Saturday, March 22, 2014

1 Corinthians 1:4-18: Eternal Dividends Over Dividers

Presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, 23 March 2014 by Captain Michael Ramsay
.
Weather from Environment Canada:

Revenue Canada:

Like Rick Mercer, today we are talking about divisions; so I have a little quiz for you:

  1. Who is the best football team?
  1. Who is the best hockey team?
  1. What is the best province in Canada?
  1. What is the second greatest province in Canada?
  1. Coke or Pepsi?
  1. Here’s a divisive one. Don’t answer this one: Conservative, NDP, Green, or Liberal?

My father often sums up any difficulties he had with his sister growing up with their weekly rivalry: Hockey Night in Canada or Lassie.

Divisions can cause serious problems and there are some divisions showing up in the Christian church at Corinth as Paul writes them this letter. Paul eases gently into this topic with the small church. He begins by telling them how much he appreciates them: he thanks God for the grace that has been given them through Jesus. He tells them how he has noticed that Jesus has enriched them in knowledge and in speech, in sharing the testimony of Christ, and in every spiritual gift such as these. He further encourages them that Jesus will continue to strengthen them, reminding them that God is faithful and that God will make all of them holy.

Paul says, in essence, ‘I love you; God is doing these great things in you and God will continue to do great things in and through you – so much so that you will actually be completely blameless by the time Jesus comes back.’ He says, ‘you folks are wonderful but there is one little problem that needs addressing.’[1] Actually it isn’t a little problem; this is more of a big problem so Paul invokes the name and title of Jesus Christ directly in his appeal to them. 1 Corinthians 1:10, “I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought.”

This congregation is doing great but there are divisions in the church. The jar is still holding together but cracks are starting to show and unless those cracks are repaired soon the whole thing will burst, fragmenting the church, breaking it to pieces through the divisions so that nothing they say or do will hold any water, anymore. This is serious. And this is the actual language he is using. The Greek word for divisions in this passage literally means ‘tears’ or ‘cracks’.[2] Paul is warning if this continues the whole church will tear, crack and break apart.

We know how divisions can tear people apart. In the news these days is Ukraine. Ukraine has been in a political association with Russia for 350 years or so now. Ukraine has long been respected by Russia as the birthplace of the Russian people. Khrushchev, a Ukrainian was one of the Soviet Union’s most famous leaders. However, political intrigue, foreign meddling, and espionage in Ukraine have now led to division that a generation ago no one could have possibly foretold. And now some of the great economic and military powers of our world today: The US, Russia, Europe are throwing around rhetoric at such a feverish pitch that world has not heard in a long time. It is even being compared to the language used by the great powers in the build up to the First World War. Lest we forget. Lest we forget. Divisions can break nations apart. Divisions can tear people apart.

It is easy to divide people. Our political system is based on it. I don’t even have TV and I have already seen the Conservative attack ads targeting Justin Trudeau. Our politicians –like the earlier Rick Mercer clip showed- have become better and better with every generation at dividing Canadians. I still remember the attack ads against Ignateiff: ‘Michael Ignatieff: just visiting’, they said. The whole point of this is to divide Canadians and it does. You see those ads and automatically you are polarized. You either believe them, despising their target or you are revolted by the ads and the people that made them: instantly we are divided. Divisions can break nations apart. Divisions can tear people apart.

That is bad enough when it happens in politics; it is terrible when it happens to nations; it can be disastrous when it happens in the churches. As one denomination turns on another, people become angry, then people become apathetic and then people give up on going to church entirely and then people give up on God entirely – walking away from all the blessings of that eternal salvation that was bought for us at such a great price. It is one thing to argue about football. It is another to disagree about politics. It is unacceptable, Paul says, for there to be infighting in the Church. Christ is not divided. Divisions can break churches apart. Divisions can tear people apart.

In Bible study this week we paraphrased 1 Corinthians 1:12-13 like this: “What I mean is that each of you says, “I belong to The Salvation Army”, or “I belong to a Reformed Church (Calvinist, Alliance, Presbyterian)”, or “I belong to the Catholic Church.” Has Christ been divided? Was Martin Luther (John Wesley, John Knox, John Calvin, Ulrich Zwingli, William Booth, Menno Simons, etc.) or even your local pastor (Captain Michael Ramsay) crucified for you? Or were you baptised into the name of your minister (Captain Susan Ramsay) or the person who ‘led you to Christ’?

I think the sins of denominationalism have in no small way contributed to the lower worshipper turnout in the churches especially among the young and the marginalized. We need to be united in our message of hope to the young and we need to be united in our availability to the marginalized. We need to be united in our message. We need to be united in our hope.

But there is more than that. This passage isn’t actually explicitly addressing the sins associated with denominationalism.[3] There is only one Christian church that we know of in the city of Corinth at this time and that church isn’t probably very big. This passage is speaking about divisions in a church probably about the same size as ours. This passage is talking about cliques and this passage is talking about quarrels among its members (1 Corinthians 1:11).

There are many things that we can fight about in the church. I have heard of churches that have been divided over the colour of the choir robes or matters of equally eternal importance. The main thing that Paul is addressing here is that some people are claiming to follow one leader who has come through their local church and maybe saw a few of them baptized. Some claim that they prefer the message of another leader who has probably visited them. Still others claim that they prefer yet another. The leaders aren’t in conflict with each other but the people are.

We know that in the early church there were many people who would travel around preaching and teaching and sharing the gospel. Three really big names have either come to speak to this church in Corinth at different times or else some of its members have heard them speak somewhere else. I imagine then that when people in the church were having disagreements they could then start to say, ‘Well, I heard Cephas say something different than what you are telling me and we know that Cephas is Peter and we know that Peter is the one whom Jesus said he would build his whole church upon’ (Matthew 16:18); to this someone could reply, ‘well I heard the apostle Paul say something different and isn’t Paul the apostle for the Gentiles like us’ (Acts 15:17); and some could say, ‘Well, I knew Apollos personally and he even baptized me and my whole family so whatever I say comes out of a real relationship with a leader.’

People are using the names of the early church leaders in vain and this is making Paul quite angry. Paul says, ‘we are not divided so why are you?’ Paul says, ‘Christ didn’t give some truth for Peter to follow, some for Paul, and some for Apollos’. He asks rhetorically, Verse 13, “Is Christ divided? Was [I], Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in [my name] the name of Paul?” No.

This is important. Paul then goes on to speak about baptism. Paul says, Verses 14-17:
I thank God that I did not baptize any of you except Crispus and Gaius, so no one can say that you were baptized in my name. (Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas; beyond that, I don’t remember if I baptized anyone else.)  For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel—not with wisdom and eloquence, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.

We know what water baptism was used for in the first century, right? It was a common initiation rite (Cf. John 3:22; Acts 2:41, 8:36-38, 16:11-15; 1 Corinthians 15:28-30; see also John 4:1-2, Acts 10:48, and Mark 3, Matthew 3). Like today people will often make pledges or sign pieces of paper; in the eastern Mediterranean world of the first century, people would be baptized. In the Bible we have examples of them using baptism much the same way that evangelicals use the ‘Sinner’s Prayer’ today. You wouldn’t go through classes before you were baptized. Like with Phillip and the Ethiopian eunuch: the moment he accepted Christ he was baptized (Acts 8:26-40). Not only that but in 1 Corinthians here and elsewhere we have examples of people when they come to faith baptizing their entire household – their family, their staff, their live stalk – dedicating it all to the Lord (1 Corinthians 1:16; See also Acts 16:15,33 and 18:8). We even have examples of people being baptized on behalf of those who have already died (1 Corinthians 15:29). We don’t know what this is all about but I presume it relates to recognizing what the Lord has done through people who served God and passed on before they ever heard the Good News of Jesus Christ’s Salvation for the world. Baptism was used as a rite not unlike today’s ‘Sinners Prayer’ when people come to faith.

Now this, you can tell, would often create a bond between the persons who were baptized and the person who baptized them. We often have a bond with the person who ‘leads us to the Lord.’ I know I often think about and pray for those I prayed with as they dedicated their lives to God.

In Corinth, baptism may have been contributing somewhat to the divisions. The Bible says that Jesus, Peter, Paul, and others baptized. They did not make it a part of their regular practice though (Cf. John 3:22, 4:1-2, Acts 2:41, 8:36-38, 10:48), none of them. Paul says here that his main purpose is to share the Gospel rather than to baptize. As others hear it, it is their job to baptize others; it is our job to lead people to the Lord. The Great Commission that Jesus gives us after his return from the dead is for us to baptize people in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost (Matthew 28:18-20) – Not to rally around different leaders who may have baptized one or another of us personally. Jesus doesn’t say to bring people to apostles or priests or pastors to be baptized, he tells us to go forth and baptize everyone in His name because there is only one Christ and there is only one baptism so it doesn’t matter who of us does the baptizing.[4] It doesn’t matter who of us leads people to Christ.

This is why Paul is thankful that he had not baptized many of the members of this church personally: he can honestly say that he hasn’t done something to contribute to their divisions. This is a good reason why Jesus and Peter may have had others baptizing those in the flock: so that people aren’t divided, so that the church is not divided. After all, there really is only one baptism for the Christian and that baptism – no matter who performs the rite – is into the Lord (Ephesians 4:5).

Baptism is good but the enemy used baptism to divide the Corinthians. Baptism contributed to their divisions; what contributes to ours?  What divisions are in our corps? What cracks and tears are threatening to break our congregation? Do some of us disagree about what preachers we have heard on the radio or TV? Do some of us argue about adiaphora, matters of spiritual indifference? Do some of us divide over making dinners or visiting others? Do some of us divide over who is leading a ministry or a night out? Do some of us divide over things like politics or sports or music or other such temporal divisions?

Today I invite us to ask ourselves, is there anything that divides us form our Saviour? Is there anything stopping me from worshipping alongside my neighbour? Is there anything stopping me from serving alongside my neighbour? Is there anything that the enemy can use to cause strife and division within our my own heart and soul, if so we need to hand it to the Lord so that indeed we can have the powerful unified ministry that Christ desires for us.

Let us pray.


---


[1] Cf. Richard B. Hays, 1 Corinthians. Louisville, Kentucky: John Knox Press Press, 1985 (Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Perching), 20-21
[2] Cf. W. Harold Mare, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:1 Corinthians/Exposition of 1 Corinthians/III. The Problem of Divisions in the Church (1:10-17), Book Version: 4.0.2
[3] Cf. Leon Morris, 1 Corinthians: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1985 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 7), S. 45
[4] Cf. J. Paul Sampley, The First Letter to the Corinthians. Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 2002 (NIB X), 807.