Acts 23: 1-11: Punch in the Mouth ('The Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day)

Presented to each the Nipawin and Tisdale Corps 23 September 2007
and the Swift Current Corps on 31 July 2011 and 14 June 2015
by Captain Michael Ramsay

to view the updated version, click here: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2015/06/acts-231-11-punch-in-face-2015.html

There’s a children’s book by Judith Viorst entitled “Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day”[1] Have you ever had one of those days, where it doesn’t matter what you do you just seem to get in trouble? … I remember grade 2.

Now grade two admittedly was not my finest hour. It seemed that I was a permanent member of the detention club. And I remember one day, I just couldn’t win for losing. It was my birthday and many of the grade twos were coming to my party after school so we were told, ‘no dawdling’. We had to be home right after school.

Well, Mrs Leung gave me a detention – and it wasn’t even my fault! You see, Clinton had been chewing gum in school. Now, I hate gum. He gets in trouble for it and he tells Mrs. Leung that he isn’t actually chewing GUM; he is chewing his cheek. She believed him! I thought it was a strange thing to do - chew your cheek so, like any curious 8 year-old, I have to try it and, of course, … And Mrs. Leung catches me and says “Michael no chewing gum” and I say, “I’m not – I’m chewing my cheek” (which I was) and do you think she believes me NOOOO! So I have a detention after school on my birthday and it wasn’t even my fault!

Now, it is my birthday so Mrs. Leung has pity on me and lets me get out at the regular time and this would be fine except two friends of mine in the class – Wade and Clinton – go and get detentions and Mrs. Leung isn’t going to let them go. So sure I get out at the normal time but we all have to wait anyway.

Well, so there we are waiting just INSIDE the exterior door for Wade and Clinton – and now apparently there is a rule that you are not supposed to wait INSIDE the school for anyone – you have to wait OUTSIDE. So guess what? Wade and Clinton finish serving their time and are on their way out of detention hall only to find out that the rest of us our now on our way into detention…so much for getting home on time for my birthday party! But that is not the end of the story either!

You see Wade and Clinton are waiting for the rest of us and guess what? They decide to wait for us INSIDE the school – so guess what…we all wind up spending the first part of my Birthday in detention hall

Well, more than ½ an hour later we all show up for my party…it was just like the children’s book says, “a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.”

In Acts, today, up to and including Chapter 23, you will notice that Paul has been having a little bit of a run like that himself.

In Chapter 16, as we read about last week Paul winds up in detention in Philippi and again in Thessalonica after being attacked by a mob there and again in Berea all in Chapter 17. By Chapter 19 Paul is in the centre of a riot in Ephesus and by Chapter 21 he is now in Jerusalem again and arrested again after being attacked again by still more mobs. Paul really seems to be having “a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad” time of it.

Now Paul is arrested when he is spreading the good news. But it is not the gospel that gets him in trouble with the secular authorities really. They are just trying to keep the peace and save his life. The gospel is getting Paul in trouble with some of the religious leaders.[2] It is they who God delivers Paul from, through the Romans.

Paul is saved[3] but the Romans really have no idea why the religious people want to kill him;[4] so, they keep him under a full, armed guard. He is in the custody of the Superpower of his day[5] and because they do have a vested interest in keeping the peace and because he is a Roman citizen himself, they REALLY want to find out exactly what he has been accused of here; so, they order the Sanhedrin to convene to try to shed some light on the situation.

Now in our text today then, Chapter 23, it opens with this fact-finding hearing with the Sanhedrin and the Sanhedrin (you’ll note from your ‘Sermon Helps’ in the bulletin) is a council of the chief priests of Judaism. They are the Jewish authority.

So with the occupying Roman authorities looking on as official observers, the trial begins. Paul begins. He looks straight at the Sanhedrin (23 vs. 1) in his opening statement and says, “My brothers, I have fulfilled my duty to God in all good conscience to this day.”[6] … and then the High Priest (vs. 2) orders someone to punch him in the mouth. What?

The Romans are asking, ‘what’, too, I’m sure; when I first read this I was asking, ‘what’? So I turned to my reference books and poured through Acts to see if I could find out what Paul said that was so offensive. Yeah… No luck. All I can guess is that they perceived Paul as misrepresenting God in some way here – but that is just a guess – however, we do know that whatever it is, it obviously offends Ananias,[7] the High Priest, so much that he gets someone to punch Paul in the mouth.

Now Paul, as we already said, is apparently not really having a particularly good day and so he does not maintain his usual composure under pressure.[8] He lashes out at the High Priest – this is pretty bold – he says, verse 3, “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck!” and look at what happens after this in verses 4 and 5: Those who are standing near Paul said, “You dare to insult God’s high priest?” Paul replies, “Brothers, I did not realize that he was the high priest; for it is written: ‘Do not speak evil about the ruler of your people.’ (Exodus 22:28; cf. also Hebrews 13:16; Romans 13:1, 5; Titus 3:1)

So… now… this is interesting: Paul says that he doesn’t realize that he is the High Priest. Unlikely, I think. Paul is a Jew. Paul is a Pharisee. Paul is a Roman citizen in Roman custody. Even if the Romans didn’t tell him that he was to be in front of the Sanhedrin, which they probably would, Paul would know where he is and Paul would know that the High Priest usually chairs the Sanhedrin.

It would be like us winding up in front of the Supreme Court of Canada, and looking at the person in the wig and the black robes in front of us and after insulting her saying, “Oh, I didn’t realize that you were the judge. Far be it for me to insult the judge.” I think he knew and I think he is being intentionally sarcastic here.[9]

But, however, when he is reminded of the Priest’s authority, he certainly doesn’t push it any further. Luke is painting a portrait of Paul in Acts as ‘a good Jewish boy,’ and this is what he is conveying at this juncture – that Paul will defer to Ananias’ authority.

Whether he is sarcastic in his approach or not (and he may not be) he certainly ceases insulting authority here when confronted and acknowledges God’s directive (of Exodus 22:28) that we do not speak evil of those in authority over us.[10]

And this I think is important for us.[11] For what do we do when people in authority over us attempt to limit our freedom of religion and in so doing symbolically punch us in the mouth – and let’s not kid ourselves this is happening more and more in our society. I think of when the Swissair flight crashed in the Maritimes not too many years ago.[12] The Jewish, Muslim, and Aboriginal/New Age clergy/spiritualists were all allowed to invoke the name of their supposed deities at the ceremony but the Christians were prohibited from mentioning Christ. This is a punch in the mouth by those in authority over us.[13] More recently during the official Canadian 9/11 ceremonies that religious right of expression was denied again.

I think also of the atheists in central Canada, who have literally been spying on meetings of city counsellors to make sure that they don’t catch anyone praying. If they do, they punch them in the mouth, they call the authorities who enforce the ‘no praying’ legislation.[14]

There has already been talk on parliament hill even – some of you will remember - about deeming the Bible hate-literature.[15] Susan mentioned last week that whenever we see Christians portrayed in the media or by the American (our days’ Superpower) entertainment industry, it seems to be only in a mocking or belittling fashion. And I have heard stories recently and stretching back almost 20 years now, as well, of people standing up for their Christian beliefs and being kicked out of classes or even whole university faculties,[16] or even worse!

I think also personally of my time working in schools in BC. We were told not to mention Christ in the classroom. We were involved in a tutoring outreach to children in Vancouver’s DTES, among other places, and our tutors were told not mention Christ in the public schools and we didn’t….

People, from other faith perspectives, I witnessed myself, are free to mention and even invite children to partake in their traditions in the classroom and secular-atheism certainly does seem to have a privileged spot – more and more so everyday. And with this privilege extending more and more to the secular humanists, like in Ontario, don’t think the atheists won’t drag you before the courts and have you punched in the mouth for disagreeing with their religion.

This persecution is happening - but what can we do about it? Really, what can we do about it? What can we do, particularly when it is from those in authority over us – such as school boards, municipal, provincial, and federal governments? What can we do when the authorities order us to be punched in the mouth? What can we do?

Paul was punched in the mouth. And Paul did not shrink from persecution he declared unequivocally that he is not ashamed of the Gospel (Romans 1:16,17)– He did not avoid persecution at all from even within his own religious community - and don’t be so naïve as to believe that our communities are any more unified or less likely to persecute us than the Sanhedrin of Paul’s day. But here’s the thing… how did he stand up to the persecution? What did Paul do when he was punched in the mouth by those in power? He quoted scripture saying that you should not speak evil of those in authority (vs. 5) and then – after his initial outburst - he did not.

So this is the dilemma isn’t it? I know Christian friends of mine (some who are clergy) who have strong feelings – for instance, as we discussed in the Thursday night Bible study – about such issues as gay marriage, abortion, and the prosperity gospel.[17] And as their religious authorities, their denominations, developed different viewpoints, well I confess that I nodded while they were speaking evil of those in authority over them.

But what did Paul do because his leader ordered him punched in the mouth? This is neat actually. He isn’t distracted by the punch, instead, just like we were reading last Sunday in Adult Sunday School[18] (Acts 16:6-10) – he is listening to God and looking for God’s direction in what to do.[19] He is not looking to his attackers, he is looking to what God is doing and what does he see? Verse 6 – he sees opportunity to be delivered from his persecutors and he sees opportunity to proclaim to Gospel some more. He neither shrinks from persecution nor is he distracted by disobeying those in authority here. He keeps his eyes on Jesus and sees opportunity to proclaim to Gospel.

Look at verse 6, it says:
Then Paul, knowing [or noticing, NRSV] that some of them were Sadducees and the others Pharisees, called out in the Sanhedrin, "My brothers, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee. I stand on trial because of my hope in the resurrection of the dead." [This is true. He stands on trial for just that: proclaiming that Jesus rose from the dead and that He is the Christ for whom we have been waiting] 7When he said this, a dispute broke out between the Pharisees and the Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. 8(The Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, and that there are neither angels nor spirits, but the Pharisees acknowledge them all.)
9There was a great uproar, and some of the teachers of the law who were Pharisees stood up and argued vigorously. "We find nothing wrong with this man," they said. "What if a spirit or an angel has spoken to him?" 10The dispute became so violent that the commander was afraid Paul would be torn to pieces by them. He ordered the troops to go down and take him away from them by force and bring him into the barracks.
Isn’t that neat? God delivers him. Paul keeps his eyes on Jesus. He isn’t distracted by the actions of others. He doesn’t attack the authorities or hide behind his Roman citizenship, which he could. He defers to the Jewish authorities over him and he is delivered by God through the Roman authorities over him. Paul was, like the holy scriptures say we should be, as wise as a serpent and as gentle as a dove (Matthew 10:16). He did not respond to a punch in the mouth with a punch in the mouth (Exodus 21:24, Matthew 5:38). He defers to the authorities and God delivers him AND lets him proclaim the gospel.

And what should we do? Should we mock, malign, and speak evil of our leaders, our bosses, our families, when they punch our beliefs in the mouth? No. We should rather be as wise as serpents and as gentle as doves and look to the Lord and see what we notice.

Back to a story I was telling you earlier. When I was teaching with the Salvation Army in Vancouver schools. We obeyed the authorities. We did not speak evil of those who we felt were persecuting us and we did not mention Christ in the classrooms. We did however build relationships with teachers, parents, and students alike. We did however invite the students to our facilities. We did however get invited into the homes of students and their parents and we did get to present the gospel and we did however see many of them invite Christ into their lives. The Lord is good.

We did not speak evil of those over us. We did not disobey the authorities after their ‘punch in our mouth.’ We were not distracted by them. We kept our eyes on Jesus and we were delivered in order to present the gospel and halleluiah, many of our students were delivered unto salvation.

And it is the same here in Tisdale[20] today, we are servants of the Lord. He knows our predicaments and situations and so then instead of being distracted by and then maligning our attackers –whomever they may be - our leaders, our bosses, our families, –when we are punched in the mouth, we should rather keep our eyes on the Lord and see where he is leading for he will never leave us nor forsake us (Hebrews 13:5). Let us all turn our eyes upon Jesus.

------------
[1] You can read an on-line version at: http://www.kennedy-center.org/programs/family/alexander/
[2] It is they -the religious leaders- who are afraid. It is they who think that he is leading people away from God. It is they that want to stop the spread of the gospel. It is they who are trying to kill him.
[3] And he is not only saved by them but also from them: 22:25 states that he is actually spared a beating by the Romans themselves by identifying himself as a citizen of that Superpower - Rome. Superpowers tend to grant special privileges to there own. Through all this then and the occupying Roman armies save him.
[4] I always find this an interesting parallel to today where in our news countries, who like to think of themselves as religious, are often the most addicted to violence. I also find it interesting that a nation that most of the world considers to be Christian has the highest consumption of violent and pornographic images, the highest percentage of its people behind bars, and among the greatest income disparity between the rich and the poor.
[5] As he was in the custody of the Superpower of his day and he would probably be almost as vulnerable as the people in Guatanamo, Abu Garib and other such terrifying places in our world today - except that he has the foresight to speak up and let them know that he’s one of them.
[6] See 20:18-21, 26-27; 24:16; Rom 15:19b, 23; Philippians 3:6b; 2Tim 4:7 for similarly bold claims made by the Apostle Paul.
[7] Ananias the son of Nedebaeus was as high priest from A.D. 48-58 and was known for his collaboration with the occupying forces, avarice and liberal use of violence. When the rebellion against Rome began in 66, the nationalists burned his house and forced him to flee to the palace of Herod the Great where he was found hiding in an aqueduct and was killed along with his brother Hezekiah (cf. Josephus War II).
[8] Contrast this to what Peter reports about Christ’s actions in front of his accusers (1Pe 2:23) : When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.
[9] Cf. Theodore Zahn, Die Urausgabe der Apostelgeschichte des Lucas [Leipzig: Deichert, 1916], p. 763.
[10] cf. Ecclesiastes 8:1-3; but see also 1 Chronicles 21:6 where Joab does not heed David’s disobedience of God’s command; this is not a matter of denying God, but it is an ethical dilemma that Joab faced concerning obedience to God’s commands versus a godly man’s commands: David after all was a man after God’s own heart, 1 Kings 11:4
[11] The Apostle Paul teaches unequivocally that “it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience” (Romans 13:5) and further that “everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established” (Romans 13:1; see also Titus 3:1).
[12] Cf. The Ethics Centre 2000, 156-158.
[13] Cf. United News 1999, rockies.net/~united/united/articles/ 9810news.html
[14] Sheep Speak Commentary: Christian Persecution (Part 1), Jan 26, 2007.
[15] This was a concern mentioned around a piece of legislation (particularly relating to some of the language around people’s natural objection to certain kinds of sexual expression) from which Svend Robinson garnered a lot of publicity.
[16] I can readily think of two testimonies that I have heard of this – one of a friend of mine in university and the other of a high school student that I just heard word of the other week.
[17] The former two, I think of friends of mine in the Anglican and United traditions. The latter example I think of various members of Canada’s new Conservative party who transferred a billion dollars in tax revenue from the poorest in society to the wealthiest. Cf. Matthew 25:31-46 and see also the NCR’s comments (http://ncrcafe.org/node/1296) which were referred to in the Sheep Speak Commentaries of September 10th and September 20th.
[18] Now those who have been studying the book of Acts along with us will be familiar with the acts of the Holy Spirit and the resurrected Christ to date. We know about all those who have been saved. We remember, from Acts 16, particularly, how Paul, Silas, and Timothy are becoming quite intentional about listening to the Spirit –even to the point where he does not preach in places where God doesn’t want him to do so.
[19] Even after Paul has had his big fight with the other believing Pharisees and then with Barnabus (Acts 15) who was the one who took a chance on Paul when no one else would (Acts 9:27ff). Even after all this, he is listening to God.
[20] Or Nipawin, SwiftCurrent, or wherever you happen to be, I’m sure.

Note: of course the sermon varied somewhat depending on time and place.