusing on that. This is human enough and it is the first of the stage grief cycle, denial.[1]
Jesus’ response to this reaction of Peter’s is far from comforting here; it is somewhat reminiscent of the way he addresses the Pharisees actually so far in this gospel. Notice this – Peter pulled Jesus aside to speak to him privately when he hears that Jesus is going to die but Jesus responds loud enough for all of the twelve to hear. Turning and looking at his disciples, verse 33, Jesus says to Peter, “Get behind me Satan! … You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.”
Jesus doesn’t stop there; he goes on: after he has called Peter ‘Satan’ in front of the disciples, Jesus calls to the crowds, verse 34, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's glory with the holy angels.”
Peter pulled Jesus aside to talk to him and Jesus responds on the spot by calling him “Satan” in front of Peter’s colleagues and then by making a point to the crowds following them. Peter’s actions here are not acceptable to Jesus. What he says is not just some trivial error that Jesus wants to keep quiet. It is rather an issue so serious that Jesus publicly addresses Peter’s comments with the harsh words that he does choose, but why?
What did Peter do that was so bad here that he merited being called ‘Satan’, dressed down in front of his friends, and becoming a catalyst for such a strong speech that is to follow? What did Peter do?
He - verse 33 records - he set his mind on himself, on human things rather than on the things of God. He put himself before Jesus and Jesus’ mission. In effect Peter here is trading in his treasures in heaven for earthy desires - and as Jesus says (verse 37), by setting his mind on the secular rather than the sacred, Peter is indeed choosing his personal desire to have Jesus avoid an early death over his very own soul.
Peter started thinking about what he wanted instead of what Jesus must do.[2] Peter starts thinking about what he wants rather than what God desires. It is this that earned him the epitaph ‘Satan’
That is not all it is though. The severe way in which Peter disagreed with Jesus is significant as well. Apparently the language Peter uses here to speak with the Lord is quite strong.[3] It says that he ‘rebuked’ (epitimoa) Jesus. That is the same language that the Jesus used to silence people (3:12), to control the storm (4:39), and to control and cast out demons (1:25) thus far in Mark’s gospel. This word epitimoa (rebuked) can mean ‘ordered’ or ‘silenced’[4] and it implies here an attempt to take control of Jesus such as that of his flesh and blood family back in Chapter 3 (verse 21) when they referred to Jesus as being ‘out of his mind’[5] and so tried to ‘take charge of him.’
Peter, like Jesus’ mother and brothers before him, Peter it appears is trying to take control of Jesus, trying to impose his will on Jesus. In Peter’s eyes it maybe for Jesus’ own good but when Jesus’ mother and brothers earlier attempted to do the same, Jesus denied them and now that Peter is doing this, Jesus calls him ‘Satan’. (Some theorists even point us back to Satan’s attempts to tempt Jesus in the wilderness here (Matt 4:10).[6]
This is serious. Peter, like Satan in the desert (Luke 4, Matt 4, Mark 1:13); Peter, like Jesus’ biological family (Mark 3), Peter is apparently wanting Jesus to do Peter’s bidding here. Rather than Peter doing what Jesus wants, Peter suggests that Jesus should do what he wants. Peter is, as it says in verse 33, setting his mind not on the things of God but on the things of man and this is fatal…
Are we ever tempted to do this? Are we ever tempted to take control of God? Are we ever tempted to - instead of asking Jesus what we should do for Him in a situation – are we ever tempted to tell Jesus what he should do for us?
Do these prayers ring any bells: Lord, help me win the lottery. God, please let me get this job whether or not I am qualified for it. Please let the Roughriders (or BC Lions) win the cup. Come on, please let me roll a seven. A six of hearts…please, just a six of hearts…
Are there times when – instead of asking and serving God - we ask God to serve us? I personally have heard people imply or outright say that if they are praying in this manner or that or if they are praying for such and such a thing that God is bound, He is obligated to answer those prayers according to the THEIR will.
I have heard this language around faith healing sometimes[7] where people will command God or His Spirit to heal someone and when that language is used in that way it really is an apparent attempt to control God/Jesus and this language always sends a chill up my spine…I wonder, in such cases, do we really have in mind the things of God or do we have in mind -the opposite- the things of men?
Now we need a little clarification: I am not implying that we should never ask the Lord for anything on our minds. No. Mark’s gospel story here is full of people asking Jesus for miracles that indeed Jesus does perform, in many cases according to their faith but Mark’s gospel also has people’s demand for a sign (Mark 8:11) from heaven flatly denied. Jesus is God.
Because Jesus is God, he is not simply easily swayed by our whims and fancies; Heaven is not a democracy where if we have a simple majority of prayers we can overthrow the will of God. Heaven, Praise the Lord, is a kingdom, a monarchy run by an absolute monarch.
This absolute monarch is a loving king. He is a father who wants the best for us and this, I think, is a big reason why he does not always give us what we want – sometimes the things we want, like Peter in our story here, sometimes the things we want when we set our minds on the things of people, are not what is best for us and neither are they what is best for the Kingdom.
Our fleshly desires are sometimes like a little child whose requests is like reaching for a pot of boiling water on the stovetop. God, the loving father, will swipe away her hand – however much that swat might hurt - before she turns the scalding water on herself.
Sometimes our desires are like the child reaching for the pot. Peter in his rebuke of the Lord was certainly like that child. He was reaching for the pot to look into it and see what it would be like if Jesus never did die. Had Peter’s desire not to lose Jesus, had Peter’s attempt to keep him from his death and resurrection prevailed, it would have been like dousing us all in that boiling water. If Jesus never did die and rise again, if sin and death were not defeated, if we could not experience that victory in Jesus, where would we be? In very hot water indeed. Jesus knows better than we do what is best for us.
It is better for us to have in mind the things of God than the things of man. God is a loving God. God did not submit to Peter’s will. Jesus instead swats Peter’s hand away from that pot of boiling selfishness and, sparing him, scalds him instead with a tongue-lashing, “Get behind me Satan! [He says]… You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.” Sure that may sting, but it stings a lot less than the eternal pain we’d suffer had Jesus succumb to temptation and his task not been accomplished.
God is a loving father. It says, (Luke 11:11-13) "Which of you fathers, if your son asks for a fish, will give him a snake instead? Or if he asks for an egg, will give him a scorpion? If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” He wants what’s best for us. We need to put our faith in him. We have to avoid trying to control God by telling him what to do for us and instead seek his will for our lives. We have to set our minds on the things of God rather than on our own desires.
God will look out for us. It is like my own daughters. I love them so – as much as they may or may not like it at times - I make them tidy up after themselves, so that they won’t have to struggle with the curse of disorganization for the rest of their lives. We teach them to read so that they need not fight illiteracy for eternity. We teach them to pray and read the living Word of God so that they can live forever and prosper, as the Lord permits, in the Kingdom of Heaven.
Now these choices to submit to the Lord won’t always be as easy or as clear-cut as the ones we have mentioned here. Verses 34 and 35 of Mark 8 say that we must take up our cross and follow Jesus. A parallel in our world today is to say that we must don our orange jumpsuits and walk down death row, listening to the calls of ‘dead man walking.’ We must seek God’s will not ours – with even our very life on the line.
We have to seek in Jesus’ will; not our own. We have to believe that we will be raised up on the last day with Jesus. We have to seek and be willing to lose our lives for Jesus if we want to gain eternal life. We have to seek Jesus’ will. We have to believe that what he wants for us is better than what we may want for ourselves. We have to have in mind the things of God and NOT the desires of our flesh.
As we finish here today, I am reminded of a comic by Bill Waterson: Calvin and Hobbes.[8] Calvin, in his request, thinks he knows what is best for himself. His loving parent however knows different….
So today we have a choice. We can be like Calvin in our prayers and in our lives and demand that our Heavenly Father give us everything we desire without regard for His will, in which case we will be - Praise the Lord - one disappointed little kid or we can approach the Lord and ask him what is his will and pray for that to be done on earth as it is in heaven.
Today, we have a choice, we can chose either the things of God or we can choose the things of man: which we choose?
Let us pray as Jesus taught us to pray…
Our Father who art in Heaven; hallowed be Thy name
Thy kingdom come; Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven
Give us this day our daily bread and
Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us
For thine is the power and the glory for ever and ever. Amen
----
[1] The five stages of coping with dying, abbreviated DABDA, were described by Kübler-Ross in her classic book On Death and Dying in 1969 They are D.A.B.D.A. – Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance.
[2] If he’d gotten what he wanted, we know that it would not be better for him –or for us – as death and sin would have never been defeated and we would be back to square one.
[3] Tolbert, Sowing, 202.
[4] Williamson, Jr. Lamar, Interpretation, 153.
[5] Pheme Perkins, NIB, 626.
[6] Palmer, 624; Lenski, 345; Williamson, 153.
[7] I still believe in faith healing provided that one is following God’s lead instead of the other way around.
[8] Bill Waterson, Calvin and Hobbes. United Press Syndication, 1988.
Monday, March 3, 2008
Mark 7:1-23: Inside and Outside
Presented to Nipawin Corps on March 03, 2008
By Captain Michael Ramsay
We met John in the introductory story the other week. John is now married to Janet and they live somewhere up here in the North where he recently learned some lessons about shovelling snow. Now John didn’t always live here. He actually grew up in a big city down south many years ago. His graduating class though was only about the same size as Tisdale – not Tisdale’s grad class – all of Tisdale. Life was a little bit different.
Now John used to be a Mars Bar fan. Actually, he can still be led astray by a Mars Bar at times but once upon a time when he was in junior high, it got him into quite a bit of trouble.
But in John’s school of 3000 people there were two popular groups of kids: the INSIDE people and the OUTSIDE people. Now the INSIDE people were the one’s who had all the money. They wore the fashionable clothes, they were the one’s that as each of them turned 16, their parents were planning to buy them new cars. Their parents had all the fancy jobs and they knew they were special.
The outside people, on the other hand, didn’t necessarily have all that same stuff and so they hung out outside in jeans and a T-shirt all year long outside for two reasons – one because well, he didn’t live in Northern Saskatchewan so they could be outside in a just t-shirt all year long and 2) they were smokers and jr. high students -even back then- weren’t allowed to smoke in the schools.
John was neither in with the inside people nor out with the outside people but neither was he in with the outsiders nor out with the insiders; John was quite happy just hanging out in his own little world with a couple of friends until one day, something happened…
John’s social studies class was studying law and as a final project; everyone was going to get dressed up as different characters and have a mock trial. All the kids signed up for what they wanted – prosecution, defence, witnesses, accused, and the leftovers were on the jury. John was on the jury.
Now there was this fellow, Bill. Bill knew John but Bill was a very popular person –too popular for John - Bill was the defence attorney, Bill wanted to win this case and Bill was one of the inside people.
So at lunch hour there was John walking through the inside of the school - thinking about nothing more than, well, Mars Bars – when Bill, the inside person, approaches – “Hello John; how are you John; do you want a Mars Bar John?”
“Why yes I do,” says John thinking how lucky he is to have a Mars Bar offered to him right when he was wanting a Mars Bar…and he begins to eat it…
“Now all you have to do is to get the jury to vote for acquittal on the trial this afternoon,” says Bill, the INSIDE person, as John, thinking of nothing more than his Mars bar, agrees and heads OUTSIDE to go home for lunch and when he is OUTSIDE, he sees Silvia…
Silvia smiles at John. Silvia is a beautiful girl. Silvia is a popular girl. Silvia is an OUTSIDE girl. Silvia has never smiled at John before and Silvia – Silvia is prosecution in today’s trail and Silvia smiles at John.
John is quite surprised by all this attention so he quickly finishes his Mars bar, puts the wrapper in his pocket, scrapes he teeth clean and smiles back in an awkward, Jr. High school kind of way.
“John, what are you doing today … after school?” Silvia asks.
“Going home to watch TV, have a snack…”
“No,” says Silvia who is smiling in a teasing sort of way. “No” says Silvia “John, what are you doing today after school…with me…right after you convict the accused in law class?” She winks, turns, and walks away with the OUTSIDE people.
Oh…wow. Now, this is starting to sound like a date – John had never had a date before. He really didn’t know what to do, he just knew that this was turning out to be a great day; not only has he got his first ever date, but he also got a Mars Bar and …, oh wait.
Well, what to do now? John has a moral decision to make…should he support the OUTSIDE PERSON Silvia, or the INSIDE PERSON Bill who has already paid his bribe…then – for a fleeting moment - he wonders all together whether jurors should take bribes at all and then he has an idea; he runs home as fast as he can. He doesn’t stop to have lunch; he just grabs his change from his dresser. Just enough. He will buy Bill a Mars Bar, pay him back, and tell him that he can’t be bribed and then he’ll have a date with Silvia.
After he buys the Mars Bar on the way back to school, he becomes so pleased with his idea that he starts thinking about what he and Silvia could do on their date. They could go out to this coffee shop that sells deep fried Mars Bars and then it could become their place and they could go there everyday and have deep fried Mars Bars and John is really getting excited now about the prospect of this. He and Silvia could go and have a Mars Bar everyday together and then he thought that he could go for a Mars Bar right now and then, looking down, in all his excitement, he noticed that indeed he is having a Mars Bar right now…Bill’s Mars bar…uh oh.
Ding time for class.
John goes to class and he sees Bill, and the INSIDE people, and he musters as much courage as he can and he tells him that he can’t be bribed… and then he runs to hide in the jury box…
The trial goes well and the jury is sent to deliberate. John is sitting with the other jurors still dreaming of his life of Mars Bar dates with the OUTSIDE PERSON Silvia when all of a sudden he notices – the other Jurors – and one of them is a girl he’s never met before, an INSIDER PERSON named Janet, who says, “so its decided then, he’s innocent.”
“Guilty” says John, who is wondering how this could have gone so terribly wrong. “Innocent” says Janet, “Guilty” says John and Janet pulls out a Mars Bar…the accused gets off. John, never does get a date with Silvia, but he did get 3 Mars bars that day so he figures that it wasn’t all bad a day after all…
If you’ll turn with me to the Gospel of Mark, Chapter 7, you’ll notice that Jesus shares with us a little parable about the INSIDE and OUTSIDE of a cup as he speaks about moral dilemma not too far divorced from high school bribery of today’s story.
So here’s the situation: the Pharisees, who we’ve looked at before, they really do want to keep the law and all the traditions. They want everything to be perfect. They are sort of like an albeit misguided type of hyper-holiness movement of their day. It says in verses 3 and 4 that not only do they observe the washing of dishes, food, and hands, but they really do try to keep all the traditions.[1]
Jesus says that the Pharisees of our account here are missing the point. He quotes Isaiah, in Verses 6 and 7 and saying, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites;[2] as it is written: ‘These people honour me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men.’”[3]
He goes on, Verse 8: “You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human traditions.” These are harsh comments. Jesus isn’t really being gentle, meek and mild in this passage is he? He’s shooting from the hip – so to speak – and this is something he tends to do with the religious people, the synagogue-going people, the church people, isn’t it?
We’ve studied about how he extends so much charity to the outsiders but to those who should know better, he tells it like it is, doesn’t he? Jesus continues, verses 9-13, “And he said to them: ‘You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions! For Moses said, ‘Honour your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.’ But you say that if a man says to his father or mother: ‘Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is Corban’ (that is, a gift devoted to God), then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.’”[4]
Jesus says that by their very traditions they are transgressing the will of God. My question to us is, do we ever do that?
Do we ever worship with rules taught by people (verse 7) instead of with hearts for God? I’ve been in churches where, honestly, inappropriately dressed visitors[5] were asked to leave. I have heard of people asking others not to sing in church because they don’t sing well enough. I have heard people lament the cigarette butts outside their church or even make racist remarks in the service itself. I have seen people miss the whole worship experience because they were upset with other people’s fidgeting children or something else; what are some things that distract us from the heart of worship? I have heard people cry, for example, because others’ act of having a cigarette, they say, is going to send them to hell…
But Jesus, on the contrary, tells the crowd, verse 15, “Nothing outside a man can make him ‘unclean’ by going into him. Rather, it is what comes out of a man that makes him ‘unclean.’”
Now Jesus says a lot more in this little statement than I can possibly explain in my sermon today because – look at verse 19 – it says that along with everything else he is saying here, Jesus is declaring all foods clean. In our Bible studies, we’ve looked at how Jesus has redefined the Sabbath already, applauded his disciples for not fasting, and how he has openly exposed himself to ritual uncleanness on more than one occasion, and now Jesus is reinterpreting the dietary laws that govern so much of the Jewish traditional life: he is saying here that it is okay to have bacon for breakfast, ham sandwiches for lunch and pork chops for dinner. (Don’t forget its potluck today.) Now, this is alright by me for sure but the world of Jesus day is changing here – but this is, as they say, another story for another day
When Jesus tells the crowd, verse 15, “Nothing outside a man can make him ‘unclean’ by going into him. Rather, it is what comes out of a man that makes him ‘unclean,’” he is telling them a very simple truth: what we do, no matter how good, no matter how nice, no matter how proper, no matter how noble, what we do, will not get us into the Kingdom of Heaven. These good deeds, laws, rules, traditions, these things do not matter in this way. What comes from the outside world will neither keep us out of the Kingdom of God (see the parable of the Sheep and the Goats though –Matt. 23- there are certain things that communities that follow Jesus will inevitably do).
What will defile us, however, is what comes out of us (cf. vv.19, 20), Verse 21ff: “For from within, out of men’s hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and make a man ‘unclean.’” This is what defiles us.
So this is a very simple truth like I said…it is not what the world pours into us that purifies or defiles us, it is the effect we have on the world as what is inside of us is poured out.
There is a children’s story by Robert Munch (illustrated by Michael Marchenko) entitled the Paper Bag Princess[6]. In this story, Prince Ronald was about to marry Princess Elisabeth when a dragon comes smashes the castle, burns all the royal possessions and carries off – Prince Ronald.
So off to the rescue is Princess Elisabeth. There is only one problem though, the castle is smashed, she is all covered in soot and can’t find anything to wear except a dirt old paper bag.
Undaunted, she puts on the paper bag and proceeds to prove her Royal worth by out-manoeuvring, out-smarting, and defeating the dragon while rescuing Prince Ronald.
When Ronald sees his rescuer, He looks at her and says, “Elizabeth, you are a mess! You smell like ashes, your hair is all tangled and you are wearing a dirty old paper bag. Come back when you are dressed like a real princess.”
“Ronald, says Elisabeth, “your hair is nice and your clothes are all pretty, you look like a real prince but you are … [not].” They don’t get married after all.
You see, Prince Ronald was clean on the outside but he lacked some of the good fruit of Galatians 5 on the inside that we read about earlier. Elisabeth, however dirty she was on the outside, showed patience, perseverance, and other beautiful fruit; on the inside she was clean.
So today as we leave here and step out into the world I encourage us all to make sure that we are clean on the inside. Look at ourselves in the mirror of Mark Chapter 7 and make sure that our glasses are shiny indeed. Make sure that inside there is no, as Verse 21ff of our passage today says, make sure there are no “evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and make a man ‘unclean.’”
If upon examination, we do see these things, reflected in our glass, don’t worry, it doesn’t need to remain that way. There is a great detergent out there called ‘Sin Away’ produced by the blood of Jesus that can remove any stain and get those glasses as shiny as new again.
Then, as we seek the Lord and our glasses become clean, we will find that they are soon filled with, love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control and the like for against such things there is no law (cf. Gal 5:20-22).
Let us pray…
---
[1] Walter W. Wessel Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Mark/ Withdrawal From Galilee (6:14-8:30)/F. Commands of God and Traditions of Men (7:1-13), Book Version: 4.0.2: “..the Jewish custom of ceremonial hand washing [was] a custom based on the "tradition of the elders" (v. 3). This consisted in a great mass of oral tradition that had arisen about the law. About A.D. 200 it was written down in the Mishnah, but in Jesus day it was still in oral form. Its purpose was to regulate a mans life completely.”
[2] The word ‘hypocrite’ (hypokrites) literally means ‘play actor’.
[3] Isaiah 29:13 NIV from MSS: The Lord says: “These people come near to me with their mouth and honour me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules taught by men.” Jesus quoted from the LXX, but as you can see the meaning is in tact, even though the NIV translators translated different versions for the verse and the later quotation of the verse.
[4] CF Exod 20:12, 20:17; Deut 5:16; Lev 20:9.
[5] I think ‘visitors’ is a key term here. If the person is a regular attendee and is able to afford acceptable clothing to the congregation, it would be hoped that someone would encourage them to dress in such a way as to not cause their weaker brother/sister to stumble.
[6] Audio version: http://www.robertmunsch.com/books.cfm?bookid=27; Robert Munsch (Illustrator: Michael Marchenko). The Paper Bag Princess. Annick Press: 1980.
By Captain Michael Ramsay
We met John in the introductory story the other week. John is now married to Janet and they live somewhere up here in the North where he recently learned some lessons about shovelling snow. Now John didn’t always live here. He actually grew up in a big city down south many years ago. His graduating class though was only about the same size as Tisdale – not Tisdale’s grad class – all of Tisdale. Life was a little bit different.
Now John used to be a Mars Bar fan. Actually, he can still be led astray by a Mars Bar at times but once upon a time when he was in junior high, it got him into quite a bit of trouble.
But in John’s school of 3000 people there were two popular groups of kids: the INSIDE people and the OUTSIDE people. Now the INSIDE people were the one’s who had all the money. They wore the fashionable clothes, they were the one’s that as each of them turned 16, their parents were planning to buy them new cars. Their parents had all the fancy jobs and they knew they were special.
The outside people, on the other hand, didn’t necessarily have all that same stuff and so they hung out outside in jeans and a T-shirt all year long outside for two reasons – one because well, he didn’t live in Northern Saskatchewan so they could be outside in a just t-shirt all year long and 2) they were smokers and jr. high students -even back then- weren’t allowed to smoke in the schools.
John was neither in with the inside people nor out with the outside people but neither was he in with the outsiders nor out with the insiders; John was quite happy just hanging out in his own little world with a couple of friends until one day, something happened…
John’s social studies class was studying law and as a final project; everyone was going to get dressed up as different characters and have a mock trial. All the kids signed up for what they wanted – prosecution, defence, witnesses, accused, and the leftovers were on the jury. John was on the jury.
Now there was this fellow, Bill. Bill knew John but Bill was a very popular person –too popular for John - Bill was the defence attorney, Bill wanted to win this case and Bill was one of the inside people.
So at lunch hour there was John walking through the inside of the school - thinking about nothing more than, well, Mars Bars – when Bill, the inside person, approaches – “Hello John; how are you John; do you want a Mars Bar John?”
“Why yes I do,” says John thinking how lucky he is to have a Mars Bar offered to him right when he was wanting a Mars Bar…and he begins to eat it…
“Now all you have to do is to get the jury to vote for acquittal on the trial this afternoon,” says Bill, the INSIDE person, as John, thinking of nothing more than his Mars bar, agrees and heads OUTSIDE to go home for lunch and when he is OUTSIDE, he sees Silvia…
Silvia smiles at John. Silvia is a beautiful girl. Silvia is a popular girl. Silvia is an OUTSIDE girl. Silvia has never smiled at John before and Silvia – Silvia is prosecution in today’s trail and Silvia smiles at John.
John is quite surprised by all this attention so he quickly finishes his Mars bar, puts the wrapper in his pocket, scrapes he teeth clean and smiles back in an awkward, Jr. High school kind of way.
“John, what are you doing today … after school?” Silvia asks.
“Going home to watch TV, have a snack…”
“No,” says Silvia who is smiling in a teasing sort of way. “No” says Silvia “John, what are you doing today after school…with me…right after you convict the accused in law class?” She winks, turns, and walks away with the OUTSIDE people.
Oh…wow. Now, this is starting to sound like a date – John had never had a date before. He really didn’t know what to do, he just knew that this was turning out to be a great day; not only has he got his first ever date, but he also got a Mars Bar and …, oh wait.
Well, what to do now? John has a moral decision to make…should he support the OUTSIDE PERSON Silvia, or the INSIDE PERSON Bill who has already paid his bribe…then – for a fleeting moment - he wonders all together whether jurors should take bribes at all and then he has an idea; he runs home as fast as he can. He doesn’t stop to have lunch; he just grabs his change from his dresser. Just enough. He will buy Bill a Mars Bar, pay him back, and tell him that he can’t be bribed and then he’ll have a date with Silvia.
After he buys the Mars Bar on the way back to school, he becomes so pleased with his idea that he starts thinking about what he and Silvia could do on their date. They could go out to this coffee shop that sells deep fried Mars Bars and then it could become their place and they could go there everyday and have deep fried Mars Bars and John is really getting excited now about the prospect of this. He and Silvia could go and have a Mars Bar everyday together and then he thought that he could go for a Mars Bar right now and then, looking down, in all his excitement, he noticed that indeed he is having a Mars Bar right now…Bill’s Mars bar…uh oh.
Ding time for class.
John goes to class and he sees Bill, and the INSIDE people, and he musters as much courage as he can and he tells him that he can’t be bribed… and then he runs to hide in the jury box…
The trial goes well and the jury is sent to deliberate. John is sitting with the other jurors still dreaming of his life of Mars Bar dates with the OUTSIDE PERSON Silvia when all of a sudden he notices – the other Jurors – and one of them is a girl he’s never met before, an INSIDER PERSON named Janet, who says, “so its decided then, he’s innocent.”
“Guilty” says John, who is wondering how this could have gone so terribly wrong. “Innocent” says Janet, “Guilty” says John and Janet pulls out a Mars Bar…the accused gets off. John, never does get a date with Silvia, but he did get 3 Mars bars that day so he figures that it wasn’t all bad a day after all…
If you’ll turn with me to the Gospel of Mark, Chapter 7, you’ll notice that Jesus shares with us a little parable about the INSIDE and OUTSIDE of a cup as he speaks about moral dilemma not too far divorced from high school bribery of today’s story.
So here’s the situation: the Pharisees, who we’ve looked at before, they really do want to keep the law and all the traditions. They want everything to be perfect. They are sort of like an albeit misguided type of hyper-holiness movement of their day. It says in verses 3 and 4 that not only do they observe the washing of dishes, food, and hands, but they really do try to keep all the traditions.[1]
Jesus says that the Pharisees of our account here are missing the point. He quotes Isaiah, in Verses 6 and 7 and saying, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites;[2] as it is written: ‘These people honour me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men.’”[3]
He goes on, Verse 8: “You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human traditions.” These are harsh comments. Jesus isn’t really being gentle, meek and mild in this passage is he? He’s shooting from the hip – so to speak – and this is something he tends to do with the religious people, the synagogue-going people, the church people, isn’t it?
We’ve studied about how he extends so much charity to the outsiders but to those who should know better, he tells it like it is, doesn’t he? Jesus continues, verses 9-13, “And he said to them: ‘You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions! For Moses said, ‘Honour your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.’ But you say that if a man says to his father or mother: ‘Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is Corban’ (that is, a gift devoted to God), then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.’”[4]
Jesus says that by their very traditions they are transgressing the will of God. My question to us is, do we ever do that?
Do we ever worship with rules taught by people (verse 7) instead of with hearts for God? I’ve been in churches where, honestly, inappropriately dressed visitors[5] were asked to leave. I have heard of people asking others not to sing in church because they don’t sing well enough. I have heard people lament the cigarette butts outside their church or even make racist remarks in the service itself. I have seen people miss the whole worship experience because they were upset with other people’s fidgeting children or something else; what are some things that distract us from the heart of worship? I have heard people cry, for example, because others’ act of having a cigarette, they say, is going to send them to hell…
But Jesus, on the contrary, tells the crowd, verse 15, “Nothing outside a man can make him ‘unclean’ by going into him. Rather, it is what comes out of a man that makes him ‘unclean.’”
Now Jesus says a lot more in this little statement than I can possibly explain in my sermon today because – look at verse 19 – it says that along with everything else he is saying here, Jesus is declaring all foods clean. In our Bible studies, we’ve looked at how Jesus has redefined the Sabbath already, applauded his disciples for not fasting, and how he has openly exposed himself to ritual uncleanness on more than one occasion, and now Jesus is reinterpreting the dietary laws that govern so much of the Jewish traditional life: he is saying here that it is okay to have bacon for breakfast, ham sandwiches for lunch and pork chops for dinner. (Don’t forget its potluck today.) Now, this is alright by me for sure but the world of Jesus day is changing here – but this is, as they say, another story for another day
When Jesus tells the crowd, verse 15, “Nothing outside a man can make him ‘unclean’ by going into him. Rather, it is what comes out of a man that makes him ‘unclean,’” he is telling them a very simple truth: what we do, no matter how good, no matter how nice, no matter how proper, no matter how noble, what we do, will not get us into the Kingdom of Heaven. These good deeds, laws, rules, traditions, these things do not matter in this way. What comes from the outside world will neither keep us out of the Kingdom of God (see the parable of the Sheep and the Goats though –Matt. 23- there are certain things that communities that follow Jesus will inevitably do).
What will defile us, however, is what comes out of us (cf. vv.19, 20), Verse 21ff: “For from within, out of men’s hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and make a man ‘unclean.’” This is what defiles us.
So this is a very simple truth like I said…it is not what the world pours into us that purifies or defiles us, it is the effect we have on the world as what is inside of us is poured out.
There is a children’s story by Robert Munch (illustrated by Michael Marchenko) entitled the Paper Bag Princess[6]. In this story, Prince Ronald was about to marry Princess Elisabeth when a dragon comes smashes the castle, burns all the royal possessions and carries off – Prince Ronald.
So off to the rescue is Princess Elisabeth. There is only one problem though, the castle is smashed, she is all covered in soot and can’t find anything to wear except a dirt old paper bag.
Undaunted, she puts on the paper bag and proceeds to prove her Royal worth by out-manoeuvring, out-smarting, and defeating the dragon while rescuing Prince Ronald.
When Ronald sees his rescuer, He looks at her and says, “Elizabeth, you are a mess! You smell like ashes, your hair is all tangled and you are wearing a dirty old paper bag. Come back when you are dressed like a real princess.”
“Ronald, says Elisabeth, “your hair is nice and your clothes are all pretty, you look like a real prince but you are … [not].” They don’t get married after all.
You see, Prince Ronald was clean on the outside but he lacked some of the good fruit of Galatians 5 on the inside that we read about earlier. Elisabeth, however dirty she was on the outside, showed patience, perseverance, and other beautiful fruit; on the inside she was clean.
So today as we leave here and step out into the world I encourage us all to make sure that we are clean on the inside. Look at ourselves in the mirror of Mark Chapter 7 and make sure that our glasses are shiny indeed. Make sure that inside there is no, as Verse 21ff of our passage today says, make sure there are no “evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and make a man ‘unclean.’”
If upon examination, we do see these things, reflected in our glass, don’t worry, it doesn’t need to remain that way. There is a great detergent out there called ‘Sin Away’ produced by the blood of Jesus that can remove any stain and get those glasses as shiny as new again.
Then, as we seek the Lord and our glasses become clean, we will find that they are soon filled with, love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control and the like for against such things there is no law (cf. Gal 5:20-22).
Let us pray…
---
[1] Walter W. Wessel Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Mark/ Withdrawal From Galilee (6:14-8:30)/F. Commands of God and Traditions of Men (7:1-13), Book Version: 4.0.2: “..the Jewish custom of ceremonial hand washing [was] a custom based on the "tradition of the elders" (v. 3). This consisted in a great mass of oral tradition that had arisen about the law. About A.D. 200 it was written down in the Mishnah, but in Jesus day it was still in oral form. Its purpose was to regulate a mans life completely.”
[2] The word ‘hypocrite’ (hypokrites) literally means ‘play actor’.
[3] Isaiah 29:13 NIV from MSS: The Lord says: “These people come near to me with their mouth and honour me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules taught by men.” Jesus quoted from the LXX, but as you can see the meaning is in tact, even though the NIV translators translated different versions for the verse and the later quotation of the verse.
[4] CF Exod 20:12, 20:17; Deut 5:16; Lev 20:9.
[5] I think ‘visitors’ is a key term here. If the person is a regular attendee and is able to afford acceptable clothing to the congregation, it would be hoped that someone would encourage them to dress in such a way as to not cause their weaker brother/sister to stumble.
[6] Audio version: http://www.robertmunsch.com/books.cfm?bookid=27; Robert Munsch (Illustrator: Michael Marchenko). The Paper Bag Princess. Annick Press: 1980.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
