Thursday, May 28, 2015

Acts 13:46-48: Welcome to the Kingdom

Presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, 31 May 2015.
By Captain Michael Ramsay

We haven’t had a test in a while. I think that there is some basic perquisite knowledge that would help us understand Acts (especially Chapter 13 which we are looking at today) so I included a test for us in our bulletins today… Let’s take two or three minutes and complete them if we haven’t already and then we will review them

1. Who was Israel? (Jacob)
2. Who was Judah? (Jacob’s 4th oldest son)
3. What was Israel? (Nation)
4. A united Israel had two kings: who were they? (David and Solomon)
5. What happened to Israel after Solomon died? (United Kingdom dissolved)
6. What were the names of the two rival countries descended from Jacob? (Judah and Israel)
7. What was the capital of the Southern Kingdom of Judah? (Jerusalem)
8. In the NT what are descendents of Judah called? (Jews)
9. What was the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel? (Samaria)
10. In the NT what are descendents of Israel called? (Samaritans)[1]
11. There is another ethnicity or two mentioned in Acts and the NT: What is a Gentile?

The word Gentile (sometimes translated Hellenist) means Greek. But the term can also be used more globally to apply to anyone who is neither a Jew nor a Samaritan. Thus the Roman Centurion that we met in Chapters 10 and 11 is referred to as a Gentile. He isn’t Greek but he isn’t Jewish and he isn’t Samaritan so he is referred to as a Gentile by default and these are three of the big categories that we deal with in the book of Acts. There is one more definition we need for today: what is a proselyte? (Religious convert). You may need to keep this as a reference sheet for today’s talk.

Now if you flip over your test sheet, you will see a couple of maps. On one map you can see Judea and Samaria and the city of Jerusalem highlighted. Those of us who were in Bible Study on Monday night looked a little bit at how the Good News of the resurrection of Jesus spread throughout the world: first in the city of Jerusalem, where they are gathered when the Spirit of God sends them out; then to Judea which is the province that the city of Jerusalem is located; and then to Samaria, descendents of the nation of Israel; and then to the Gentiles, the Greeks and everyone else in the world.



Now if you look at the other map. The other map shows you the extent of the Roman Empire of which both Judea and Samaria are a part. It is in this area that the people have more or less easy mobility and we remember from when we were looking at Acts 2: what happened when the Holy Spirit arrived to release them for sharing the Gospel? There were Jews from all over the Roman Empire gathered in Jerusalem for Pentecost and all of these Jews from all over this Roman Empire and beyond heard the Gospel in their own language; so then as all of these people who were in Jerusalem returned home they were able to witness in their own language to everyone at home.

  
Last Sunday we looked at Acts 10 and Cornelius. Does anyone remember last week’s message? What was the significance Cornelius, the Roman Centurion, coming to faith? After the resurrection, he was the first person to become a Christian without first becoming a Jew.

This event, someone becoming a Christian without first becoming a Jew – especially as it relates to Acts 2 – is really significant because it really does change everything. We know that both Jews and Samaritans would gather every Saturday in synagogues to read and discuss scripture. So this is where the Jewish-Christian evangelists would go to share the Good News of Salvation and the commencement of Eternal Life. It is the Jews who were expecting the Messiah and it was the Jews who were expecting a new age (a.k.a. eternal life) when the Messiah would rule and so it is the Jews that one would reasonably expect to understand that that age is now.[2]

So here we have these Christian Jews (the apostles and others) traveling around from synagogue to synagogue and telling the Jews who were living all over the Roman world about how the Messiah has come and ‘eternal life’, the Messianic Age has begun already.[3] This is what it is like when we come to our text today. I will re-read Acts 13:44-50:

44 On the next Sabbath almost the whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord. 45 When the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy. They began to contradict what Paul was saying and heaped abuse on him.
46 Then Paul and Barnabas answered them boldly: “We had to speak the word of God to you first. Since you reject it and do not consider yourselves worthy of eternal life, we now turn to the Gentiles. 47 For this is what the Lord has commanded us: “‘I have made you a light for the Gentiles, that you may bring salvation to the ends of the earth.’”
48 When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed. 49 The word of the Lord spread through the whole region. 50 But the Jewish leaders incited the God-fearing women of high standing and the leading men of the city. They stirred up persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them from their region.

Here the appearance of the Church changes forever. We have a major split among the Jews. Some Jews reject eternal life while others become Christians, serve Jesus and accept eternal life in the Kingdom to Come (cf. Revelation 3:9). Then something else interesting happens in our text. As is the case with Cornelius, whom we looked at last week, so this week we see people who are neither Jews nor proselytes being welcomed into eternal life. Others are being saved too.[4] They are inheriting eternal life, thus proving right Jesus, Matthew 8:11-12, “I say to you that many will come from the east and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven. But the subjects of the kingdom will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” We are all welcome to be a part of Jesus’ Kingdom as long as we serve Him as King. Acts 10:34,35 records: “I truly understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him.”

Paul writes,
·        1 Corinthians 12:13: For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.
·        Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
·        Colossians 3:11: Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all.

And Luke writes, Acts 11:17: “So if God gave them the same gift [of the Spirit] as He gave us, who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to think that I could oppose God?”

Salvation is open to everyone? Are we?

Let us pray.


---


[1] Now both the Samaritans and Jews claimed a certain racial purity but the Bible is clear that that is not necessarily true for either group. The Jews were very clear about what they think of the Samaritans and we need look no further than the Moabites, Canaanites, Hittites, Chaldeans and others in the lineage of the Jewish Messiah himself to disprove their claim to racial superiority through ethnic purity.
[2] N.T. Wright, Acts for Everyone Part 2 (Louisville, Kentucky, USA: WJK, 2004), 20
[3] cf. Richard N. Longenecker, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Acts/Exposition of Acts/Part II. The Christian Mission to the Gentile World (12:25-28:31)/Panel 4-The First Missionary Journey
[4] Marshall, I. Howard: Acts: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 1980 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 5), S. 244: “the task of Israel, which she failed to carry out, has passed to Jesus and then to his people as the new Israel; it is the task of bringing the light of revelation and salvation to all the peoples of the world (cf. the clear allusion to Isa. 49:6 in Luke 2:29–32

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Week 35: Acts 11:17: Acceptance

A devotional thought presented originally to Swift Current Men’s Prayer Breakfast, Thursday 28 May 2014

Read Acts 11:12-17

Peter, who is not only a good synagogue-going person but also a devout follower of Jesus, has a dream. One day he dreams of all these foods he is not supposed to eat - now I am not talking about chocolate or cake or things that were bad for his diet. I am talking about things that in his day good people who followed God wouldn't touch because they were good, God-following people.

Peter has this vision: the Lord asks him three times to eat this food. Now Peter isn't daft and he, not long ago, has already been caught denying Jesus three times and so he is not going racing to any rash decisions; he shows the Lord that he is faithful to his Jewish covenant and declines the invitation three times. This is not what is wanted here though and this is not what the dream, it turns out, is even about.

This passage is not about dietary laws and what foods a good follower of Jesus will or will not eat and Peter should know this because he was there when Jesus fulfilled/abolished the dietary laws by declaring all foods clean (Mark 7:19). Peter knows this is true that he should not call anything impure that God has made. He catches on that there is something else here.

What the resurrected Jesus is talking about is something much more profound than diets. Jesus is discussing the salvation and role of Gentiles. Jews had not thought to this point that Gentiles, as they were, could be saved. They knew that salvation was possible for Gentiles; Ancient Israel always had proselytes. There were always people converting to YHWH-worship but here in Cornelius' household, we have God-fearing people who are not like the regular synagogue-goers. They are different.

Up to this point, Gentiles who converted to worship YHWH, all started to dress like Jews, pray like Jews, talk like Jews, eat like Jews and the men were even circumcised like Jews - they joined in the worship of YHWH by becoming Jews.

Now something is different. There are people who do not eat like them, do not look like them, do not act like them and who are already in a relationship with God. How can this be? They don't dress like Jews, pray like Jews, talk like Jews, eat like Jews, and the men aren't even circumcised like Jews and yet they have already received the gift of repentance through the Holy Spirit. God saved the Gentiles without the Gentiles having to become like the good synagogue/ church-going people.

My question for us today: who are these 'Gentiles' in our society that don't dress like us, pray like us, talk like us, eat like us, and otherwise act like us and do we accept them? How do we ensure that we are following God's Spirit in extending His mission to everyone as is commanded in Peter's dream?




[1] Based on the devotional by Captain Michael Ramsay, Acts 10-11: Chocolate Cake.  Presented to TSA Nipawin Leadership Team and Tisdale Corps Council meetings on the week of September 2,2007. On-line: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2007/09/acts-10-chocolate-cake-devotional.html

Friday, May 22, 2015

Acts 10:34,35: Impartiality of God

Presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army, 02 June 2013 and May 24, 2015 by Captain Michael Ramsay

This is the 2015 message. To read the 2013 homily click here: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2013/06/acts-101-1118-its-all-in-who-you-know.html

Acts 10 is considered a very important chapter in the NT because it is understood to be the place where the Good News of Salvation is brought to Non-Jewish Gentiles for the first time. Peter is recorded as declaring in Acts 10:34-35, “I truly understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him.”

In Acts 10:1-8 the reader is introduced to the Roman, Cornelius, and his vision from God. Cornelius is not only a foreigner but also a commander of the occupying military forces. Historically, the Romans were known to tolerate foreign religions and even invoke the names of regional deities before they attacked a city; [1] however, it is quite another thing for a centurion to be “a devout man who feared God with all his household; he gave alms generously to the people and prayed constantly to God” (Acts 10:2). Acts 10 is often called the place where the Gospel is given to the Gentiles. This brings us to our first question: Is this true?

1)      Does Acts 10 really recall the first time that the Gospel of Salvation is shared with the [non-Jewish] Gentiles?

1a) What about the Gentiles of Chapter 6?

Acts 6, which we looked at in our Boundless readings last week, records that there was a dispute where “the Grecian or Hellenists [Christians] complained against the Hebrews [Christians] because their widows were being neglected in the daily distribution of food” (Acts 6:1). Do you know what the words 'Grecian' or 'Hellenist' (depending on your Bible translation) mean? Both words mean 'Greek' and 'Greek' is just another word for ‘Gentile’. Gentile, Grecian, Hellenist, and Greek all can mean exactly the same thing.

So how can this be? How can Acts 10 be considered the first time the Gospel is brought to the Gentiles when Gentiles/Hellenist Christians were already mentioned in Acts 6? Some academics have suggested that the Hellenist or Gentile believers referred to in Acts 6 may not have really been Gentiles.[2] This would explain why some translators have translated the word 'Grecian' or ‘Hellenist’ rather than ‘Gentile’ in Chapter 6.  These Hellenists, Gentiles, or Greeks in Chapter 6 may not actually have been of Greek blood. They may have been people of Jewish ethnicity who were simply born abroad. This may be why they are called Hellenists rather than Gentiles or Jews in Chapter 6.

This would be like if we -Susan, the girls and I- were posted to Germany when Heather was born, she would probably speak more German than we do; by now she would certainly act more like a German 4 year-old than a Canadian 4 year-old. She, however, would not be allowed to obtain German citizenship. She would be a Canadian citizen even though everything about her would appear to be German. And Canadian children, if we moved to Canada when she starts kindergarten in the fall, would most likely refer to her as German even though she would not be German, she would be Canadian (because she would speak German and act German). This could be the situation in Acts 6. It certainly is one possible explanation for why there are apparent Gentiles in the church in Chapter 6 but Chapter 10 is said to be the first time the Gospel is brought to the Gentiles. They look, speak, and live like Gentiles in the Gentile world but they may in fact actually be ethnic Jews living in a Gentile part of the world rather than ethnic Gentiles. Does this make sense? So, what is a Hellenist?

1b) What about the Ethiopian of Chapter 8?

This may be so. But even if it is, this still doesn’t entirely solve our problem because, as you were reading along in your Boundless readings this week, you no doubt have noticed that after Chapter 6 and before Chapter 10 there is yet another time when the Gospel appears to come to the Gentiles.

In Chapter 8 Verse 27 we meet the Ethiopian eunuch, a court official of the queen of the Ethiopians. This Ethiopian in Acts 8 receives the Gospel and becomes a Christian, so how can Acts 10 be the first time the Gospel is received by Gentiles?  Could this Ethiopian we meet in Chapter 8 not be a Gentile? Might he really be a Jew? The fact that “he had come to Jerusalem to worship and was returning home; seated in his chariot, [and] he was reading the prophet Isaiah,” Acts 8:27-28, would indicate that he was at least a practitioner of the ancient Israelite faith even if not of the Jewish race [3] (cf. Acts 6:5); so is this Ethiopian a proselyte?

First, before we can answer that question, who can tell me what is a ‘proselyte’? (Gentile convert to the Israelite religion) And what did we say a Hellenist probably is? (Judean born abroad). So like the Hellenists are mostly probably ethnic Jews born abroad, the Ethiopian proselyte here is likely someone who wasn't born a Jew but was later circumcised as he converted to the Jews’ religion.

This brings us back to our main question: is Chapter 10 the first time the good news is accepted by Gentiles? How are these Hellenist Christians of Chapter 6 and the proselyte Christian of Chapter 8 different from the Gentile Christians of Acts 10? The main difference is that before the Hellenists of Chapter 6 became Christians, they were Jews (they were Jews who were born abroad); before the foreign-born proselyte of Chapter 8 accepted Christ, he had probably already converted to the religion of the Jews. So then Chapter 10 here with Cornelius would be considered the first time the Gospel was brought to the non-Jewish Gentiles because Cornelius was not born a Jew and he probably had not previously converted to a Jewish religion: he may have been the first person to go straight to being a Christian (serving Jesus as his Lord) without first becoming a Jew. Does this make sense?

 1c) Was Cornelius a Jewish proselyte?

But is this so? Was Centurion Cornelius the first Gentile convert straight to Christianity or was he already proselyte like the Ethiopian? Peter doesn’t treat him as a Jewish proselyte (cf. Acts 10:22, 28) and although Luke refers to him as “God-fearing” [4] it would seem that he was what we would consider a friend or an adherent. That would be like in The Salvation Army the difference between a soldier and an adherent. A solider doesn't drink or smoke and is allowed to wear a uniform but an adherent isn't. A Jewish soldier, proselyte, convert, likewise would be circumcised but an adherent wouldn't. Does that make sense? Accepting that the Ethiopian was a proselyte, the very fact that Luke did not portray Philip as having the same aversion to the Ethiopian as Peter did to the Roman Centurion leads us to the conclusion that Cornelius falls into a separate category from the Ethiopian. He probably was neither a Jew nor a proselyte; he was likely an adherent to the ancient Israelite faith and he was probably the first person to convert to Christianity without becoming a Jew. So this raises a couple of more questions that will have undoubtedly raced to your mind as you were reading through Acts this week.

2)      Do Gentiles who accept Christ need to follow Jewish rules?

Now, in Acts 10 it is recorded that Peter saw “the heavens opened and something like a large sheet coming down, being lowered to the ground by its four corners” (Acts 10:11) and in the sheet were all kinds of unclean animals; Peter was commanded, “Get up, Peter; kill and eat.” (Acts 10:13). There are a number of things that are notable about this section. One is that God commands Peter to get up, kill, and eat. Jews are not supposed to eat those things and the dietary laws are not trivial to Jews: they are a matter of survival and identity” [5] and here Peter is told to totally disregard them.

From this Peter declares, “God has shown me that I should not call anyone profane or unclean” (Acts 10:28). It has been interpreted as the great revelation to Peter that the Gentiles are to be brought into community. It was decided following this event and after much discussion that the Gentile Christians do not need to follow all of the Jewish practices. Acts 15:7-10: “After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, ‘My brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that I should be the one through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the good news and become believers. And God, who knows the human heart, testified to them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as he did to us; and in cleansing their hearts by faith he has made no distinction between them and us. Now therefore why are you putting God to the test by placing on the neck of the disciples a yoke that neither our ancestors nor we have been able to bear.’”  James, Acts 15:19-20, then with stipulations, concurs “…we should not trouble those Gentiles who are turning to God, but we should write to them to abstain only from things polluted by idols and from fornication and from whatever has been strangled and from blood.” So do Gentiles who accept Christ need to follow Jewish rules? No. Christian Gentiles don’t need to – and really should not – follow Jewish rules but that brings us to another question:

3)      Do Christian Jews need to follow Jewish rules?

We remember, Mark 7:19, that even prior to Peter’s vision, Jesus had already abolished the food laws. No doubt Peter was present when Jesus insisted that it is not what goes into someone’s stomach that defiles them but what comes out of one’s heart. [7] Jesus, Mark records, at that time declared all foods clean” (Mark 7:19). Jesus abolished the dietary Laws. So then do Christian Jews need to follow Jewish rituals? No! The NT is very clear that they do not and Paul even suggests in Galatians 3-5 that if they do than they are not Christians. Christians do not and should not follow the tradition of the Jewish Law.

Let's review our questions of today.
1)      Does this pericope, Acts 10, recall the first time that the Gospel (Good News of Salvation) is accepted by the non-Jewish Gentiles? Yes. It is very likely the first time Gentiles became Christians without also first becoming Jews.
2)      Do Gentile Christians need to follow Jewish rules? No.
3)      Do Jewish Christians need to follow Jewish rules? No.

4)      What does this all mean to us today?

Of primary significance to this passage seems to be God’s plan to allow Gentiles to experience the blessing of salvation without first becoming circumcised Jews (cf. 10:44; 11:15-18; 15:8-11).[8] God dealt equally directly with Peter, a Jew, and Cornelius, a Gentile. The Good News is to be brought to the Gentiles and everyone and, as Peter states, “We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are” (Acts 15:11) for “I truly understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him” (Acts 10:34-35). There is no difference between Jews and Gentiles. In layman’s terms, if Jews love God and therefore become Christians they ‘go to heaven’; if not, they don’t. And if Gentiles love God and become Christians they ‘go to heaven’; if not, they don’t (TSA Doc 11) and if you and I love Christ than we will spend eternity with him. This is the Good News, Romans 10:13: anyone who calls on the Name of the Lord will be saved.

So today if you haven't yet, I invite you to call on the name of the Lord and be saved. If there is anything preventing you from entering into a holy relationship with Jesus Christ our Saviour, if there is I would invite you to leave those with God now at the Mercy Seat.

---

[1] Will Durant, Caesar and Christ. (TSC 3: New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1944), p. 522.
[2] John T. Squires, “Acts.” in Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. (ed. by James D.G. Dunn and John W. Rogerson. Grand Rapids, Michigan; William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2003), p. 1235.
[3] Robert W. Wall, ‘Acts’ The New Interpreter’s Bible 10, (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 2002), p. 162.
[4] Robert W. Wall, ‘Acts’ The New Interpreter’s Bible 10, (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 2002), p. 162.
[5] William H. William, ‘Acts’, Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, (Atlanta, Georgia: John Knox Press, 1988), p. 96.
[6] William Neil, The Acts of the Apostles. (TNBC: Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1981), p. 138.
[7] Fredrick Frye Bruce, The Book of Acts. (TNICNT: Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988), 206
[8] Robert W. Wall, ‘Acts’ The New Interpreter’s Bible 10, (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 2002), p. 160.

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Week 34: Revelation 3:20: Trust

A devotional thought presented originally to Swift Current Men’s Prayer Breakfast, Thursday 21 May 2015

Read Revelation 3:15-21

The church in Laodicea receives the most negative letter recorded in Revelation. These are Christians Jesus is talking about spewing from Him forever. What is the sin of the Laodiceans? They are rich but they are poor. This is not unlike our nation today. We know that one cannot serve both God and money and as we have grown richer in this country, complacency, crime, pornography, atheism, and self-reliance have sprung up like weeds attempting to choke out the Word of God. Like Laodicea, as we have grown complacent, trusting in our earthly riches, our country is turning further from God.

Laodicea was rich but Laodicea lacked the good water of her neighbouring cities: Hieropolis had great hot mineral springs and Colossae had wonderful clear, cold water. Laodicea’s water was lukewarm by the time it was piped in through its aqueducts. Laodicea was rich in money but poor in the water it needed to survive. Likewise, Laodicea was rich in temporal wealth but poor in living water, which we all need to survive. If only Laodicea was as hot as the waters of Hieropolis or as cool and refreshing as the waters of Colossae! (Important: This passage is NOT referring to ‘spiritual hotness’ as a good thing versus ‘spiritual coldness’ as a bad thing. That was a foreign analogy in the first century!)

This is what John is talking about: The Christians in Loadicea have material wealth but they lack spiritual wealth. They have both the good hot water and the good cold water being poured into them but when they mix together in their wealthy city this becomes useless lukewarm water. This is our nation too but there is good news. Jesus says: “… be earnest, and repent. Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with him, and he with me. To him who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne…”

Even in this state of wallowing in their riches while people in their world starve to death; even in our state of wallowing in our riches while people in our world starve to death; even in this state of not having spiritual strength equivalent to the hot springs of Hieropolis or the religious zeal equivalent to the clear, cold waters of Colossae, God does not give up on them. He does not give up on us. Jesus stands at the door and knocks. It isn’t a casual knocking at the door and seeing that the Laodiceans are too busy to hear him, he goes away – this is a persistent knock. The Greek word here refers to a fervent, continual knocking.

And so it is with us today. He is knocking at our door right now. The question is, will we shut Jesus out and so be spewed from Him or will we trust Jesus, let Him in and sit with Him as He reigns forever?





[1] Based on the sermon by Captain Michael Ramsay, Revelation 3:20: Hello, is anybody in there? Presented to Swift Current Salvation Army, 30 August 2009. On-line:  http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2009/08/revelation-320-hello-is-anybody-in.html

Friday, May 15, 2015

Acts 2: Scene 1

Presented to each the Nipawin and Tisdale Corps 12 August 2007, Swift Current Corps 23 May 2010 and 17 May 2015, Corps 614 Regent Park Toronto 04 October 2015 and Alberni Valley Ministries, 12 June 2022 by Captain Michael Ramsay

This is the 2015 text. For the original August 2007 version, click here: http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2007/08/acts-2-act-ii-scene-1.html

For those of us following along in our Boundless Bible Reading Challenge we are looking at the Book of Acts right now. Acts is a neat book. Did you know that it is the only history in the NT? Luke and Acts also were written by the same author and these books actually come together as sort of a two volume set that many scholars like to call ‘Luke-Acts.’ Together this set comprises more than 30% of the NT. Luke-Acts is thus important for us to understand.

Acts always reminds me of a play. Maybe it’s the name (Act 1, scene 2). But particularly in the first part, Acts reminds me of a Shakespearian play. Anyone remember studying Shakespeare in school?

All right, here’s a quiz for you. Who can name the play these quotes are from:

1)      ‘Friends, Romans, countrymen lend me your ears;’
2)      “to be or not to be, that is the question” – here’s an easy one –
3)      “Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo”? [Answers below]

Shakespeare wrote very dramatic plays and some of the tragedies are pretty tragic like Hamlet. Remember, his ‘to be or not to be’ speech where, of course, he is either pretending to be insane or actually goes insane, while trying catch his father’s killer who happens to be his uncle and is also married to his mother. (Sounds like a soap opera actually) And in the end - everybody dies…

Or on a happier note, there is Romeo and Juliet. Young love. But their parents object so they sneak around for a while and then eventually (pause) kill themselves…okay so not a lot of happy endings…but they are very dramatic and neat stories nonetheless.

Shakespeare was a master playwright. And Acts reminds me of Shakespeare’s work, only better! God uses Luke to communicate the VERY dramatic REAL events that happen here and Luke attributes to Peter some amazing speeches that could cause the post-modern reader to recall Mark Anthony, Lady Macbeth, or Hamlet.

And he uses the scenes and speeches that we will look at today to tell the readers how God’s Spirit comes at Pentecost and releases the disciples to proclaim the gospel of Jesus’ death, resurrection and the forgiveness of sins.

As the curtains open on Acts 1’s scene one. The narrator recaps the miracles of the end of Luke (1:1-5) and the resurrection. He explains Jesus’ ascension to heaven (1:6-12) and we now are invited to watch as the disciples, men and women alike (1:14), gather around in the upper room (1:13) casting lots to learn who God has chosen in place of Judas Iscariot; the gruesome details of whose death unfold for the audience as the protagonist, the Apostle Peter [1] takes to the stage with this opening address (vs. 15-20):

"He was one of our number and shared in this ministry.” With the reward he got for his wickedness, Judas bought a field; there he fell headlong, his body burst open and all his intestines spilled out. Everyone in Jerusalem heard about this, so they called that field in their language, Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood.

Peter - in his address - shows how Judas’ death fulfils the scriptures of Psalms 69:25 and 109:8.[2] And then as he finishes speaking, the stage fades to black, ending Acts 1.

Now just before we open the curtain on Acts 2, you should know a bit about the way the stage is set. When the curtain comes up not only will all the disciples still be together. But also in the scene will be ‘Jews from every nation under heaven (2:5)’ and they have come to celebrate Pentecost.[3]

These Jews on the scene in Acts II here are very familiar with the tradition of the Messiah because they have been looking for someone to deliver Palestine from the evils of the occupation. They have been looking for someone who could offer them freedom for Judea. They have been looking for someone who can provide salvation for the Judeans (cf. psalm 72, 2 Samuel 9). They have been looking for the Messiah, the Christ, the Saviour of Israel. It is upon this crowd that we gaze as the curtain rises on scene one in Acts II:

When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place. Suddenly a sound like the blowing [sound effects] of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. They saw what seemed to be (pillars) tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other languages as the Spirit enabled them.

Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. Utterly amazed, they asked: “Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans? Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language?

And this is the dramatic scene in the opening of Acts 2. And if this were a Shakespearean play, now, hundreds of years later, there would be - Cole’s Notes! - so that we can all understand the nuances of what is happening before us and there are many nuances…

If we had our Cole’s Notes with us today there would probably be an asterisk beside the word ‘Pentecost’ (vs. 1) because when we think of Pentecost we usually think of this very moment: the arrival of the Holy Spirit in Acts – but it is more than that.

Your Cole’s Notes would probably say that Pentecost is also known by various other names: feast of weeks (Ex 34:22; Dt 15:10, 16:9-12; Nu 28:26-31), feast of harvest (Ex 23:16), day of first fruits (Exod 34:22; Nu 28:26; Lev 23:9-14) and this is neat: Pentecost occurs on the 50th day after the Sabbath Passover (Ex 19:1)[4] and here, in Acts II, it is about 50 days after Jesus was crucified.

Now this Jewish festival [5], Pentecost, is a time to celebrate God giving the Law to Moses on Mt Sinai:[6] Remember the Ten Commandments and how Moses climbs the Mountain (twice; Ex 19-20, 31, 34; Dt 4-5, 10) and God writes the 10 commandments on the stone tablets[7] with his very own finger (Ex 31:18; Dt 4:13, 10:1) and when Moses returns from the Mountain his face is literally radiant (34:29-35): it’s shining.

In our text it is now about 50 days after Jesus was crucified.[8] And as Pentecost is about the Ten Commandments, the covenant and an empowering of the Israelites for their new life outside of Egypt[9], here now with the coming of the Spirit in Acts II the disciples are empowered for their new life in the Kingdom of God (Lk 24:49).[10]

This event certainly does link Jesus to Moses as a deliver of his people – and those present in this scene are probably beginning to understand that Jesus is that deliverer.

There is even more though for the curious reader here to link Jesus to Moses (verse 3): the tongues or pillars of fire above their heads. Remember as God was leading Israel away from Pharaoh’s Army, He parted the Red Sea for them. Remember as He led them around the desert for that generation (Ex 23:21, 33:14; Dt 4:7) what did God lead them with? …: A pillar of cloud by day and a pillar (or tongue) of fire by night. And here we have pillars of fire linking our minds again to Israel’s delivery and Israel’s covenant with God. There is even more when the Bible speaks about the coming baptism of fire. Here it is [11]; isn’t that neat?

And even more – you see the Bible is REAL. These things really did happen but it is also a literary masterpiece with symbolism everywhere –would we expect anything less from God’s own Word?

Look at 2:6: “each one heard them speaking in his own language;” some have compared this to an un-doing, as it were, of the tower of Babel (Gen 11:1-9). Do you remember that story? The people provoke God through staying to build this tower and as a result, all of a sudden they are babbling in different languages. God confuses their talk. It is kind of hard to work together when you don’t understand what other people are saying – but now what happens? In Acts II, it is reversed. Instead of language being confused, people can actually now hear the Gospel proclaimed in their OWN language. And they are again to go and fill the earth, this time with the Good News of Christ.

Further, some people even relate this event again to the giving of the Law at Sinai as, according to Jewish tradition, at that point every people heard the law in its own language.[12]

And now certainly we, as well as the much earlier readers of Acts, can understand the implicit symbolism representing the truth that Jesus, like Moses, is deliverer of his people[13] - and actually he is the one they have been waiting for.

But more than that: Your Cole’s notes would probably also have an asterisk beside the words ‘the violent wind’ [14] in Verse 2 where it says, “Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting” The passage does not claim that the Holy Spirit is a wind; rather the Holy Spirit is like the sound wind makes but, this is neat, the word here for wind is the SAME word for Spirit in the original Greek (cf. Gen 1:2; Ez 37:9, 14; Jn 3:8) so the SPIRIT (or wind) is coming like the WIND (or spirit) and this same play on words occurs in the creation story of Gen 1:2[15] where it says that the Spirit (or wind) of God hovered there - over the waters. This passage is about a beginning, a creation, a new Kingdom, if you like, and Jesus here is not only linked to man, he is also linked to God. This very real act of the Spirit coming on Pentecost unites the symbolism of the Messiah and of God himself [16].

So lets recap: they are all together in one place. The Spirit blows in, sound like a violent wind, tongues of fire are settling on people -- Now lets join the scene in Acts 2:17: the Apostle Peter stands up with the 11 (2:14) to make his speech (Acts 2:17-21) in which he quotes the Prophet Joel (Joel 2:28-32) [and Psalm 16:8-10]:

In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams. Even on my servants, both men and women, I will pour out my Spirit in those days, and they will prophesy. (It will be) the coming of the great and glorious Day of the Lord. And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.

As if in a Shakespearian soliloquy, Luke records here what Peter explains from Scriptures. He explains exactly what we can see unfolding the scene before us. He explains that Jesus is from God and Jesus is Lord [17] and he explains that ‘everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’

And in case we missed it still Peter says from Verse 22 onwards – Jesus was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs…and now, if not before, now people get it and so Peter turns to the common everyday people listening and says: Jesus was accredited by God and you … Verse 23… you and wicked men put him to death by nailing him to the cross. You killed him.

This is tragic. This is as tragic as any play. The people get it now that Jesus was the Messiah (and Peter goes on about it more in the rest of the chapter). They get it. He was the one who was supposed to deliver them. He was the one who was supposed to save them. He was the one who was supposed to lead them into the Kingdom to come. But there is one problem: he died. And not only that, ‘you’, Peter says, ‘you killed him.’

Can you imagine the sorrow, the guilt, the pain? It must be like Romeo and Juliet’s parents: they loved their children with everything in them. They pinned their future hopes on their children and now because of their actions, their un-forgiveness, their very loved children are dead.

Jesus was to be our deliver, Peter says, and you killed him. You wanted a deliver. You had a deliver and you killed him! But there’s more. Peter makes it clear to us that ‘you’ killed the Messiah but he also makes it clear (vs.22-23) that he ‘was handed over to you by God’s set purpose and foreknowledge;’ He was ‘accredited by God with miracles, wonders and signs which God did.’ And, Verse 24, God raised him from the dead. Jesus is inextricably linked to God and you killed Him and he was raised from the dead.
This not necessarily understood as good news yet for those listening [18] - The Judeans know that God is just. And so this could be a little scary really. They here are waiting for their deserved penalty for killing their Messiah [19] and remember they already saw what happened to Judas after he betrayed Christ (Acts 1:16-20).

This is a part of the world and understanding of the Jews. They understand that there is a punishment for sin. [20] They understand that there is a penalty for killing Jesus, whom those here –from what we’ve examined today – are rightly convinced is Messiah.

These people are now standing in front of Peter – like repentant children in front of the principal, realising that they’ve done something terribly wrong, hoping against hope to somehow make it right and maybe even avoid their punishment (cf. Jn 21:15ff.): Verse 37, “When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?””

What can we do? We killed Jesus. We killed our Messiah. We killed God’s son. He died for our sins. He’s now raised from the dead. Is there anything we can do to be forgiven by Him and by God and be accepted into His Kingdom?

Peter says, Verse 38, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins.” Now this is significant. You see, as we looked at in Luke, Jesus is ushering in this Kingdom of God. And earlier in this chapter we saw the Spirit of God himself come down from Heaven (Acts 2:1-4, Lk 24). We saw the power of God manifest to announced the Kingdom of God is coming now; it is here.

And what does this Kingdom look like? It is a Kingdom of forgiveness. It is a Kingdom –like the Lord’s Prayer says - where we forgive those who do things against us and God forgives us what we have done – even our sending [as was his purpose and with God’s perfect foreknowledge (vss. 22-23)] God’s own son to die on the cross.
What is it that one must do to be a part of this Kingdom? We just have to repent (This doesn’t just mean change your way of acting – it means change your whole way of thinking) – You must repent – you must now believe that Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead and Jesus is Lord. You must believe and be baptised (which here is an initiation ceremony); you must be initiated into the Kingdom of Forgiveness of Sins and the Kingdom of God, in the name of Jesus – and that’s it. [21]

Peter says then “you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” This same Holy Spirit that came down on Pentecost and even more than that he assures us that this promise isn’t just for them. “The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off —for all whom the Lord our God will call.” And, like we read earlier, “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved”

And look what it says, just before the curtain closes on our scene here. It says in verse 47 “day by day the Lord added to their number those being saved.” And may it be continue to be so. Come and pray for the Spirit in our lives.

Benediction: Galatians 5:22-26a.


---
ANSWERS TO THE QUIZ
‘Friends, Romans, countrymen lend me your ears;’ - Mark Anthony in 'Julius Caesar'
“to be or not to be, that is the question” – Hamlet in 'Hamlet'
“Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo”? - Juliet in 'Romeo and Juliet'
_______________________________________________________

[1] After Acts 15, Paul becomes the central apostle, whose acts we are following.
[2] “For,” said Peter, “it is written in the book of Psalms, “ ‘May his place be deserted; let there be no one to dwell in it,’ (Psalm 69:25) and, “‘May another take his place of leadership’ (Psalm 109:8).
[3] These Jews are probably members of the Diaspora: shortly after Jesus died, there was an unsuccessful Jewish rebellion (68-73 CE) against the Romans [which led to the destruction of the temple (70 CE).] As a result, many Judeans had to flee for their lives. This dispersion was throughout the Mediterranean world and these dispersed Jews are members of the now commonly called Diaspora. However, “We have seen that this Dispersion had [actually] begun six centuries before in the Babylonian Captivity, and had been renewed in the settling of Alexandria.” Will Durant, Caesar and Christ. (TSC 3: New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1944), 545. Those present here would be from the earlier group as Acts is set before the destruction of the temple and some even argue that the scene in Acts 2 actually takes place in the temple.
[4] Thus the name Pentecost from the Hebrew he pentekoste "fiftieth"
[5] There is much discussion about whether or not Luke was making specific reference to this event at the time of his writing; regardless of whether this was an intentional parallel drawn by the author of Luke, the symbolism seems to be divinely intentioned. Cf. Robert W. Wall, Acts. (NIB 10: Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 2002), 57-58, for a thorough discussion of this.
[6] This continues to this day. Also cf. R.C.H Lenski, The Interpretation of the Acts of the Apostles. (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Augsburg Publishing House, 1961), 57.
[7] The first time (Exod. 31:18); The second time, according to the Exodus account, Moses is required to do the writing himself (Exod. 34:1; but cf. Dt. 10:1)
[8] In John’s narrative (John 20:19-23), The disciples receive the gift of the Holy Spirit before Jesus has gone to ‘his Father’s house.’ This may be a different record of the same event; however, it may not. This appearance of the Holy Spirit is not an act unique to Acts II.
[9] Robert W. Wall, p. 54. : [Some] interpreters posit a new dispensation has dawned when the Holy Spirit through the Messiah mediates a new covenant. (cf. Jer. 31:31-34; Rom. 8:2).
[10] Cf. Willimon, p. 28.
[11] These tongues are also an obvious fulfilment of Luke 3:16: ‘He shall baptise you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.’” They may however also represent the altar with its holy fire. Fire is also a symbol of purity and purification, cf. also Lenski, p. 59.
[12] Fredrick Frye Bruce, The Book of Acts. (TNICNT: Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988), 54.
[13] Certainly readers of Matthew would understand this, as one of the themes of Matthew is that Jesus is ‘the new Moses.’
[14] Jesus himself compares the coming of the Spirit to the wind, see John 3:8.
[15] R.C.H Lenski, p. 58: “This mighty sound was surely a symbol of power, and we may recall that both the Hebrew and the Greek words for Spirit, Ruach and IIamven denote wind or breath.” Some also suggest that the ‘whole house’ referred to in this verse here may actually be an allusion to the Temple, which was destroyed in 70 AD.
[16] See John 3:8 where Jesus himself compared the coming of the Spirit to the blowing of the wind.
[17] It is significant here, I believe, that Luke quoted the Greek text. He was able to thus make a strong intentional link then with the word ‘Lord’.
[18] This is reminiscent of Jesus’ appearance to Peter right after Peter had denied him and he was crucified.
[19] Cf. Robert W. Wall. pp. 66-67.
[20] Cf. NT Wright, The Problem of Evil and the Justice of God.
[21] Ibid.

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Week 33: Luke 2:26: Present

A devotional thought presented originally to Swift Current Men’s Prayer Breakfast, Thursday 14 May 2015. Presented to River Street Cafe, 11 December 2015.

Read Luke 2:25-29

One day when my oldest daughter was in elementary school, she shared with us a story called something like ‘Harold and Harold.’

There is a family. The father is a fisherman. They live by an area of the ocean that can be treacherous in a storm, near a place called Ledgy Island.

One day – as I understand the story– a young boy named Harold and his pet parrot, who is also named Harold, get up early. The boy Harold goes to play in the attic and the parrot Harold flies to the dangerous Ledgy Island. As the other members of the family wake up and get going for the day someone calls out, “where’s Harold?” and the voice from the attic replies, “on Ledgy Island.”

The parents start to panic. There is a storm brewing and Ledgy Island is a very dangerous place in the storm so they call out the search parties to look for him; they call all their relatives; they call the RCMP; they call the coast guard; they call everyone they can think of to help find Harold the boy whom they fear is lost in the storm.

Now of course, it is Harold the bird who left for the island but he is fine. The community is searching high and low for Harold the boy however, who never did leave the safety of his own home. At some point during the day, Harold the boy, who is playing in the attic hears all the noise as the searchers are gathering below and decides to come down and check it out – it sounds like a party. He walks into the midst of everyone and no one notices him. He sees people watching TV with his face on the TV; he sees the RCMP in the living room. He sees people everywhere and he sees neighbours bringing over food and Harold figures this definitely must be a party.

Harold then notices that everyone is looking sad. Nobody is having fun at this party. Some people are crying; nobody looks happy so he pipes up from the middle of this crowd of people who are looking for him and says, “Some party this is!”

It is only then that they look up, take a break from what they are doing that see what is right in front of their eyes. It is only then that they notice Harold is actually standing in their midst – He was never really lost.

In our Bible text today, this is exactly what Simeon did in the busyness of the Temple – stopped, looked up and saw Jesus. Later in Luke Chapter 2, this is exactly what Anna will do in the business of the Temple – stop, look up and see Jesus. And today, this is exactly what we are called to do in the busyness of our own lives – stop, look up and see Jesus.

What are some of the ways today that we may be sadly distracted – even in the churches - from finding Jesus is our midst?





[1] Based on the sermon by Captain Michael Ramsay, Luke 2:21-39: Harold, Harold, and Jesus Presented to Swift Current Salvation Army, December 27, 2009 and October 26, 2014. On-line:  http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2014/10/luke-221-39-harold-harold-and-jesus.html

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Week 32: 3 John 11: Be Good

A devotional thought presented originally to Swift Current Men’s Prayer Breakfast, Thursday 07 May 2015

Read 3 John 9-11

 “A rose by another name is still a rose.” William Shakespeare put these words in the mouth of Juliet in ‘Romeo and Juliet’: “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” Juliet is talking about her love. Juliet says that you cannot change the beautiful nature of something by simply renaming it. A rose is still as beautiful even if you call it a turnip or a skunk.

These days there are myriad ways that some, even in our churches, are trying to convince us that a rose is something other than a rose. Over the past few years we have heard people telling us that the Bible is not the inerrant Word of God (TSA Doc 1). From this deception they proceed to tell us all kinds of things that should be easily seen as untrue. They are selfish and tell us that we have to look out for ourselves before serving God through others. They tell us that even though the Bible says certain selfish behaviours can be changed, the Bible doesn’t really mean what it says: they say that you can’t change your nature so don’t even bother trying. They tell us that we are born certain ways and we’ll never be able to change. This is sad. We know it’s not true.

We have all seen people change. We have all heard testimonies of people whose lives God has changed from the inside out. Many of us have had our own lives changed as we turned them over to God but the Diotrephes of today say that a rose is not a rose and so not only can we not change to be free of behaviours which enslave us but also we must embrace and even build our identity around them: ‘why call a sin, a sin?’ They ask. ‘You can’t be free of sin’, they say. ‘Enjoy your selfish actions’, they say. ‘Look out for number one’, they say. ‘Don’t worry about what God and the Bible say about loving God, your neighbour, and being perfect’, they say, ‘we all sin all the time’, they say, ‘just look after yourself’, they say, ‘and everything else will be okay’, they say.

This selfishness is sad because by putting oneself before God and others, many people are denying the power of Christ to change us. It is sad because they are ignoring what is plain to see: if we seek the Lord, we will find Him. And as we find Him, we will be transformed into His likeness no longer doing evil but instead doing good. We can all be changed; we can all be sanctified; we can all be holy. This is the gospel truth. John’s epistles record that we can be free from sin; we should not be deceived: it is as obvious as the fact that ‘sometimes a cigar really is just a cigar;’ ‘if it swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck;’ ‘a rose by another name is still a rose;’ and, 3 John 11, ‘…anyone who does what is good is from God. Anyone who does what is evil has not seen God.’ And we can all see God and we can all have our lives transformed so that He can do what is good even through us. Therefore, ‘Dear friend[s], do not imitate what is evil but what is good.’

How has God’s goodness been seen in our lives this week?


  

[1] Based on the sermon by Captain Michael Ramsay, 3 John 11: Be from God; Do Good Presented to Swift Current Salvation Army, 10 Feb 2013 and 15 May 2011. On-line:  http://sheepspeaks.blogspot.ca/2013/02/3-john-11-be-from-god-do-good.html

Sunday, May 3, 2015

John 13:21-14:31: Where are you going?

Presented to Swift Current Corps of The Salvation Army on 03 May 2015 and Warehouse Mission 614 Toronto on 10 June 2018 by Captain Michael Ramsay,

This is the 2015 version, to view the 2018 version, click here: https://sheepspeaks.blogspot.com/2018/06/john-1321-1431-where-are-you-going.html

I don’t know how many of you have been following the Boundless Bible Challenge[1] readings. We put the on-line readings in the bulletin every week for those who do not have ready access to a computer. One of two people who write these devotions is Major Beverly Ivany. Do you know who she is? One, she is a writer for the international Salvation Army and two, in her spare time, she is a corps officer. Do you know which corps she and her husband, Major David Ivany (who is Spiritual Director for all of Canada and Pastoral Services Officer for Quebec and all Francophone Officers) run in their spare time? 614 Regent Park, Toronto: the corps to which we are being transferred. This is quite an honour. Majors David and Beverly Ivany are big names and rightfully so as God is using them to do so much in The Salvation Army world. I thought this was a neat connection for us as I was reading the Boundless Bible Challenge in preparation for today.

I wonder too if it is by accident or design, the readings that we have had before us this week: Last weekend was move announcement day. All the Officers who, like ourselves, are moving were told we are going to farewell - and the assigned Boundless readings for this week are part of what is know as 'the farewell discourse'. Either by accident or design or both at the same time, as we have been given our farewell orders the Scriptures we are reading today are taken from the farewell discourse. We’re going to look at the first part today – it is a long discourse – and we have already read the context for the speech as well. This is really quite something in itself.

At the last supper, when Judas left the room the eternal moves were announced, so to speak. Jesus let his disciples know that the time is coming and is actually now here when Jesus will move from them. He informs them of this and gives some instructions and a number of his disciples take this opportunity during the last supper here to ask Jesus a bit about the move. They enquire about where he is going.

Picture this with me. Jesus and his disciples are having dinner upstairs in a rented room in Jerusalem. Jesus has conversations with John and Judas and then Jesus knows, allows, enables, prompts or even provokes Judas to move to do what he is going to do. This will be Jesus’ last evening with his closest disciples: the twelve, now the eleven. After Judas leaves, Jesus turns to his friends and he breaks the news, among other important things that, 13:33-35: “My children, I will be with you only a little longer. You will look for me, and just as I told the Jews, so I tell you now: Where I am going, you cannot come. A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

Jesus is moving away and he tells his friends what he wants from them is that they love each other. I think this is important. I know that as Susan, the girls and I are moving this is the same thing we want: that you love each other. I know that when I see pictures on Facebook, receive news, or a visit from Swift Current, that will be one of the first things I will wonder: how is everyone getting along? Are we still a good little group fighting together for the gospel of Christ? Susan asked us last week in her sermon, ‘do we love one another… even those who can’t make it here on Sundays’? Who has visited Dorothy or Elaine this past week? When is the last time someone contacted the Harders? What about that person who used to always sit near you? What about any of our church family whom we haven’t seen in a while? Have we called them, not to lecture them saying, “haven’t seen you in church for a while?!” but rather to say that we have been praying for you and would like to offer you a word of encouragement. “By this everyone will know you are my disciples”, Jesus says, “if you love one another.” I love you guys and I will miss all of you. There is even more to this command of Jesus’ to love one another. As part of this same farewell discourse Jesus says that greater love has no one than to lay down his life for his friends (15:13). That is what Jesus did for us. That is what the apostles did for him. That is what me must do for each other. Call or visit someone from our flock here this week and spend some time with them – especially someone you haven’t seen in a while. Jesus says, “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

This is good but Simon Peter cues not on the instruction to love his comrades, colleagues, or congregation so much as the fact that Jesus is leaving. ‘Where are you going?’ he asks, in essence, ‘what do you mean we can’t come with you? Why not? I’d die for you!’ Now Jesus’ response is really quite interesting; he tells Peter in essence, ‘Really? You’d die for me? Honestly, even before tonight is finished you will deny me not once, not twice, but three times.’

This is not the sort of response usually recommended to offer a grieving person coming to terms with an impeding move. It is certainly not the response that we instructed people to give in the ESC courses I taught this weekend in Beaver Creek Camp near Saskatoon. Now about this denial, Jesus is right, of course, and Peter does deny him and we know that Peter is later repentant of his actions. And Jesus, after he rises from the dead, forgives, reaffirms, and/or reinstates Peter and we know that according to tradition Peter is good to his word and God does award him with his martyr’s crown.

And there is ore because at this moment the exchange isn’t as lacking in pastoral care as it first appears. As you read on, contained in the very next verses, 14:1-4, Jesus says, “Do not let your hearts be troubled. You believe in God; believe also in me. My Father’s house has many mansions; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am.”[2] Then he says, “You know the way to the place where I am going.”

Now sitting around the table after the last supper, while Peter is still trying to figure out Jesus’ somewhat confusing answer to his simple question, ‘where are you going?’ Thomas tries to help Peter out a bit here. He re-asks, re-phrases, re-articulates, adds to Peter’s ‘where are you going?’  with his own words, Verse 5, “Lord, we don’t know where you are going, so how can we know the way?”[3]

Jesus answers, Verse 6,  “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.”

So Thomas, after trying to help out by re-phrasing Peter’s simple ‘where are you going’ question; now like Peter, is left to ponder Jesus’ somewhat less than simple responses. The response to, ‘how do we get where you are going?’ is ‘I am the way where I am going.’ This probably isn’t all that illuminating for Peter or for Thomas.

Jesus does give them some very important information though. He says point blank that the ONLY way to get to God is through Jesus Christ. There is no other way. There is no other truth. Jesus is the only way to life and the only way to the Father. This is important and while Thomas and Peter may not understand this at the moment, they do later and we should now, right? Basically in layman’s terms: if your mother, brother, son or daughter, do not enter into a relationship through Jesus Christ, they are not going to inherit eternal life with the Father. This is significant. Jesus is telling Thomas, Peter, and the others that there is no other way to be a part of the Kingdom of God than to come through Jesus Christ. So, for us here today, if there is someone you claim to love and you don’t tell him about Jesus, do you really love him? If there is someone you claim to like and you don’t tell her about Jesus, do you really like her? As the only way not to perish is to go through Jesus Christ, if there is someone you do not loathe, it follows that you will tell them about Jesus; if you do not at least try to introduce someone you know to Jesus, is it not true that you really must despise them? Why else would you keep them from salvation? This is what Jesus is saying – Salvation is easy. There is only one way but it is easily accessible. Jesus provided salvation for everyone and if you really do love Jesus and if you really do love your friends, family, and acquaintances then you will point them to the way.[4]

Peter’s simple question ‘where are you going?’ still seems unsatisfied for him though even as Thomas has re-stated it as ‘which way do we go?’ So now Philip takes a crack at getting an answer as he asks for further clarification, Verse 8, “Lord show us the Father and that will be enough.” Jesus’ answers here are hardly any more straightforward and concise but Jesus does give them more important information: Jesus offers them a free introductory course - Trinity 101[5] - so to speak. Jesus says that he is in the Father and the Father is in him. Jesus speaks about the coming of the Advocate, the Paraclete, the Helper, as well as the post-resurrection role of the Holy Spirit and the importance of obeying Christ.[6] He says that they will know that Jesus is in the Father and that we will be in Him so long as we simply obey His commandments and then He will reveal himself to us as he is in us.

So we are starting to make some ground in the conversation here. Remember that this is after dinner and Judas Iscariot has already left. And this has led to a long conversation as the disciples are repeatedly asking Jesus, ‘where are you going?” So now we have Judas (not Judas Iscariot, the other Judas), as they are starting to understand the answer to ‘where are you going’? He ultimately asks, 14:22, “But, Lord, why do you intend to show yourself to us and not to the world?” Jesus then more fully explains to his disciples that He is going away but He will come back (15:28) and when He comes back those who love Him and keep His commands will be eligible to receive that mansion that He has prepared for us (14:2).

So the answer to the question, ‘where is Jesus going?’ After dinner, Jesus and his disciples will leave and then this very night in our text, Jesus will be arrested. He will be tried. He will be executed. Three days later He will rise from the dead and come to his disciples, then later he will ascend to the Father.

That is where Jesus is going now in our text and then sometime very soon now in our world he is coming back and before that happens we will all need to answer a most important question and that question is, where are WE going? Jesus is going to the Father and the ONLY way to the Father is through the Son. Everyone who loves Jesus (as shown by obeying His commands) will go to be with Jesus in our eternal mansion. So the question for us today is not where is Jesus going – we know that - but rather the question for us today is where are WE going? 

Let us pray.



---


[1] The Salvation Army, Boundless: the International Bible Reading Challenge (2015). Available on-line: http://www.salvationarmy.org/biblechallenge
[2] Gail R. O’Day, The Gospel of John, The New Interpreter's Bible, Vol. 9, ed Leander E. Keck, et. al. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1995),740 also  N.T. Wright, John for Everyone Part 2 (Louisville, Kentucky, USA: WJK, 2004),58.and Colin G. Kruse,  John: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL : InterVarsity Press, 2003 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 4), S. 292
[3] Cf. Lincoln, 390.
[4] Cf. Gerard Sloyan, John, Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, ed. James L. Mays, et. al. (Atlanta, Georgia: John Knox Press, 1988),179.
[5] Cf. Gerard Sloyan, John, Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, ed. James L. Mays, et. al. (Atlanta, Georgia: John Knox Press, 1988), 185ff.
[6] Merrill C. Tenney, The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:John/Exposition of John/III. The Private Ministry of the Word (13:1-17:26)/B. The Last Discourse (13:31-16:33)/1. Questions and answers (13:31-14:31)/e. The promise of the Spirit (14:16-21), Book Version: 4.0.2