Showing posts with label Covenant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Covenant. Show all posts

Saturday, February 2, 2019

Joshua 9: and the Gibeonite Dilemma

Presented to Alberni Valley Ministries, 27 January 2019

A distinguished, prominent big city pastor cruised through a small town. As he did his eyes fell upon a child not more than two feet tall at the door of one of the houses. The boy was on tiptoes valiantly attempting to reach the doorbell. Amused and wanting to help, the pastor parked his car and went over to assist the boy. He reached up and pushed his finger onto the button and the chimes rang inside. Satisfied that he had done his good deed for the day, the pastor turned to the child, “Okay, what happens next­?”
With a smile the child replied, “Now we run!”

Another story: This lady goes to the doctor. She has been in serious pain for quite a while. The doctor asks her where it hurts and what is the matter. To which she replies, “It hurts when I touch my temple; it hurts when I touch my side; it hurts when I touch my arm; it even hurts when I touch my nose.”

“I think I know what the problem is”, the doctor says, “your finger is broken.”


Today we are going to talk both about being tricked and the pain associated with pulling against a covenant. The covenant we are talking about today is the one with the Gibeonites referred to in Joshua 9 and it is one of the most important in the Bible for understanding the workings of covenants.

Covenants are important and how we live in our covenant relationships have significant implications. We know what the Hebrew word for covenant means? Berit[h] literally means to be shackled together, to be bound. The Lord promised His people that He would never break His covenant with them. As such, we are not released from our covenants simply for disobeying them (Ro 7:2) and there are often significant consequences that result from trying to break an unbreakable bond (see Num 33:55; Jos 23:13).

This is important for us as Salvationists to remember because we are a covenanted people; we have the opportunity to enter into rich and strong covenant relationships with the Lord in the form of our Officers’ and Soldiers’ covenants. It is important for any of us living in the so-called ‘First World’ too where litigation, broken contracts, and divorces occur on a daily basis both inside and outside the churches and thus people miss out on the benefits of covenants. Because of this, we should all know to what we are agreeing to when we enter into a covenant with the LORD as either a partner or a witness.- be it a marriage or a Soldiership pledge or anything else. These next few weeks our focus in the Army world is Call and Commitment. This is when we ask you to consider responding to the opportunity to enter into a covenant with God as either a soldier or an Officer.

Covenants made with and before God are good things. The Lord uses covenants to give us direct access to strength, security, and blessing. The Lord made a promise to Abraham (Gen 12) that all the nations of the earth will be blessed through him and - even though Abraham and we have been unfaithful - God's promise is still fulfilled through Jesus Christ. The only reason any of us are saved is because the Lord is keeps His word. He is bound to us through His covenantal ties that will not be broken.

Even though God doesn't cancel a covenant because we disobey it there are still some serious consequences for pulling against it. In Joshua 9, Israel were disobeying an earlier covenant that they made with God to not make a treaty with the Canaanites and even to destroy them (Dt 7:1-6; 20:16-18). Also, in our passage inotice that the Canaanites lied to Joshua and the Israelite leaders: the leaders were tricked when they made the treaty with the Canaanites (Jos 9:15). They did not first discuss the matter with God and in making this covenant they disobeyed their earlier covenant with the LORD.

Betraying a promise to YHWH is not a trivial matter. In the book of Judges alone generations of people suffer as a result of this broken promise to God. For hundreds of years their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren and even more than that experience the consequences of continuing in rebellion against this covenant and this promise. The natural results of not respecting our covenants with or before God - whether or not we are tricked into them, whether or not we consult God before we call Him as a witness (Jos 9) - can be devastating.

The Israelites were tricked into making this covenant agreement with the Gibeonites (who are Canaanites). They didn’t realize that in so doing they were defying their previous promise to God. They entered into this new agreement under false pretences. The Gibeonites lied to them but that doesn’t change the fact that Israel is now bound through the covenant her leaders made with the Gibeonites before God. The leaders themselves are well aware that they are bound to keep this covenant (9:18). When the Israelites find out that they have been tricked, they don’t nullify the agreement: they realise that it is not within their authority to do so; Israel does not attack the Gibeonites. They don’t attack the Gibeonites because –even though they have been lied to, even though they have been tricked, even though they have been deceived – they are still bound to God and the Gibeonites via this treaty. Simply disobeying a covenant does not render it void. There are consequences for disregarding a promise but disobeying a promise made before God does not render that covenant void .[1] God says, through His angel, Judges 2:1: “I will NEVER break my covenant with you.” The covenant with or the covenant before God is not nullified; the ties are not severed just because one disobeys God.

There is another interesting point about the agreement that Israel enters into here. Israel enters into a covenant with God first that says that He will give them the land and that they will not make a covenant with the Canaanites: they will instead destroy the present inhabitants of the land. Then the Israelites –without consulting God– enter into the second covenant with the Gibeonites (who are Canaanites) promising that they will not destroy them and in the process Joshua and the Israelites disobey the first covenant agreement with God.

Israel is understandably held to its original agreement with YHWH. It is understandable that Israel suffers the consequences for disobeying God by making this competing covenant. What is interesting, however, is that the Israelites are also held accountable to this new covenant made before God with the Gibeonites even though they made it contrary to the expressed command of God. The Israelites disobeyed God in making this second covenant but they are still held accountable to it. God holds them accountable to both covenants: the one that He initiated and the one that He forbade. [2]

In Judges 2 we read the consequences of breaking the first covenant with God and in 2 Samuel 21 we see the consequences the Israelites suffer for breaking the second, competing covenant with the Gibeonites many years later. God holds us to our promises. As is evidenced here, whether we are lied to, tricked, or even enter into a covenant that is against the Lord’s commands, God holds us to our covenants that are made with Him either as a witness or as one of the parties Himself.

2 Samuel 21:1-5, 13-15:

During the reign of David, there was a famine for three successive years [people die]; so David sought the face of the LORD. The LORD said, “It is on account of Saul and his blood-stained house; it is because he put the Gibeonites to death.” The king summoned the Gibeonites and spoke to them. (Now the Gibeonites were not a part of Israel but were survivors of the Amorites; the Israelites had sworn to spare them, but Saul in his zeal for Israel and Judah had tried to annihilate them.) David asked the Gibeonites,

“What shall I do for you? How shall I make amends so that you will bless the LORD's inheritance?”

The Gibeonites answered him, “We have no right to demand silver or gold from Saul or his family, nor do we have the right to put anyone in Israel to death.”

“What do you want me to do for you?” David asked.

They answered the king, “As for the man who destroyed us and plotted against us so that we have been decimated and have no place anywhere in Israel, let seven of his male descendants be given to us to be killed and exposed before the LORD at Gibeah of Saul—the Lord 's chosen one.”

So the king said, “I will give them to you.”

13-15: “David brought the bones of Saul and his son Jonathan from there, and the bones of those who had been killed and exposed were gathered up. They buried the bones of Saul and his son Jonathan in the tomb of Saul's father Kish, at Zela in Benjamin, and did everything the king commanded. After that, God answered prayer in behalf of the land.”


Even though the Israelites disobeyed God by entering into this covenant with the Gibeonites (and suffered their due consequences for disobeying the covenant with God), when they disobeyed the Gibeonite covenant - even though it was made against the expressed will of God - God did not even answer their prayers until they made it right.

There are a couple of important things we need to know about our covenants with God, be they marriage covenants, soldier covenants, or officer covenants:

1), God does not sever His covenantal ties that bind us before Him; because

2) He is faithful to His promises even if we are faithless

This is important for us to remember. Again this is Call and Commitment time in the Army: We should not enter into our covenants lightly. I don’t believe that God says we can simply declare through secular courts that we are not happy with our partner so we are no longer married. I don’t believe God says that simply because we disobey our Soldiership agreement (by having a drink or whatever else) that we can throw out our covenant. I don’t think the tie is broken. I don’t think God says that just because we are not active Officers anymore that we are no longer have the opportunity to ‘make soul-saving the first purpose of our lives.’ I think God still supports us in these covenants. I think that this covenant referred to in Genesis 15, Judges 2, 1 Samuel 21 and here is Joshua 9 points to the fact that God doesn’t break His covenants with us but on the contrary, He will still be there for us when we need him. And this is important because if it is not true than none of us are saved; because if it is not true than God's salvation in conditional and we know that it is not - anyone who calls on the Name of the Lord can be saved.

This brings me to another point: covenants are not punishments; the consequences of pulling against our covenants are the natural and logical results of our own actions. Like we said, tje origin of the Hebrew word for ‘covenant’ comes from a root word meaning, ‘to be shackled together’. The image of a covenant then is of one being tied to God through a promise. One can compare a covenant with God (be it through marriage, Soldiership, Officership) to being seat-belted into a train (or SkyTrain), with God being the train. When we are belted in the train and ride comfortably in it – following the Lord’s lead - we wind up where He is going a lot faster and a lot easier than if we walk the tracks on our own. This is the benefit of a strong covenant with the Lord. However, once we are strapped in, if we try to go our own way or try to tie ourselves to something going in a different direction, it will not be a pleasant experience. The seatbelt doesn’t break. Disobeying our covenants is like jumping out of the train and trying to run in the opposite direction while we are still belted to it. It is going to hurt but this is not God’s fault. He doesn’t throw us from the train and, because God is faithful, this covenantal tie is so strong that it won’t break but we suffer are the natural results of our own actions. This is what happens in Joshua and Judges. God, wanting the Israelites to experience the full rest of the Promised Land, entered into a covenant with Abraham and then Israel. They willing belted themselves into His train but later the Israelites also tied themselves to the Gibeonite train that was going in a different direction and they suffered the consequences of their actions. This is exactly what happens to us when we don’t respect our covenants.

But there is good news in this and that good news saved the Gibeonites - even from the zeal of the of the Israelites' king. God saved the Gibeonites and God saved the Israelites. And this is good news for us for no matter how many times we are faithless and jump off that train. No matter how many times we try to break that covenant; no matter how many times we throw ourselves onto the tracks, under the wheels of the ‘God Train,’ the Lord is faithful: the covenantal tie will not be broken; God is faithful, and Jesus himself is standing there as the eternal tie that binds us in our relationship to God; Jesus provides the eternal covenant through whom whosoever may be pulled back up onto the train of everlasting life. As this is the case, instead of rebelling against God, instead of pulling against the tie that binds, let us all give our lives over fully to the Lord, buckle up, lean back and enjoy the fully sanctified ride on this train because this train is bound for glory.

See also:

Ramsay, Michael, 'Rights and Responsibilities of Covenants: a look at Judges 2' in Praise The Lord For Covenants: Old Testament wisdom for our world today. Vancouver, BC: Credo Press, 2010. (c) The Salvation Army. Available on-line: http://www.sheepspeak.com/ptl4covenants.htm

Captain Michael Ramsay, "Rights and Responsibilities of Covenant -a look at Judges 2", Journal of Aggressive Christianity, Issue 56 , Aug.-Sept.2008, p.48-55. On-line: http://www.armybarmy.com/JAC/article10-56.html

Michael Ramsay, Judges 2:1-5: Covenant and the Gibeonite Dilemma (a look at Judges 2:1-5 through the lenses of Joshua 9 and 2 Samuel 21). Presented to Nipawin and Tisdale Corps on May 18, 2008. Available on-line: https://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/05/judges-21-5-covenant-and-gibeonite.html

Saturday, October 27, 2018

1 Chronicles 13: Seeing about a House.

Presented to Alberni Valley Ministries, 28 October 2018 by Captain Michael Ramsay

This week is October 31st so I thought that it would be good to start off with an October 31st quiz today (answers at bottom):[1]

1)      What event happened in Wittenberg on October 31 in 1517?
2)      True or False: Ghosts are mentioned in the Bible.
3)      True or False: A king of Israel went to a witch to speak with the spirit of a dead person
4)      Bonus Marks name the King, the dead person, and the witch
5)      How many people can you name who the Bible records God used to raise others from the dead?
6)      The man possessed by so many demons that they called themselves Legion, where did he live?
7)      True or False: Jesus tells a parable about a haunted house?

Luke 11:24-26: “When an evil spirit comes out of a man, it goes through arid places seeking rest and does not find it. Then it says, ‘I will return to the house I left.’ When it arrives, it finds the house swept clean and put in order. Then it goes and takes seven other spirits more wicked than itself, and they go in and live there. And the final condition of that man is worse than the first.” The house is haunted by more demons than it was in the first place. This is in the Parable of the Haunted House.

One Halloween I will inevitably preach on the parable of the haunted house. Today we will look at a different passage about a house: 1 Chronicles 17: The LORD, David, and Nathan have an interesting and very important discussion about this house. J. Barton Payne says of this discussion in chapter 13 that the heart of 1 Chronicles is to be found in this chapter.[2] Nupanga Weanzana calls it one of the most important in the presentation of the history of Israel in all of Chronicles.[3] Bruce Birch writes of the sister passage to this one, 2 Samuel 7: "this chapter is the most important theological text … perhaps the entire Deuteronomistic History.'[4] So this passage is significant.

The chapter starts off with King David sitting in his house and he is talking to one of the prophets, Nathan. And, he says Verse 1&2:
 “Here I am, living in a house of cedar, while the ark of the covenant of the LORD is under a tent.”
       Nathan replied to David, “Whatever you have in mind, do it, for God is with you.”

Have you ever said something without thinking? Made a joke and regretted immediately afterward or maybe you said someone else would do something without checking with them first or maybe you agreed to something that you really weren't listening to? Or maybe you just said something and thought afterwards…'why did I say that?' Have you ever said something thoughtless and then stayed awake all night worrying or thinking about it? I think this may be Nathan's position here because the very next verse says that night, the word of the Lord came to Nathan…

And this is kind of neat too for it sort of speaks of the closeness of Nathan to the Lord, I think. For God seems to be approaching Nathan in the way a wife may approach a husband who has just invited a bunch of friends over without asking her first or said something that she didn't want him to say. It is like something has come up with work or one of the children and Nathan has not dealt with it quite right. Nathan told David, without asking God first, that David could go and build a house for God and God is not happy to not have been asked first. God says to Nathan: You, Verses 4-10.

4 “Go and tell my servant David, ‘This is what the LORD says: You are not the one to build me a house to dwell in. 5 I have not dwelt in a house from the day I brought Israel up out of Egypt to this day. I have moved from one tent site to another, from one dwelling place to another. 6 Wherever I have moved with all the Israelites, did I ever say to any of their leaders whom I commanded to shepherd my people, “Why have you not built me a house of cedar?”’
       7 “Now then, tell my servant David, ‘This is what the LORD Almighty says: I took you from the pasture, from tending the flock, and [I] appointed you ruler over my people Israel. 8 I have been with you wherever you have gone, and I have cut off all your enemies from before you. Now I will make your name like the names of the greatest men on earth. 9 And I will provide a place for my people Israel and [I] will plant them so that they can have a home of their own and no longer be disturbed. Wicked people will not oppress them anymore, as they did at the beginning 10 and have done ever since the time I appointed leaders over my people Israel. I will also subdue all your enemies.

I think that passage is quite neat. It speaks of both God's relationship to Nathan and of God's relationship to David. In this conversation here God is letting Nathan know that, yes, He is in charge and Nathan is not to forget that but God still loves Nathan enough to ask him to go and make his error right. God trusts Nathan still, even though he made the mistake of speaking without thinking or speaking for God before speaking to Him.

And the message that God gives Nathan here conveys as similar sentiment to David. God tells Nathan to tell David that He does not want anything in the way of a house from David. He has been quite fine without a house for all of this time why would He need one now? Not only that, God says in this context, why do I need you to do anything for me? Remember that it is I who has done all of these things for you; not the other way around. You need me, I don't need you.  And He doesn't stop there God says, in essence; however, I love you and will continue to do good things for both you and my people Israel and I will make your name famous, as famous as anyone's and He does.

In these short two paragraph's God has both rebuked the prophet Nathan and the king David and He has also comforted them reminding them that He loves them. (I love my kids) In this way God reminds me of a good parent. You discipline your children but you let them know that you still love them more than you even thought you could. You still want to involve them in as much of your life as they can be involved in. This is what the story is about so far but then we get to the next paragraph and the next paragraph is among the most significant in the whole old testament.

God says to David, through Nathan, Verses 10-14:
   “‘I declare to you that the LORD will build a house for you: 11 When your days are over and you go to be with your ancestors, I will raise up your offspring to succeed you, one of your own sons, and I will establish his kingdom. 12 He is the one who will build a house for me, and I will establish his throne forever. 13 I will be his father, and he will be my son. I will never take my love away from him, as I took it away from your predecessor. 14 I will set him over my house and my kingdom forever; his throne will be established forever.’”

Who is this passage speaking about? Jesus. It is even quoted in the Gospels, in the NT. Luke 1:32, this is the very passage to which the angle Gabriel refers when he tells Mary that she is going to have the baby Jesus! (As a side note - this is interesting I think anyway - when David says he wants to build a house/palace for God, the Bible uses the exact same word when God declines and says that He will build a house/dynasty for David, which of course He does through Jesus)[5]

Somewhere along the lines either by accident or intent, this promise gets a little bit muddled in people's understanding of it. People, by accident or design start to think of the promise as fulfilled through David's descendants (plural) who will sit on the throne forever as a series of people rather than as one person (as Paul points out in Galatians 3:16)[6] and people begin to think of the temple that was to be built in Jerusalem as the House of God (John 4).

Some questions for you about the Temple: There were many temples: who ordered the first temple built on that spot? King Solomon. Do we know what famous building is on that same spot today? The Dome on the Rock. Do we know how many temples have actually been built on that same spot? 3 or 4 depending on how you count them. After Solomon's Temple was destroyed, Zerubbabel, the governor, had the second temple built in 516 BCE, and then years after it was destroyed, King Herod, who we know from the Christmas story, built the a temple that was destroyed in 70 CE, not that long after Jesus' death. And apparently too there was even another temple that was built in Samaria but the Jews destroyed that one themselves in 128 BCE before Herod ever built his temple[7] and, like we said, the mosque, the Dome on the Rock, sits on that spot today. There have been a lot of temples there built by people who don't seem to understand what the Gospel writers and the early church understood - that God's temple isn't a building. And the descendent of David who is actually going to build it is Jesus because the passage says that the one who builds it will be God's Son and his throne will last forever (Cf. Luke 1:32, Galatians 3:16).

This is important. After he establishes his throne by seeing his brothers killed and before he builds this massive palace for himself, King Solomon builds a temple in Jerusalem. There is then this big ceremony where it is dedicated and God Himself, in a cloud, enters the temple (2 Chronicles 5:14). From this point on many people make the mistake of thinking that God is actually contained in the temple.

This reminds me of a story I read somewhere:
There were some people in the US a while back who thought that they had discovered the oldest place in the universe. They then figured that if it is the oldest place in the universe then that must be where God lives – as it was the first place to exist. They then spend over $20 000.00 to build the necessary equipment to transmit electronic impulses or radio waves or something like that into space; they build a website and offer people the opportunity to talk to God on-line. To this day, apparently many people have sent messages into deep space thinking that that is where God is and that that is the only or best way He will hear them. God is not confined to a star in deep space or to a temple in Jerusalem. God is omnipresent and God loves us.

But many people from the time of Solomon on actually believed that the temple was God's home that He was confined to that building much like a genie is confined to a lamp and they may have began to almost treat God like that. They seemed to believe that they were invincible and could do whatever they wanted because God was all powerful and they had Him contained in this building in their city. God would thus never let the city, much less the temple be destroyed,. God is all powerful and they have him contained like Aladdin had the genie trapped in the lamp and He and all His power would always be theirs.

Then the unthinkable happened, in 586 BCE, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, after a long siege sacked the city, destroyed the temple and wiped out the Kingdom of Judah forever. People did not know what to do, their faith was shaken. They thought they were invincible. They thought God was contained in the Temple. They put their faith in this building instead of in God. When the Temple was destroyed they thought God was beaten. And then they were led off to captivity.

My question for us today is do we ever fall into the same trap? Do we put our faith in buildings - like church buildings (aren’t they called the 'House of God'?) or parliament buildings? Or do we put our faith in people - like pastors or politicians or relatives or friends or husbands or wives or church leaders or famous people? Do we put our faith in denominations or political parties? Do we put our faith in institutions or agencies? Do we ever put our faith in doctors or lawyers? Do we put our faith in our health or our strength or our good looks? Do we put our faith in systems like capitalism or democracy or our country or our province or our city? Or anything else? Or anyone else? Don't.

When we do this we are putting our faith in empty temples and deep space radio transmissions. People, systems, governments, denominations, politicians, church leaders, our friends and our family, even our good looks and our strength at some time will let us down. Our friends, our loved ones, and people we idolize will let us down. It is true and it is sad. Just like it was sad when the temple was destroyed and just like it was sad when Nathan carelessly answered David and said that yes he could go ahead and build one of these temples.

But the Good News is this. God loves Nathan and God loves David and God loves you and God loves me and He has provided for us all. And He has provided for us not an empty temple or a star in outer space but He has raised up Jesus; and God is His Father and Jesus is His Son. And Jesus sits on God's throne forever and He will never take His love away from Him.

And as we serve Jesus, we have access to that all-encompassing, everlasting love of God who will never leave us nor forsake us. So today, with that in mind - there are serious troubles in our world and serious troubles sometimes in our lives - I encourage us as this is the case, not to put our faith in systems or people or traditions or ourselves to save us for we can't. But no matter how difficult our circumstance there is one who can save us. There is one will walk with us through all of our difficulties. There is one who loves and protects us and that one is Jesus and He is able more than able to handle what concerns us today and tomorrow and for ever more for our salvation comes from Christ and Christ alone.
 More daily blogs at
More articles, sermons, and papers at

[1] Answers to introductory quiz: 1) Luther nailed his 95 theses to the door of the church, 2) True, especially The Holy Ghost 3) True, see 1 Samuel 28 (the king was Saul, the dead person was Samuel, and the witch was the Witch of Endor) 4) God used Elijah to raise the son of the widow of Zarephath (1 Kings 17:17-23), God used Elisha to raise the Shunammite woman's son (2 Kings 4:32-37);There was the man they threw into Elisha’s grave (2 Kings 13:21). Jesus raised: the widow's son (Luke 7:12-15), Jairus' daughter (Luke 8:49-55), and Lazarus (John 11:43,44). God used Peter to raise Dorcas (Acts 9:37-40) and Paul to raise Eutychus (after Paul had bored him to death? Acts 20:9-12) 5) The man possessed lived among in the graveyard, among the tombs near Gerasenes (Mark 5:1,2, Luke 8:26-27) 6) True, Matthew 12:25-29, Mark 3:23-27, Luke 11:17-22.
[2] J. Barton Payne, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:1 Chronicles/Exposition of First Chronicles/II. The Reign of David (10:1-29:30)/B. David's Rise (11:1-20:8)/5. Nathan's prophecy (17:1-27), Book Version: 4.0.2
[3] Nupanga Weanzana, '1 Chronicles 17:1-27 David forbidden to build the temple' in Africa Bible Commentary (Nairobi, Kenya: WordAlive, 2010), 488
[4] Bruce C. Birch, 'The First and Second Books of Samuel' in New Interpreter’s Bible, Vol. 2, ed. Leander E. Keck, et el. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1998), 1254.
[5] Cf. J. Barton Payne, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:1 Chronicles/Exposition of First Chronicles/II. The Reign of David (10:1-29:30)/B. David's Rise (11:1-20:8)/5. Nathan's prophecy (17:1-27), Book Version: 4.0.2
[6] This verse specifically refers to Jesus as a descendant of Abraham but, of course, we know that Jesus is also an heir of the promise made to David and so Paul's point stands in relation to both the Abrahamic and the Davidic covenants.
[7] Gail R. O’Day, The Gospel of John, The New Interpreter's Bible, Vol. 9, ed Leander E. Keck, et. al. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1995),563.

Thursday, September 7, 2017

2 Samuel 7: David's Kayak.

Presented to 614 Warehouse Mission 2:30pm service, 
10 September 2017.

This has been a weird summer for us. We didn't have any real family vacations. The older girls were both working. Rebecca was working out of town at Jacksons and Sarah-Grace was working at day camps; so we mostly just had Heather who we tried to keep busy through some great summer camps and lessons. We did try to make to most of our time together. The older girls and I went down to Buffalo to see G'n'R and Live in concert and just the other weekend we saw Alice Cooper and Deep Purple here in Toronto.  Susan, the younger two girls and I went to see the Martyr's Shrine where Father Brebeuf and the others were martyred. That was really interesting. Sarah-Grace and I were going to go to an Argos game and Heather and I did go to a Blue Jays game. It was actually quite a full and busy summer on top of Karaoke nights and the rest of things around here.

There were a couple of big corps events as well. Yesterday was the Cabbage Town festival here and Friday we went to see the Niagara Falls and early in the summer we went to see Howard fall out of a kayak. It is a good thing we weren't anywhere near the falls when Howard falls into the water. I may share about this story a little more in a little bit but I should probably get onto today's topic.

Today we are chatting a little bit about covenant. Covenant is a topic that I know a little bit about with my book and a number of articles that have been published on this topic.[1] However, I must confess that, like the Apostle Paul, I have spent much more time looking at God's covenant with Abraham than I have His covenant with David.[2] Today we are going to look God's covenant with David. Who can tell me what is a covenant? And what does the word 'berit[h]' (covenant) literally mean? (bound).[3] In our passage here today God binds David, Jacob, and all of humanity to Himself in an important covenant.[4] Bruce Birch writes that "this chapter is the most important theological text in the books of Samuel and perhaps the entire Deuteronomistic History.'[5] Let's take a look at how that works.

First it is very interesting: When the chapter opens, we have the king sitting in a palace of some sort. He must be a little board. It says he has a rest from his enemies and later we read about some of the other stuff he does when he is board but today he starts off pretty good. He must have been thinking about the Lord as, Verse 2, 'he said to Nathan the prophet, “Here I am, living in a house of cedar, while the ark of God remains in a tent.”
           3 Nathan replied to the king, “Whatever you have in mind, go ahead and do it, for the LORD is with you.”

Have you ever had a moment when you say or do something without thinking and then, oh oh...? Have we ever just answered someone quickly without thinking about it or - worse - has anyone ever involved someone else without checking first. Think of the stereotypical husband in the old days before cell phones who invites his friends over for dinner without checking with his wife first. Think about the wife who lets the kids or someone else borrow a tool or something else of dad's without checking with him. Have we ever been in a spot where we answer someone quickly without checking or without thinking. This is what the Lord's prophet does here when, verse 3, 'Nathan replied to the king, “Whatever you have in mind, go ahead and do it, for the LORD is with you.”

Verse 4 records that that night the Word of the Lord comes to Nathan and says, basically, 'why didn't you check with me first!?' and then He opens up on Nathan like a steadfast wife; He says, you tell  David this and you tell David that and then tell David one more thing. You ask David this and you tell David the other thing.  You ask David, Verse 7, ' Wherever I have moved with all the Israelites, did I ever say to any of their rulers whom I commanded to shepherd my people Israel, “Why have you not built me a house of cedar?”’ The Lord then talks about all the things He has done for David and all the things He has done for Israel. He doesn’t need David to build Him a house. God makes that abundantly clear and God doesn’t want David to build Him a house and Nathan should just march right back there and let David know that. God has been fine without a house until now and he will continue to be fine without a house.

Nathan before God here must feel a little like Howard on our kayaking trip this summer. No sooner had we gotten on the river, out of sight of the kayak rental place and all their equipment when ‘snap’ Howard’s paddle breaks in two. That cannot be a good omen. If this were a Shakespeare play you would know that something bad was going to happen to poor Howard before the trip was done – and you wouldn’t be wrong. We set up Howard as best we could but he was an inexperienced kayaker in the current; he really was up the creek without half a paddle. More about this later. But in the end God took care of Howard and God took care of Nathan. (And God took care of David)

After God finishes the exchange with Nathan about all of this, God has one more thing to tell him. The one more thing He has to tell Nathan is that God is going to build a dynasty for David and this is interesting – in the Hebrew there is a play on words that actually exists in the English translations as well. The word ‘house’ can mean a building or a dynasty: for instance, our current monarchy is from the House of Windsor, formerly the House of Hanover, meaning the family dynasty of Windsor. It is the same in Hebrew: David says he is going to build a house (a temple) for God but God says no, He is going to build a house (a dynasty) for David. This part actually reads a little bit like a love letter between two young people.[6] I don’t know if any of you have managed to keep any old love letters from years gone by or if you have even just noticed young love in action. I think we have all seen young people just in a new relationship, right? This exchange reminds me a little bit about that: 'No you’re the cutest and I am going to build you a big house of love'.
                  'No you’re the cutest and I am going to build you a big house of love'.
                  'No, no, no, you are… '
David wants to build a house, a palace for God but God will not except it from David. Instead God is going to build a house, a dynasty from David that will last forever.[7]

God loves David. David, after all, as 1 Samuel 13:14 and Acts 13:22 say, David is ‘a man after God’s own heart’. Now, you may stop me at this point and say, ‘hold on there, Captain! It’s all fine and dandy to say David is a man after God’s own heart but we’ve skipped ahead in 2 Samuel and we’ve been reading about him over the past few weeks and David doesn’t always sound like a great guy. He’s a horrible father! His kids seem to hate him. He commits adultery with Bathsheba, murders her husband and then has her come live with him and his other wives and their kids. He seems to treat a lot of people poorly and after his own son tries to overthrow him it seems that it is only by the grace of God through the (maybe even deplorable) actions of his nephew Joab that he and his house even exist at all. And I remember we read the other week that God said about David, 2 Samuel 12:9-10, “Why did you despise the word of the Lord by doing what is evil in his eyes? … Now, therefore, the sword will never depart from your house, because you despised me and took the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your own.’ David is a man who got into all kinds of trouble; so how can this be the same man who loves God and who God loves in this way? Good question. Let me try to explain it this way…

Going back to the kayaking trip, after Howard’s paddle breaks and things are looking a little shakey for the trip, we set up Howard as best we can but he is an inexperienced kayaker in the current and, in reality, he is up the creak without half a paddle. He makes it for a while then he hits a rock in the fast moving current. He capsizes and his boat fills up with water very rapidly and drifts downstream as it begins sinking quickly. Howard doesn’t know what he is doing and most of the people on our trip don’t know what they are doing either. I am the only experienced kayaker there and we are all floating downstream very quickly as Howard crashes on the rocks and abandons ship as his craft begins to sink. I send Rob back to keep him company while I try to empty the kayak of water mid-stream with Sam as the two of us are being carried downstream farther and farther from Howard. I can’t empty his kayak in the water. It is too full. Sam and I guide the boat to the river bank whereby I get out of my kayak, then lift Howard’s water-filled kayak over my head and dump it out. I’m exhausted. This is a lot of work. Then Sam and I have to paddle upstream, against the current to try to get the kayak back to Howard so that we can try to put him back in his boat. And...until now Howard has been sitting nicely on a rock by Rob who has been keeping him company. All we need to do is pull Howard’s kayak up to the rock and he can climb in easily. I’m exhausted and I am just thinking that it is great that we can just load Howard in his boat from a rock rather than –in our exhausted state- drag Howard up out of the water when Howard decides to jump into to water  and swim to us! We do eventually get him out and no one is the worse for wear and we have a great story and a lot we have learned from this experience.

This is like David. His staying home when kings go off to work was when his paddle broke. He made subsequent choices and experienced the consequences of those choices that must have exhausted him and those around him but God like Rob, Sam, and I did not give up on him. God metaphorically paddled all the way upstream; even though David must have seemed like he was exhausting God by jumping in the current of sin. God never gave up on David. David’s actions had some serious consequences and he broke more than just a paddle but God loved him all the same and God fought against the current to be faithful to His covenant - in spite of all the strange moves David made. This is very important. The scriptures, Romans 3:3-4, ask us, “What if some were unfaithful? Will their unfaithfulness nullify God’s faithfulness?” The answer is of course not. Once God commits to a covenant He will be faithful even if we are faithless. This is the whole point of covenants and this is how God saves us through them. God will never abandon a covenant before it has been completed. He is faithful even when we are faithless.[8]

And this is good news. Anything less would be a works-based salvation, salvation achieved by our own merit, skill, and ability, and as the Apostle Paul points out that is an impossibility. None of us can achieve salvation on our own. We need God to save us. None of us can pull ourselves from the fast moving current by ourselves; we all need Jesus to do it for us – and he has through the cross and the empty tomb. God promised David that He would build an everlasting dynasty through him and He does. Jesus is the heir to David’s dynasty and Jesus reigns forever; so no matter how many times the devil may tempt David or you or I to sin that will not nullify the Word of God.[9] There is nothing that will ever cause God to break His promise of salvation for any of us – the only question is whether we will avail ourselves of that salvation or not, whether we will be pulled back into the kayak of salvation or whether we will choose to drown in our sins. And no matter what sins we have committed in our lives, make no mistake, it is not too much or too late, while we still have breath in our body we can still let Jesus lift us into that kayak of eternal salvation.

This is what the passage we are looking at today is talking about. God is faithful to his covenant (and still offers each of us the opportunity for eternal salvation) even when David is not; God is faithful to his covenant (and still offers each of us the opportunity for eternal salvation) even when Israel is not; God is faithful to his covenant (and still offers each of us the opportunity for eternal salvation) even when we are not. No matter what we have done, God has his arms out ready to accept us into His salvation.

In our passage today, it introduces us to everlasting life by saying that the Lord’s kingdom will last forever, and it will be ruled by David’s successor, Jesus, for all time and nothing can change that. The only question for us today is, do you and I choose to drown in the quickly moving current of all the temptations and sins of our world or do we accept the eternal joy of that salvation by riding peacefully down the river of eternal life in the kayak of Christ? It is my hope that each of us will choose Christ.
  

Questions for further exploration listed below.
---


[1] Captain Michael Ramsay. Praise The Lord For Covenants: Old Testament wisdom for our world today. Vancouver, BC: Credo Press, 2010. (c) The Salvation Army. For more info: http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Praise-The-Lord-For-Covenants/155941614427110?v=info
[2] Cf. Michael Ramsay, 'Covenant: When God is Bound...a look at Genesis 15:7-21'. Journal of Aggressive Christianity, Issue 52, December 2007 – January 2008, p 5. On-line at http://www.armybarmy.com/pdf/JAC_Issue_052.pdf
[3] G.E. Mendenhall. "Covenant." In The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, edited by George Arthur Buttrick. (Nashville, Tennessee: Abingdon Press, 1962), 715. Cf. also M. Weinfeld. "berith." In Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, edited by G. Johannes Botterweck. (Stuttgart, W.Germany: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1975), 253.
[4] Cf. Michael Ramsay, "Berit[h]" Journal of Aggressive Christianity, Issue 40, December 2005 – January 2006 pp 16-17.
[5] Bruce C. Birch, 'The First and Second Books of Samuel' in New Interpreter’s Bible, Vol. 2, ed. Leander E. Keck, et el. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1998), 1254.
[6] Cf. Gbile Akanni and Nupanga Weanzana, Africa Bible Commentary, (Nairobi, Kenya: Word Alive Publishers, 2010), '2 Samuel 7:5-15:Nathan's Prophetic Declaration', 387
[7] Cf. Bruce C. Birch, 'The First and Second Books of Samuel' in New Interpreter’s Bible, Vol. 2, ed. Leander E. Keck, et el. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1998), 1255 and Gbile Akanni and Nupanga Weanzana, Africa Bible Commentary, (Nairobi, Kenya: Word Alive Publishers, 2010), '2 Samuel 7:5-15:Nathan's Prophetic Declaration', 388
[8] Captain Michael Ramsay. Praise The Lord For Covenants: Old Testament wisdom for our world today. Vancouver, BC: Credo Press, 2010. (c) The Salvation Army. This is the thesis statement of PTL4C: http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Praise-The-Lord-For-Covenants/155941614427110?v=info 
[9] Cf. Gbile Akanni and Nupanga Weanzana, Africa Bible Commentary, (Nairobi, Kenya: Word Alive Publishers, 2010), '2 Samuel 7:1-17:The Promise of a Dynasty', 387

---

Questions for further exploration

       I.            Life

1.      What is something you noticed about God this week?

    II.            Text

2 Samuel 7

Leader's note:
·         This passage is the record of the Davidic Covenant. It, along with the Abrahamic Covenant, points to the Good News of Salvation through Jesus Christ. Jesus, descended from David's line (house) will rule eternally.
·         There is an interesting play on words both in HB and in English in this chapter. The word for 'house' can mean 'building' or 'dynasty' / 'family line'. Ie: the house of Windsor (formerly Hanover) is our current Canadian Monarchy. In this passage then David wants to build a house (building) for God but God says instead He will build a house (dynasty) through David.

1.      What happened in this story?



2.      Re-read 2 Samuel 7:1-4:The king lets Nathan know what he intends to do, 7:1-2, (presumably for either feedback or approval); Nathan replies, 7:3, 'Whatever you have in mind, go ahead and do it, for the LORD is with you.' That night, 7:4ff, the Word of LORD says something very different.

a. Do we ever speak without thinking and then afterwards have to back track?

b. Nathan is a prophet of God; David is God's annointed king. They both made an error here: what was it? How could it be avoided?

c. David seems to have been led astray by good intentions; what were his good intentions? Do we ever fail to consult God because our intentions are good and are plans seem good - like here building a temple/house for God?

d. Nathan made the assumption that because 'the LORD is with David' that whatever he had in mind was good; do we ever blindly accept or reject things because of where/who they come from?

e. Even when we have good plans, they may be wrong; even when others have good plans they may be wrong; how can we be sure that what we are doing is what God wants us to do?

f. Give an example of when you listened to and obeyed God.


3.      God has done a lot for David, 7:5-7; God has done a lot for Israel, 7:8-11. List some of those things from the text. God has done a lot for us; what are some of the things God has done for you?


4.      2 Samuel 7:11-16 (along with Genesis 12:1-3) is one of the most important pericopes in the Old Testament.

a.  what strikes you about these verses?

b. Verse 16 states that "your house and your kingdom will endure forever before me; your throne will be established forever" Who is the member of David's house (dynasty; his ancestors) who will sit on the throne forever?

c. Do you serve Jesus who is the ruler who rules forever? Are you a citizen of the Nation/Country/Kingdom of God? Do you want to be?

If you have never prayed to dedicate your life to God and to serve Jesus forever, you are welcome to pray: Lord Jesus please accept my life in service to You. Please forgive my sins and please come into my heart for now and forever more. In Jesus' Name, amen.

Friday, September 16, 2016

Hosea 6:6, Matthew 9:13: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’

Presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, 13 June 2010 and Corps 614 Regent Park and The Warehouse Mission, 16 Sept 2016, and Alberni Valley Ministries, 30 April 2023

To view the 2010 version, complete with footnotes, please click herehttp://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2010/06/matthew-913-i-desire-mercy-not.html 



Our scripture that we are looking at today comes from Hosea 6:6 and Matthew 9:13: “But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'  I desire mercy…

Summer has just passed. On the prairies some people have really fancy cars that live indoors most of the year and only came on nice sunny days. Some of these are CLASSIC cars. Many farmers are also mechanics and so spend a lot of time working on their vehicles. It sort of reminds me of my younger days. I remember when I was a teenager. I was blessed to be able to afford a car that I could fix up a little bit too. Not quite as fancy as those sports cars in Saskatchewan but here’s a picture of it…



Okay that’s not my car – that is Fred Flintstone’s mobile but that isn’t entirely dissimilar from my car. My car only cost $100 and see how Fred’s car is propelled… It only moves because he runs with his feet sticking out the bottom. That was sort of like my Pontiac. It, like Fred’s car, didn’t have any floorboards at all on the passenger’s side – so my passengers had to be careful not to drop anything on the floor because it would be gone. It was allegedly a two-door but the driver’s door never worked. This sometimes made it a little difficult especially considering one of my friends for part of this time was confined to a wheelchair so whenever I gave them a ride I would either have to climb over them to get into the car or more likely get in Dukes of Hazard style. (You remember the Duke’s of Hazard where they would climb in through the windows instead of using the door?) – Actually, before I was done with my car, we always had to get in Dukes of Hazard style because the other door broke too. Nonetheless I loved my first car. It was all mine. It did have one good thing about it. It had four really nice moon discs. They were shiny, they were good solid hubcaps and they were really cool.

‘I desire mercy’ is a quote from our text today. I remember I used to let friends of mine drive my car for a number of different reasons. One friend of mine – Billy, he’s a great guy – we’re teenagers and he has his learner’s licence. We load the car up with many of our friends and we go cruising around the town. At one point we decide to go through the drive through and get some water to drink (we couldn’t afford to buy anything else) so – Billy is still driving – he takes us through the drive through and he cuts the corner too close and - ‘crunch’ – there goes my front moon disk and then instead of stopping, (because he is an inexperienced driver) he keeps going and ‘crunch’; there goes a second one. Billy is so upset as he is chased from my car by our friends. He starts walking home feeling quite sad. I take over driving. We order enough waters from the A&W for everyone in the car and one for Billy too – remember the quote from the scriptures, ‘I desire mercy’ – we pull up beside him. He comes up to the car and then we – well – we pelt him with our waters. Okay maybe that is not a good example of mercy. We sacrificed our water instead of offering mercy. Whoops. We got it a little backwards.

Jesus said, “I desire mercy, not sacrifice’. This is significant. Look at what is happening in our text today. Jesus is having one of his all too familiar conflicts with the religious teachers. Verse 9 records that Jesus is walking along after performing a sensational faith healing in front of a large audience, Verse 8. Verse 9, he sees a tax collector and Jesus invites this tax collector over for dinner – no, he doesn’t actually. He really invites himself over to the tax collector’s house for dinner and the tax collector (Matthew) accepts.

Now we should put things in perspective a little bit here. Jesus is famous. He is like a televangelist before TV with all of his faith healings and exorcisms and he even controls the weather. More than that even: with his high popularity ratings he is kind of like an earlier version of popular reality TV shows: ‘Judean Idol’ or ‘Survivor Palestine’ or something like that. Jesus is as popular as Jose Batista was after his bat flip as the Jays had an incredible post-season last year. He is as popular as any music star or athlete. Just like contemporary celebrities, crowds are following Jesus everywhere he is going. He even has to hop on a boat after the miracle of the fish and the loaves to get away from them and then in front of his disciples and whoever else was on the Sea of Galilee at that time he even calms the storm (Mt 8:18-27; Mk 4:36-41; Lk 8:22-25). Jesus is a pretty popular celebrity preacher and all the people are following him and this celebrity Jesus sees this tax collector and he invites himself over for dinner.

Anybody have a favourite celebrity here? Call out a name or two… what if _____ invited himself over to your place for dinner, would you accept? Of course. This is what Matthew does.

Now there is more. Who is Matthew, this fellow whom Jesus has invited himself over to his house? Matthew is a tax collector. Strictly speaking he is more like a customs official, but it was the same idea and expressed with the same Greek word: either way he collects taxes for Rome. Tax collectors are not the most popular people in the world these days.

It was even worse in Jesus' day. Do you remember who controlled Palestine in Jesus’ day? The Romans – the Superpower of the day. Palestine was an occupied territory. I used to lead D-Day and Nov 11 Remembrances with the veterans each year. Paying taxes to the Romans would be the same as the Dutch or the French paying taxes to the Nazis. It would be like Afghanistan paying taxes to NATO or Iraq paying taxes to the USA. The Americans – in their own revolution – cited as one of their causes for starting that war the fact that they didn’t want to pay taxes even to support their own military. People generally aren’t so fond of paying taxes. As a Judean, for Matthew, collecting taxes from his own people to pay Caesar would be like collaborating with the enemy (cf. Mt 22:15-22, Mk 12:13-17, Lk 20:20-26). This is what Matthew would have been doing in essence, as he was sitting in his tariff/tax booth (Mt 9:9).

So here is Jesus, a celebrity preacher, who some people know is even the Messiah and some of those think as a part of this he will destroy the Superpower and free the occupied territories in Palestine and now Jesus goes and invites himself over to one of the collaborators' places for dinner.

So here Jesus’ adversaries think they see a weakness in Jesus. They think that they can create a scandal that will discredit him and by extension increase their own power and popularity. The general people in Palestine at this time don’t support the occupying forces – they want to be free and some of them want Jesus to free them. So the Pharisees attack. If there were newspapers, internet and the like back then the headline on the 6-O’Clock News would read like verse 11: “Jesus eats with sinners and tax collectors”

It would be like today if someone has a picture of a politician or a famous preacher coming out of a seedy bar or if they have pictures of a person from the Conservative party having secret meeting with the Liberals or something like that. This is potentially a scandal.

Now Jesus –unlike many contemporary politicians- doesn’t deny what he is doing. He is associating with the unfavourable parties in society and he is partying with people who are perceived by some as traitors to his own country. The Pharisees obviously follow him here and have caught Jesus red-handed with these unfavourable people, ‘sinners’ as they call them, and so they attack Jesus’ followers, verse 11: “When the Pharisees saw this, they asked his disciples, ‘Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and 'sinners'?’” Jesus overhears them and instead of running for cover, instead of denying his actions, Verses 12 and 13, “On hearing this, Jesus said, ‘It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’ For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.’”

So this is interesting. Jesus is quoting Hosea 6. The Pharisees would have been very familiar with Hosea 6. Do you remember who the Pharisees are? They know their scriptures. At their best, they are like the holiness teachers of their day. Today we have the more orthodox churches theologically who –like us - do uphold the inerrancy of scripture but some of the apparently theologically orthodox preachers have a tendency to err towards your super-ultra-right-wing Bible belt, holier than thou, prosperity gospel, venom spewing types that want to tell you that you deserve everything that happens to you and they are more than happy to point out to you every sin you commit and how terrible you are for committing it.

The best of the Pharisees are like the good Bible-believing Christians of today, even encouraging us to holiness; the Apostle Paul was a Pharisee (Acts 23:6, 26:5). The worst of the Pharisees however, I imagine, if they were around in today’s day and age you would hear their voices screaming hatred over the radio or intimidating people with signs and mobs as they catch people like Jesus here heading into the seedy places of today to be with ‘sinners’. 
These Pharisees are very careful not to break any religious law and they accuse Jesus (and others one would assume) every time they catch him doing something that they would not think appropriate. I know you know the type. I run into people all the time who say that they don’t come to church any more because some of us can be like this. People tell me all the time that they don’t come to church because they think we Christians are all judgemental hypocrites or they just don`t feel welcome.

This is important. When accused, Jesus says to the Pharisees, Matthew 9:13: “But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.

Now the Pharisees, Jesus’ rivals who we have been pointing out their flaws a little bit here, they were really good at sacrifice. They did rightly believe in holiness. Amongst their number were probably some of the best of the religious people of their day (cf. Acts 22:1-5; Galatians 1:13,14). Maybe even better than us at following the scriptures, they tithed regularly. They read their scriptures. They come to the synagogue (church) regularly. They do not work on the Sabbath and they would certainly never go out for brunch or anything else on the Sabbath because that would cause some poor servant to work (Dt 5; Ex20). They are very careful about taking all that they do seriously and worshiping God by providing the appropriate sacrifices. If they were around today they most likely would always have the Christian radio station tuned into their car and-or their computer; they would always be dressed appropriately and they would be very careful to tithe and offer the appropriate sacrifices.

These are good guys in this regard but they are Jesus’ adversaries and here they are pointing out that Jesus by eating with ‘sinners’ is not like the Pharisees. Jesus agrees that he is not like them and he tells them why: He says the difference is that the Pharisees are not extending mercy. God loves people. The word ‘mercy’ here, ḥesed, means steadfast love or literally ‘covenant love.’ They are accusing Jesus of not being faithful to the covenant with God because he eats with ‘sinners’ but Jesus is saying that he is faithful to God’s covenant precisely because he eats with ‘sinners’ and thus by extension the Pharisees are unfaithful to this covenant love because even though they seem to do everything right, they are not showing mercy. Jesus says, quoting Hosea 6:6: “But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’ For I have not come to call the righteous, but ‘sinners.’

The Pharisees: they did many things right in the eyes of their community. If around today, they certainly wouldn’t have been smokers, or heavy drinkers; they would be embarrassed if they were ever caught speeding, or if they accidentally bounced their cheque to the church but, knowing that all of this stuff is good that they do, Jesus says that is not what is most important. God desires mercy and not sacrifice.

I remember once when I was visiting a good church many, many years ago; a street person came in and lay down on the pews for a nap. A good, self-sacrificing pastor at this time at this church asked him to leave. Jesus says, 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'

I have also seen congregations where nice, good, self-sacrificing church people have sat pouting, arms crossed all through the service because some stranger had dared to come an unwittingly sit in their seat. Jesus says, 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'

I have in my time heard good self-sacrificing church people complain because a teenager showed up in jeans or in other ways not dressed the right way. Jesus says, 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' 

I have in my time heard good self-sacrificing Salvationists help the poor but complain whenever someone needy shows up who doesn`t look poor or who does not seem marginalized. Jesus says, 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' 

I have in my time seen good self-sacrificing Salvationists actually punish people for behaving in ways that are totally consistant with their diagnosis. Jesus says, 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' 

I have heard divorced people tell me that they felt shunned in their churches by the good self-sacrificing Christians after their marriage collapses.  Jesus says, 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' 

I have heard single mothers tell me that they don’t feel welcome in many churches by good, self-sacrificing Christians at all but Jesus says 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’

Well, what about us here today? Do we follow the letter of the law at the expense of the spirit of the law? Do we make nice to some while under the guise of good intentions plot the downfall of others? Do we greet some people but neglect to be hospitable to others? How do we greet the people God brings across our path? Do we extend to them the hesed covenant love of Christ who spent time with them even if they were rich tax collectors removed from everyone else because of their jobs.

Today, like always, I invite us to examine ourselves. Are we like it says in Matthew 23:24, ‘straining a gnat and swallowing a camel’? Are we ‘majoring in the minors’? Or do we openly embrace our brothers and sisters? Do we eagerly look for opportunities to show our love for God by loving our neighbours – rich or poor, nice or mean, scary or not scary? In short, if Christ (or an angel) showed up today in disguise would we welcome him warmly? Would he recognize us as his followers? If there are any ways that we here today have not been open to serving God by showing this hesed, mercy, covenant love to our neighbours, I would ask the Lord to reveal that to us, so that we can turn that and our whole lives over to Jesus Christ and I pray that they will indeed know we are Christians by our love.

I would be remiss if I did not point out that up at the front here we do have the Mercy seat – and any who feel led our more that welcome to come up here for prayer or to commune with God.


May we all today go from here with a renewed impetus to show hesed, mercy, covenant faithfulness to our neighbour and it is my prayer that indeed they will know we are Christians by our love.